Share
Liberals in America always seem to have a guilty conscience.
The reason for this is anyone's guess. Obviously they're aware they've done more to advance this country in recent years than anyone has - they remind us every day. Democrats continue to help save the environment, promote welfare programs and support minority rights (excluding the time when they supported and defended black slavery in the south). With all of these extraordinary achievements, why do they always seem to be overcompensating for something?
By now, everyone knows (and was probably taught before they walked into kindergarten), that the doctrine of "separation of church and state" is now invoked at the mere mention of any type of religious activity in schools. Liberals are experts at spotting such insolence, provided the perpetrator isn't practicing Islam.
In my own elementary school, our 6th grade teacher was embarrassed in front of the entire class when the principal announced that her sweater, which had a Christmas tree stitched on the front, would have to be replaced with a neutral holiday image. In N. J., the ACLU filed suit against a teacher who wanted to take her students to see the Broadway musical "A Christmas Carol." She was forced to cancel the highly anticipated event.
In Dallas, Texas, a school administrator received harsh criticism from her colleagues for forwarding an e-mail on her school account that included President Bush's National Day of Prayer Proclamation.
Many people agree with this kind of strict enforcement of separation of church and state. They condemn any type of religious expression, be it symbols, displays, activities or references. My issue right now is not with them; it is with the hypocrisy of these badly applied and biased policies.
The same liberals who applaud teachers for sending children to the principal's office for praying a Christian prayer before lunchtime (happened in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.) are fine with setting up prayer rooms for Muslims and installing taxpayer-funded foot baths in public restrooms.
For the same reason schools shouldn't pay for and distribute rosary beads or crucifixes, they shouldn't be creating a segregated prayer room for Muslims complete with prayer rugs. At George Mason University, even non-Muslim students are asked to separate based on their sex (a Muslim rule) while they are in the prayer room. If that isn't coerced religious activity in a public school, I don't know what is.
'USA Today' reported that an elementary school in San Diego provides students an extra recess period so that Muslim students can pray. Should we then also allow students to receive Catholic communion in the school lunchroom? The hypocrisy in the public school system is appalling. Administrators and teachers should either be accommodating to all religions being practiced and expressed in schools, or they should be consistent with enforcing the policy of "separation of church and state."
Leave a comment 12 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
It seems that the author picked the wrong religion to call privileged in this country. I am not even sure if the author lives in today's world. Try to pretend to be a Muslim for one day and see how privileged you are? Do you call allowing Muslims students to practice their religion in public schools a privilege? I have not heard that before. I thought it was supposed to be their constitutional right. First of all, there is a minute number of public schools have a "specified" area/room that Muslims can use for their daily prayers. You know how long a Muslim needs to use that area for? 5-10mn twice during daylight. No furniture is needed but simple carpet. Any kind of room will do. It could be a gym, a classroom, a meeting room, a basement or any existing facility and it does not have to be dedicated to Muslims the whole time or to Muslims only. The foot-washing sinks case is a health safety issue. Some Muslims choose to wash their feet along with their arms and face 5 times a day before they pray. Existing public sinks are not made for that. The same way we accommodate people with disability in our public restrooms, we need to protect our American citizens from falling while trying to wash their feet in these sinks. I guess you will tell all Muslim students not to wash their feet and therefore not pray as a solution. I hope that's not how the author thinks. Finally, while I don't promote any kind of hate speech towards any race or religion, I do ask the author to also see the proportion of hate crimes committed against American Muslims that the state, people, and the media put the blind eye on with respect to the incident the author mentioned about the Lebanese boy and Jewish girl. YES... "No religion should be awarded privileges and immunity in public schools". But Islam is not that privileged religion.
Reply to this Top
Amine, by the standards liberals and the ACLU apply to Christians practicing their religion in public schools, yes, Muslims are privileged. Christians are punished for having Bible studies or prayers during their lunch hour. References to Christian beliefs in assignments are sanctioned. School children who draw pictures with crosses or other Christian symbols see their artwork tossed out instead of displayed with the work of their classmates. And spare me the public health argument. It's public money spent on support of a specific religion, which is condemned if done for Christians. Personally, I see the entire premise of separation of church and state as flawed. The First Amendment clearly outlines freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion. There are countless references to religion in the foundation of this country. Publicly funded schools should be working to accommodate the religious beliefs of all students, not stifling them. So you're right, it IS your right to practice your religion, even in school, but it is a right we have allowed the government to infringe. Good for Muslims that the liberals are allowing you to practice. Too bad they can't see the hypocrisy in accommodating Muslim practices while banning Christian ones.
