Share
"Those who want to advocate for greater concealed carry on campus, they have a heavy burden of showing they were right given what I have heard from law enforcement professionals who do this every day," Kaine said.
Most gun control bills did not make it into Virginia law. Only two main bills got past the legislature into the governor's hands, and both were vetoed.
Neither would have affected college campuses, according to Cole. One would have allowed concealed carry permit holders to keep their gun in the glove box of a car instead of on a seat beside him or her. The other bill would let concealed carry permit holders possess firearms in restaurants that serve alcohol as long as they do not consume alcohol.
"I thought both of those were very reasonable and responsible measures, and I was disappointed to see the governor veto them," Cole said.
Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens' Defense League, suggested that he was disappointed with the governor.
"The governor's all mixed up," Van Cleave said. "I think he's very confused about the whole issue himself."
Van Cleave stated that America has tried having stricter gun control, especially in the last 30 years, but "decided it doesn't work and only restricts the law-abiding citizens," instead of criminals.
When Van Cleave and his counterparts were lobbying legislators against gun control policies before April 16, he said, "it felt like we were in a race against time and time ran out for 32 students."
Two days after the shootings, Kaine announced that former state police superintendent Gerald Massengill would lead a review of authorities' handling of April 16 events. Massengill said that after speaking with campus police, college officials and students, the panel decided that, "more guns on campus, just the idea of guns, doesn't appear to be a prudent thing."
He said he was disappointed that the "gun show loophole bill" didn't pass, and explained that allowing concealed carry on campus may cause problems.
"Police expressed concern that if we are called into a situation, it would be in the best interest of public safety to not have to figure out if the guy with the gun was a bad guy or good guy," Massengill said.
However, he added that the panel's report stated, "it certainly could be reasonably argued that if someone had been on the second floor with a gun, Cho probably wouldn't have killed 30 people." He said bills such as these should be highly considered before passing or failing.
"The issue is a difficult one," Massengill said.
Continue Reading: « Previous12
Leave a comment 5 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
Candace, great job finding background for this article. There were so many gun related bills during this session, and you did very well reporting all of them fairly. Kudos!
Reply to this Top
This is an excellent summary of firearm-related legislation. Great job, Candace!
Reply to this Top
CHP holders can already keep their loaded weapons anywhere in the vehicle. The bill that Gov. Kaine vetoed would have allowed non-CHP holders to keep a loaded firearm in their glove box. Secondly, anyone---CHP holder or not---can possess a firearm in an ABC licensed establishment, so long as the weapon is OPENLY displayed. The second bill vetoed by Gov. Kaine would have allowed CHP holders to carry a CONCEALED firearm in an ABC licensed establishment, which is currently prohibited.
Reply to this Top
And to add to what Jonathan said, the "concealed carry in restaurants" bill was put up so that people dining out didn't have to walk in (carrying openly) and distract others eating who are uncomfortable with guns. This is the same as the word "Concealed" being in the name of SCCC - so that the sight of a gun doesn't distract others on campus, either. It's a respect thing. But the Gov. said he didn't want to mix guns and drinking, and vetoed the bill. Hey Gov., thats why the other part of the bill said one "may not drink when carrying." Gun-rights groups are well aware of the issues, but not enough people pay attention to the efforts made to address them.
Reply to this Top
Good article, Candace.
Reply to this Top