Column: Romney represents conservative values McCain is lacking

Thursday, January, 17, 2008; 12:00 AM | 6 | | Print

Share


After basically declaring that his campaign would be dead with a defeat in the Michigan Republican presidential primary, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney scored a decisive victory in the state on Tuesday.

Once the votes were tallied, the former governor led Arizona Senator John McCain 39 percent to 30 percent. McCain was hoping to garner support from Independents and Democrats who are allowed to switch over and vote in any primary in Michigan.

Undoubtedly, McCain's strategy has to be discouraging to conservative Republicans. If a candidate is openly trying to attract support from the opposition, then he might not be the best option in the general election.

In the past, conservatives have had many qualms with McCain. His campaign finance reform legislation seemed to directly violate the First Amendment of the Constitution.

In limiting the rights of people to donate money in support of candidates and restricting when political advertisements could be run, his legislation contradicts the idea of free speech.

Moreover, before the presidential election season heated up, McCain was in favor of what amounted to an amnesty bill for illegal immigrants - something that once again angered the conservative base of the party. His views were basically in line with those of Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton.

Back then, he took no initiative in securing the border or cracking down on illegal aliens in the country now. Since that time however, he has changed course because he realizes that his previous position was not attractive.

Furthermore, when President Bush first proposed his across-the-board tax cuts, the senator opposed them. In hindsight, he was wrong on the issue because now the federal government is taking in more revenues than ever before.

Undeniably, this shows that the tax cuts were the right option for trying to balance the budget.

Whenever people are given more of their own money back, the economy is stimulated. In turn, this allows people to spend more and economic activity is increased. And every time money is spent, taxes are collected.

This basic conservative principle is at the core of a common sense philosophy that contradicts the idea that raising taxes will increase revenue. Instead, higher taxes dampen economic activity. Apparently on this issue, McCain sided with the liberal philosophy.

Although Romney has previously shown liberal tendencies, his situation is a bit different from that of McCain. In being the governor of possibly the most liberal state in the union, a politician simply has to compromise to accomplish things.

On the other hand, a senator from the much more conservative state of Arizona could afford to stand on principles.

However, McCain has consistently shown that he is decidedly moderate to put it lightly. Certainly, he does not stand for basic conservative principles.

Without a doubt, the liberal mainstream media would love to see the most left-leaning of the Republicans win the nomination.

When McCain won the New Hampshire primary, the media hailed him as the "comeback kid." At the same time, it was said that if Romney didn't win Michigan he would be finished.

Now that Romney has won a major primary, the media did not explode with excitement as they did for McCain. Instead, they simply dismissed his victory stating that Romney made his way back into the fray.

In the current presidential race, Mitt Romney has emerged as the leading conservative candidate in the Republican party.

McCain has stuck to his "independent" philosophy, which alienates conservatives. His record as well as his love affair with the liberal media clearly shows that he is not the right candidate for conservatives or for the Republican Party.

Hopefully, once more conservative states begin voting in the primary, the buzz about John McCain will come to an end once and for all.

Leave a comment 6 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Jonathan Daugherty | # January 17, 2008 @ 9:10 AM — Flag Comment

Where's the beef? That's what I want to know. I keep hearing that Romney is a big conservative, but with his liberal leanings in the past I wonder about him. I have yet to hear a clear tax plan from him like Huck's support of the FairTax or Guiliani's big tax cut plan or Thompson's feelings on a flat tax and lower corporate tax. I haven't seen him stand boldly in opposition to abortions as Huckabee and Thompson have, he merely states in a very John Kerry-esque way that he is "personally opposed" to it. His record shows that he is willing to allow the courts and the legislature to force taxpayers to pay for them. I have heard him support an amendment to keep marriage between one man and one woman, but his record in Massachusetts seems to contradict that stance as well. So what I'm left with is the impression that this guy's got a really good haircut, a beautiful family, and some success at business. Those things don't make him a conservative, they just make him a good guy. So really, where's the beef?

Reply to this Top


Huh? | # January 17, 2008 @ 10:40 AM — Flag Comment

Oh, I see. Romney gets a pass for switching from liberal to moderate, then waffling again, because he's from Massachusetts and it's politically expedient to do that...but he wont do that if President. Riiiiiiiiight. And McCain gets bashed for being a moderate, and offering a solution to illegal immigration while the rest of the party fiddles as Rome burns. Riiiight. What exactly has Romney done about immigration, other than employ illegals? Seems the only conservative values he's demonstrated are those of political expedience. He's just the man for the job!

Reply to this Top


Peebles | # January 17, 2008 @ 10:55 AM — Flag Comment

so cutting taxes? that's the GOP's plan? they should offer a degree in debt expansion.

Reply to this Top


Kyle Minor | # January 17, 2008 @ 3:45 PM — Flag Comment

Well, going back to Regan's policies in his first term, the GOP plan had been to cut taxes AND elimenate funding for social programs then seen to be outside of the scope of the Federal Government. Ron Paul is actually a better example of that sort of fiscal responsibility; too bad his foreign policy is a bunch of nonsense. I don't buy into this whole 'spend spend spend' business, because as the government grows in size it also grows in incompetence.

Reply to this Top


Jason T | # January 17, 2008 @ 5:50 PM — Flag Comment

First, in response to Jonathan, I don't believe there's anything wrong with a Republican candidate who doesn't want to ban abortion or gay marriage. It is a seemingly lost Republican virtue to favor less government involvement in personal matters. You chide Mr. Romney for his stances, but I think they represent a true return to Republican principle. As for taxes, Kyle is right on. Cutting taxes has to go hand-in-hand with reduced government spending. Recent Republicans have advocated cutting taxes but have been unable to cut overall government spending, making their tax cuts a subject of ridicule. It seems that liberals, on the other hand, never even try to curb either taxes or government spending, which I'm not happy with either.

Reply to this Top


well... | # January 17, 2008 @ 7:48 PM — Flag Comment

since the conservatives presided over the creation of this mess, it would be nice to find one of them to clean it up... but i really don't see any of them that are up to the job. romney is a haircut in a suit. no way he wins.

Reply to this Top