Judge rules in favor of CT

Tuesday, April, 1, 2008; 11:11 AM | 13 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: collegiate times

The following sections were declared unconstitutional in this ruling:



A. Beer, wine and mixed beverage advertising in the print or
electronic media is permitted with the following exceptions:

1. All references to mixed beverages are prohibited except the
following: "Mixed Drinks," "Mixed Beverages," "Exotic Drinks,"
"Polynesian Drinks," "Cocktails," "Cocktail Lounges," "Liquor" and
"Spirits";

2. The following terms or depictions thereof are prohibited unless
they are used in combination with other words that connote a
restaurant and they are part of the licensee's trade name: "Bar,"
"Bar Room," "Saloon," "Speakeasy," or references or depictions of
similar import; and

3. Any references to "Happy Hour" or similar terms are prohibited.

B. Further requirements and conditions are as follows:

3. Advertisements of beer, wine and mixed beverages are not allowed
in college student publications unless in reference to a dining
establishment, except as provided below. A "college student
publication" is defined as any college or university publication that
is prepared, edited or published primarily by students at such
institution, is sanctioned as a curricular or extra-curricular
activity by such institution and which is distributed or intended to
be distributed primarily to persons under 21 years of age.

Advertising of beer, wine and mixed beverages by a dining
establishment in college student publications shall not contain any
reference to particular brands or prices and shall be limited only to
the use of the following words: "A.B.C. on-premises," "beer," "wine,"
"mixed beverages," "cocktails," or any combination of these words; and

Though Lauck filed an injunction against enforcing the regulations, neither publication can begin placing alcohol related advertising yet. ABC has 30 days to file an appeal.

Continue Reading:  « Previous12

Leave a comment 13 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Skyy vodka | # April 1, 2008 @ 11:58 AM — Flag Comment

OMG, take that ABC! Now, start printin' those alcohol ads!

Reply to this Top


Matt | # April 1, 2008 @ 1:58 PM — Flag Comment

The CT ought to have more to report on than the latest fashionable drinking trends.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 1, 2008 @ 2:14 PM — Flag Comment

It's not reporting, moron. Read the article. It's for advertising which makes the CT a lot of money!

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 1, 2008 @ 3:43 PM — Flag Comment

I'm gettin drunk to celebrate

Reply to this Top


Kyle Minor | # April 1, 2008 @ 3:55 PM — Flag Comment

Raises an interesting question, though, regarding the legality of tobacco advertisements as well. I recognize that there are federal statutes which prohibit tobacco advertisements - it just strikes me as odd that the government has created for itself an 'intellectual monopoly' on tobacco sales by running its own anti-smoking commercials without any sort of permissible rebuttal from the tobacco industry.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 1, 2008 @ 8:21 PM — Flag Comment

poorly written in the first paragraph someone should define the rules in question never assume your reader knows the back part of the story

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 1, 2008 @ 8:34 PM — Flag Comment

Agree with the last person, no mention of what law they are even talking about until the end of the article. More poor reporting from the CT....

Reply to this Top


ryan | # April 1, 2008 @ 9:05 PM — Flag Comment

yeah seriously...really poorly written

Reply to this Top


Jason T | # April 2, 2008 @ 12:04 PM — Flag Comment

Although this article is ABOUT the newspaper, should it necessarily be IN the newspaper?

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 4, 2008 @ 4:32 AM — Flag Comment

The CT is full or slipshod reporting. They never check their facts and have no sense of journalistic ethics. You will rarely find a piece of real reporting in this rag.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous Coward | # April 5, 2008 @ 10:10 PM — Flag Comment

I get so tired of posters who believe it's trendy to bash the CT without presenting any examples. Sure, they screw up, and sure you should offer criticism, but mindlessly ragging on fellow students is pretty low.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous Coward | # April 5, 2008 @ 10:11 PM — Flag Comment

Jason, I thought the same thing about whether this should be in the CT. But in their defense, I did see it dozens of other places, including washpost: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040101121.html

Reply to this Top


Blacksburg Brewing Company | # April 6, 2008 @ 3:51 PM — Flag Comment

Finally! Looking forward to advertising in the future!

Reply to this Top