Share
Alcohol violations among student organizations have increased to 27 incidents to date this year, a number which university officials from the office of judicial affairs believes is high risk compared to previous years.
Francis Keene, director of judicial affairs, said that violations among organizations commonly occur when people do not realize how much alcohol they are consuming.
"The most concerning thing is that I don't feel student organizations as a whole understand the personal risk that goes on, especially with alcohol, not even just formal events, but even things that go on in apartments," Keene said. "There could be criminal actions, ramifications from a legal perspective."
Ed Spencer, associate vice president for student affairs said that organization leaders need to be concerned about these issues.
"If you are an officer here and your name is on the line, you need to realize the position you are in with university policies," he said. "27 is heavy, it is heavy. Even taking into account cases that were adjudicated (because of April 16)."
The Office of Judicial Affairs is notified in a few different ways when an organization violates university rules.
"There are some who walk into the office (and report an incident), we sometimes receive anonymous complaints, but most of the time it's a police-generated or RA-generated report," Keene said. "The organization affiliation is determined by what someone says, what someone is wearing, or what others who observed the behavior is affiliated on.
We have had students just walk in and hand us a complaint and sometimes citizens will send us complaints when events are held outside on other property, even away from our campus."
Recently Facebook has gotten some organizations in hot water.
"We don't spend our time routinely searching for things on Facebook," Keene said. "What happens is someone says, 'hey, you need to take a look at this page' and that's not different to us when someone says you need to see these photos that were taken, or a notice on an engineering billboard with a notice for a party - we have to be reactive to something that comes in. People forget that the Internet is a public forum. If you put things up publicly, I'm not going to ignore them if someone brings them to my attention. I think that students think we look for that, but we don't have that time to do that."
Spencer agreed and noted that students should be aware of how ubiquitous Facebook is, even if their profile is limited.
"When people restrict pages to friends, don't forget that friends don't always stay friends and friends don't always keep things to themselves," he said.
Facebook was used as a tool when the former Virginia Tech Snowboard Club was under investigation for an organizational violation. As a result, the club recently had its charter revoked and is under deferred suspension for two semesters.
Nina Eerry, junior industrial design major and former design chair and president elect of the club said that a police officer found the event on Facebook and used it to question people living on campus and investigate further about the event.
"Nowhere on the poster was there any indication that we advertised alcohol, the only thing we said was that there would be DD's," Eerry said.
Eerry did not think that the annual snowboard club party would cause any controversy in the first place because of the way things had been over the years. Many students are aware of the party, which has been popular over the years. This year, the party was held on February 22.
"We went about the party the same way we usually do," Eerry said. "We advertised the party, we weren't selling alcohol, we were selling wristbands and entertainment. We had a couple of bands and people had to pay to compete in Rail Jam (the snowboarding competition)."
Officers for the club did not foresee any problems, even when they were asked by the town to leave the house they rented for their annual event. Eerry said that they seemed to have no hard feelings.
One of the problems that might have contributed to the rising number is that some were not getting the message or did not know what the rules were, or that the rules were being ignored, Keene said.
Leave a comment 5 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
Looking at the chart on the front page I belive there was a mistake. The honor system doesn't handle any violations other than those that are academic in nature, the figures provided must have been for Judicial Affairs violations, not Honor Code violations.
Reply to this Top
VT needs to relax and let the students enjoy themselves. Granted we make mistakes, but often, Tech treats its students like they're little babies who have no concept of maturity. This is highly problematic in Oak Lane. The incoming freshman class has almost a 4.0 grade point average and should be treated with dignity. At least give students enough room to get in trouble.
Reply to this Top
I would have to disagree with the previous post. Most of the cases that wind up in judicial affairs are there because students were beligerent while drinking. Often times, students have to be escorted via ambulance or VT Rescue is called due to over drinking. Those instances must be documented by various individuals for liability purposes. Also, it's important to note that if the Police are in any way involved, the situation is automatically referred to Judicial Affairs. It's not difficult to drink responsibly and have no issues with the University. However, those that do get caught must suffer the consequences of their actions. When drinking at all, it's important to note the possibly repercussions of such actions. Not doing so is irresponsible and if that is the case, one probably shouldn't be drinking.
Reply to this Top
T - go home and grow up again. Your comment shows you lack maturity to even drink period.
Reply to this Top
Yes, N I agree with you, I understand taking action when people are belligerent or consumed too much alcohol but Judicial Affairs does not differentiate between those violations and then others. For example, 2 weeks ago I had a 21 year old in my room that had a backpack with some beer in it. Just my luck an RA walked by at the exact right time and herd the bottles clank. NO ONE in the room had a sip of alcohol, the RA knew that, and I ended up with 1-year probation, 1 strike, and a 2 hr alcohol class, I wasn't drinking and it wasn't even my beer. I got the exact same penalties as my friend who was passed out in an elevator and then provided false information to the RA that found him. Just because the 21 year old was in my room automatically means I am in possession, again this is understandable, but the penalties where way over the top. How is this fair? Judicial Affairs is overzealous and needs to be on a more case-by-case basis then give a general penalty in terms of alcohol violations.
Reply to this Top