Column: Beef: It's what's going to destroy the environment

Friday, September, 19, 2008; 12:00 AM | 17 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: environment meat pollution

As the environmental trend energetically continues, more and more people are constantly jumping on the sustainability bandwagon.

For budding environmentalists, the departure down a greener path generally begins with changing light bulbs, finding a recycling bin, dusting off an old bike or even looking into investing in a fuel-efficient or hybrid car.

Not often considered, however, is a simple change in one's basic diet. Meat production actually generates about one-fifth of the world's greenhouse gases, a larger proportion than transportation or fossil fuel retrieval and production.

Meat, once a delicacy, has become -- for the developed world -- the rule rather than the exception. And while this is an encouraging sign about a country's economy, the majority of the affluent world certainly overeats. In 1961, the world's meat supply centered around 71 million tons annually; in 2007, it reached 284 million tons. This number continues to rise, and is expected to double by the year 2050.

So how does this affect the environment? Experts in the Livestock, Environment and Development Initiative have recently declared the raising and production of meat contributes on a "massive scale" to climate change, land destruction, air and water pollution and a drastic decrease in biodiversity. This study concluded that the livestock industry is currently one of the top two or three largest contributors to today's environmental problems, both in America and around the world.

Between growing the food supply of meat-producing animals and producing, preparing and then transporting the meat, the industry takes its toll on numerous resource and environmental areas: these include the clearing of rainforests and vast consumption of energy, and therefore generation of massive amounts of greenhouse gases, the culprits in the recent rise of global temperatures.

In the United States alone, raising grain to feed animals raised for food uses 80 percent of all agricultural land, one-half of all water resources and one-third of all fossil fuels. This depletion of resources goes hand in hand, as always, with environmental pollution. For instance, the agricultural community contributes to nearly 75 percent of all water pollution in the United States.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

Leave a comment 17 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Bernard Brown | # September 19, 2008 @ 7:21 AM — Flag Comment

Great piece, especially in the recommendation to cut back on meat consumption. Mark Bitten who writes the Minimalist column in the NY Times wrote a great piece called "Putting Meat in its Place," on using meat but at smaller quantities and not as the centerpiece of every meal. There are a lot of ways to eat a more plant-based diet and still enjoy eating. Bernard Brown Director, PB&J Campaign http://www.pbjcampaign.org

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 19, 2008 @ 7:35 AM — Flag Comment

The green/environmentalist movement is just an attack on our civil liberties and freedoms.

Reply to this Top


RAIN | # September 19, 2008 @ 9:44 AM — Flag Comment

GO VEGAN... YES YOU GET ALL THE NUTRIENTS YOU NEED FROM A PLANT BASED DIET INCLUDING PROTEIN. YEAH IT IS A LIFE CHANGE BUT IT MAKES SENSE. DON'T BE SELFISH AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIS WORLD AND FOR OUR FUTURE KIDS. THE WORLD IS NOT YOURS IT IS EVERYONES. SO YOUR MEAT EATING AFFECTS ALL OF US. THAT IS A FACT. WATCH "EARLTHINGS." GOOGLE VIDEO AND READ "THE CHINA STUDY" (THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK YOU WILL EVER READ)

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 19, 2008 @ 9:46 AM — Flag Comment

Or perhaps we can eat meat the way we should be eating it anyway - locally raised, eating local plants/grasses. You knock out most of the greenhouse gas consumption by feeding your livestock what they'd be eating naturally in the area, and it also gets to my table fresher and tastes better without all the cross-country shipping going on anyway. The green/environmentalist movement is well-intentioned and necessary (unlike what the last poster claims), and eating meat the way we should be eating meat would be a great start towards being more environmentally friendly and healthier.

Reply to this Top


texas | # September 19, 2008 @ 1:14 PM — Flag Comment

FU HIPPIES

Reply to this Top


HokieA | # September 19, 2008 @ 1:37 PM — Flag Comment

Where did you get the info that meat production causes more greenhouse gas than transportation, my father is an owner of one of the largest meat producing companies in the US and i can assure you thats not true, i know for a fact

Reply to this Top


Astha | # September 19, 2008 @ 2:07 PM — Flag Comment

I agree, this is a great and very informative article. The facts about meat consumption are shocking but true - I only came to learn about them recently when I started working for Meatless Monday, a non-profit public health campaign. If you want to reduce your carbon footprint, going meatless one day a week will be a tremendous help, as this article states. You’ll be lowering your risk of heart disease as well. If you go to www.meatlessmonday.com/recipearchive you can find a ton of great meatless recipe ideas. Also – for the person who commented on sources – check out the U.N. FAO report published in 2006 called Livestocks Long Shadow. You can download the report there and see the facts firsthand. (http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0612sp1.htm)

Reply to this Top


Save the Planet | # September 19, 2008 @ 2:55 PM — Flag Comment

Save a Plant! Eat a Vegan!