Reply to this Top
And by the way Allison, it's not overcompensation liberals are engaged in, it's self-flagellation. The "privileged class" in America is obviously responsible for all the world's ills, and we must right these wrongs for the poor, oppressed souls who can't stand up for themselves. Ban NCAA teams from using Indian mascots, regardless of whether anyone is offended. Those poor, helpless First Americans are too oppressed to understand that they're being made fun of. -- Do liberals REALLY think American Indians are that stupid and helpless? Now THAT'S a racist stereotype, if you ask me. But I forget, liberals cannot be racist by definition.
Reply to this Top
Mike, your example about the indians is so telling. I'm not sure if you've read Dinesh D'Souza's book "Letters to a Young Conservative," but he discusses just that. Dartmouth's mascott had been an Indian until it was deemed offensive. Dinesh sent letters to a hundred Indian tribes asking if it was offensive. They all said no, and when they school didn't listen, Dinesh's group hired a plane to fly over the football stadium with the slogan, "Go Dartmouth Indians!" Some administrators can be so stubborn, even when faced with the facts.
Reply to this Top
Alli Aldrich, you are so ridiculous.
Reply to this Top
Great column Allison. Keep up the great work! There is definitely a bias against Christians. Can we say, double standard.
Reply to this Top
Alli, I'm not sure if you've read Martin Gilbert's The Second World War: A Complete History. In it, you'll find that he discusses just this sort of issue. Apparently, Poland had outlawed National Socialism, deeming it oppressive. Well, Hitler sent envoy's to Poland asking them if they wanted to submit to Nazi rule, and when they didn't listen to his reasoning (which was no doubt articulate and open-minded, as yours is), his group sent legions of bombers and tanks to lay waste to the Polish countryside. Some countries can be so stubborn, even when faced with certain destruction.
Reply to this Top
Great column! Well written, way to finally discuss and bring to light the bias Christian's face everyday.
Reply to this Top
My dad teaches at a public school system and the school calendars have Yom Kippur, Hanukkah, Ramadan, Kwanza, etc all prominently marked on the official school system calendars. December 25th, however, is marked by "Winter Break." Christmas isn't mentioned. Neither is Easter, which always falls during "Spring Break," which is curious because the so-called Spring Break always seems, I'm sure completely independently and absolutely by pure coincidence, to shift with Easter. The only time I go near a church is if I happen to drive near one, but going so far out of the way to pretend Christianity doesn't exist or didn't play a part in the nation's founding is a little absurd. Strike that. A lot absurd.
Reply to this Top
Yet you failed to mention all the ways Muslims are oppressed everyday in America. Tisk, tisk, tisk, just another one sided article from an evangelical conservationist.
Reply to this Top
Just how are Muslims oppressed? Inconvenienced, sure. Discriminated against, sure. Oppression has a very distinct definition, and it certainly does not apply to Muslims in America. We all face mistreatment and unfairness at times. It's not fair that male school teachers are required to leave their doors open at all times (they might be child molesters) while women teachers have no such restriction. It's not fair that women are subjected to unrealistic standards of beauty. It's not fair that the color of your skin influences how people react to you. But you know what? That's life. We all face it. How you respond makes all the difference.
Reply to this Top
I do not see where half of the authors are coming from. They act as if only the Muslim Americans are oppressed, not only in their daily life but with their religion. Amine states that she only needs a room for prayer nothing else, well with my faith I don't even need that, but I can promise that the moment that I kneel before my desk, I would be asked to get up and if I refused would be sent to the principles office. Also, I would like to know since when a church has not been allowed to put up a nativity scene in front of a park because it infringed on someones religion, yes it happened in Florida. All of this freedom of religion yet, many are not allowed to practice or even celebrate their religion.
Reply to this Top