"What's the deal with Asians at your school?"
Someone from home posed that question to me last week following the news of the stabbing death at the Graduate Life Center on our campus. I assume they were making a speculative and unfounded connection between the recent murder committed by Haiyang Zhu and the shootings on April 16, 2007, committed by Seung-Hui Cho.
While both homicides were committed by Asian men enrolled at Virginia Tech, I was shocked that someone would make such an assumption based solely off of that fact. Even more disheartening is that similar comments have been made to members of Virginia Tech administration and among our own student body. Additionally, online blogs including the infamous PerezHilton.com have fostered unbelievably crude discussion over international students at our school.
President Charles Steger addressed these issues of racism and others in an e-mail sent out to the campus community on Tuesday night. Not only was the e-mail informative and necessary, it was thoughtful and showed a great deal of respect for all Tech students.
He stressed the safety measures that are in place and the quick reaction time of the Virginia Tech Police Department, but also the reality that none of these things stopped the violence that occurred in the Graduate Life Center.
Most importantly, he touched on the issue of racist assumptions many people are making because both the April 16 shooting and last week's stabbing were committed by Asian men.
That fact strikes me as nothing but purely coincidental, and to assume that some kind of violent pattern exists among Asians, here or anywhere else, is absurd. As Steger pointed out in his e-mail, Asians are not only under-represented in Virginia Tech's judicial system violations, but they are statistically 10 times less likely to commit murder than whites in the United States.
Leave a comment 15 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
I really enjoy the breakdown of the email in this column. Last two paragraphs tell us what is wrong, not to mention the praise directed at Steger along the way. And while Liza notes that, "People, here and elsewhere, making comments about the safety of our university and the quality of human beings it admits, are simply wrong -- especially when citing race or ethnicity as a cause of violent behavior." I am intrigued because it is not even mentioned how Steger does just that when he said, "Nationally, the Bureau of Justice statistics point out that Asians are ten times less likely to commit homicide than whites in the United States."
Reply to this Top
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/homtrnd.htm Lots of Department of Justice data related to homicides (by age, gender, race, and on and on).
Reply to this Top
You, my dear columnist, are sadly gullible.
Reply to this Top
I think it can not be ignored that foreign students from Asian cultures are more likely to be quiet and not seek out help. Some Asian also place a lot of value on honor. If someone feels like that have shamed their family, they are more likely to act or commit suicide taking someone that has dishonored them with them.
Reply to this Top
Andy from the first two postings is not the one that posted at 12:41 on 2/5.
Reply to this Top
The point is that race may correlate to estrangement and ostracism, but the root cause, if there is one, probably has less to do with race or ethnicity itself, and more to do with the simple fact that international students are likly to have less of a support structure of family and friends here in the US. Race is hardly ever a determining factor in one's actions, yet people seem to constantly point to it as a causal factor, rather than a correlating one.
Reply to this Top
That's mostly, Jason, because the majority of Americans don't really understand what statistics mean, in general. Taken at its root, a statistic is really an assessment of the probability that a given event or set of events would have happened 'by chance.' To wit, when we see that Asians are 'statistically less likely to be charged with crimes,' what we are really seeing is an assessment that, in a pool of Asians selected totally randomly, you wouldn't be surprised to have happened to have chosen a certain number who had committed crimes. Statistics don't forecast future events, nor do they explain past ones - statistics yield a measure of expectation which is only as accurate as the data on which they are built.
Reply to this Top
But like I said, most people don't really understand that - and as a consequence, they tend to infer things from statistics that aren't really true. This is especially true in the social sciences, which is one reason why I believe exactly nothing that comes out of the mouth of any sociologist. You can't infer motivation from any sort of statistical analysis, regardless of your inputs. . .
Reply to this Top
So who is Asian? People from the Asian continent? If so, Israelis are Asians. So are most Russians, Iranians, Filipinos, and Pakistanis. What commonalities do they share? Nothing, except they are all human-beings. The term "Asian" is nonsense in most cases. It is tempting to simplify the world and blame the one or two groups for all the wrongs. We have spent 8 years already doing so. What do we get? Trillions of dollars in debt, two wars in hand, and economy in the drain. Have we learned anything from the last 8 years of stupidity?
Reply to this Top
JD, your comment is retarded...(about 6-7 comments down)
Reply to this Top
Well, let's be fair here Zhou. The term 'Asian' generally serves as an abbreviation of 'Asian/Pacific Islander," which refers to most of the nations South of Russia, East of the Indian subcontinent, and North or Australia. So in a general sense you may be right, colloquially the term 'Asian' refers to a pretty specific ground of countries. Similarly, your assessment of the cause-effect relationship of 'the last 8 years' is an oversimplification of an otherwise heinously complex situation. Nobody blamed, for instance, the Taliban for the fact that terrorists exist - but the Taliban as a governing body, in addition to its general cruelty towards its citizens, failed to take action against known terrorists residing within their borders.
Reply to this Top
It's bizarre that the author of this article refers to the Zhu and Cho incidents as "both homicides," and that Zhu was a suspect in a "stabbing" and Cho carried out "a shooting." Did she forget that Cho MURDERED THIRTY-TWO students in cold blood and wounded 25 more and that Zhu BEHEADED his victim in a campus cafe? Talk about Orwellian.
Reply to this Top
How many Asians are in the VA State House or Senate? On the VT Board of Directors? On the VT policy group? Let me guess - none. These groups barely have a token black. ZL Hikes was replaced by a really old white guy - Ed Spencer - who called his wife at 0800 on 4-16-07 & told her of a "killer at large." These are typically groups of inbred old white men. $teger is the most inbred of the cretins. VT crows about its 'diversity." Diversity starts by firing $teger.
Reply to this Top
Site <a href="http://www.pskiller.com/">Photoshopped Image Killer</a> have developed an algorithm to automatically detect when a digital photo has been manipulated. Their statistical technique is based on the fact that altering an image messes with the hidden mathematics inside the photo.
Reply to this Top
Most image forensics are done through a way called "copy and paste", which means part of the image is copied from another part of it. A site named <a href="http://www.pskiller.com/">Photoshopped Image Killer</a> can detect such kind of image forgery very well. It identifies the forgery by detecting repetitions in the digital bits that comprise the imageeven if those repetitions are too subtle for the eye to detect or damaged by image compressions like JPEG.
Reply to this Top