Reply to this Top


John | # September 19, 2008 @ 3:46 PM — Flag Comment

Seeing as how there was a recent article stating that scientific studies in Britain showed that vegetarians and vegans had large amounts of brain loss akin to drinking or drug use, while meat-eaters did not show such declines in brain mass, do we really think that's a good way to go? I sure don't. But I do think the best alternative is to eat locally raised produce and livestock to cut down on total impacts as much as possible and to do everything in moderation. Too much or too little of anything can be harmful...we need balance.

Reply to this Top


Susan | # September 19, 2008 @ 4:28 PM — Flag Comment

My family own one of hte largest cow-calf operations in the US, but I can assure you the facts are correct. The irony of this is that the main report Ms. Pinkston cites, Livestock's Long Shadow which found the livestock industry creates more emissions than transportation, was financed by the meat industry as a means for the meat industry to understand it's carbon footprint and improve it. Dr. Henning Steinfeld, who is in the Livestock group at the UN's Food and Agriculture organization (and the lead author of the report) explained this at a panel discussion put on by Compassion in World Farming in the UK last week, along with Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, who heads the UN IPCC. The event was filmed by Supreme Master Television. A friend of mine who conducted the interview spoke with Dr. Pachauri afterwards who said that many scientists had contacted him to tell him the figure is actually much higher than this.

Reply to this Top


Susan | # September 19, 2008 @ 4:35 PM — Flag Comment

Eating vegan is also 7 times more efficient than eating locally grown food. A report by scientists at Carnegie Mellon University found that in the US diet meat (chicken, red meat, fish), eggs and dairy are responsible for 68 percent of the emissions put out by the US diet. They also found that eating a vegan diet ONE DAY per week was more efficient than eating a locally grown diet all year. The name of the report is "Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States."

Reply to this Top


Susan | # September 19, 2008 @ 4:40 PM — Flag Comment

Vegan diets are also more healthy than meat diets. Regarding the study in the UK finding brains were smaller, this has to do with people who have not had enough B12. It is simple to supplement. The American Dietetics Association and the Dietitians of Canada have put out several position papers on Vegetarian diets concluding they meet all nutritional needs through out all stages of the human lifecycle (pregnancy, baby, toddler, adult, etc). They also found that vegetarians and vegans live longer than meat eaters and are healthier -- based upon an analysis of over 250 studies. The lastest positon paper is from 2003, there are also several earlier ones. Finally a UK study reported last year found that children with higher IQ's were much more likely to be vegetarian later in life, and there is a higher than average population of vegetarians belonging to Mensa.

Reply to this Top


Carnivore | # September 20, 2008 @ 2:22 PM — Flag Comment

What you left out is the fact that most vegans are obnoxious, self-righteous people who treat people who believe differently than they do as evil people whose behavior must be changed. Hey - if you wanna eat dandelions and egg plant knock yourself out but leave me alone as I cut into my beautiful rare steak.

Reply to this Top


Jason T | # September 24, 2008 @ 1:23 PM — Flag Comment

To Anonymous: How do you know this? Do you poll everyone that doesn't look like walking death to find out if they eat meat? I know several healthy vegans and several malnourished vegans. The same can be said for omnivores.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 24, 2008 @ 4:16 PM — Flag Comment

Yes Jason, I do.

Reply to this Top


Kris | # December 2, 2008 @ 1:49 PM — Flag Comment

or, go vegetarian. Or better yet, vegan. (finish your thought)

Reply to this Top


uebernachtung guenstig in andernach buchen | # December 1, 2010 @ 11:16 PM — Flag Comment

Appearance Recently,reader set traditional presence revolution style minute income act notion cat absence family kill use wear means drink origin grant serious enough gentleman job tall product immediate transport top dark most speech trouble marriage act text category book therefore threaten ourselves same distance sheet approach yard congress protect tour pay body realize project round guest failure dark already run pain spend hot independent boy examine driver double population sex living approach common towards response agree large whereas table within river release reach will transfer screen up dinner

Reply to this Top