Contemplating grades versus evaluations

Wednesday, February, 25, 2009; 10:44 PM | 8 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: grades evaluations association of american colleges and universities

The Association of American Colleges and Universities, which represents more than 1,150 accredited colleges and universities, including Virginia Tech, held its annual meeting on Jan. 21 to discuss the use of grades in higher education.

The hypothetical new system discussed, which would replace traditional grades, would require teachers to report on their students' progress through narrative evaluations that would encompass all aspects of the students' work and development throughout the semester.

The transition away from grades would not be a new one, as there are already schools that rely on narrative evaluations as a means of reporting on a students' progress.

New Hampshire College in Massachusetts is a small liberal arts school that has a student body of around 1,400 students. The school has been using narrative evaluations as a method to evaluate students since the university's inception in 1970.

Roberta Stuart, the director of central record at New Hampshire College, said evaluations "replace grades entirely; the faculty feels strongly that evaluations are more informative than grades."

These narratives reports are designed to encompass the entire body of the students' work and "give the outside world an idea of what the work of the student is like," Stuart said.

The faculty of New College of Florida, a liberal arts college with a student body half the size of New Hampshire College, feels very strongly about their student evaluation system's ability to determine an individual's progress.

New College assigns its students traditional assignments such as tests or quizzes, but these do not receive a letter grade. Instead, all the assignments add up to an individual merit of evaluation about the student's progress in the course. Suzanne L. Janney, special assistant to the president, said, "The evaluations give students a lot of insight into their own performance."

"The students know where their areas of strength and weaknesses are," Janney said. Evaluations aren't "something you'd get from traditional grades."

The evaluation system at both New College and New Hampshire College may benefit from the relatively small size of their student bodies. Stuart added that any individual student, by the time they leave the school, could have a transcript that is easily over 20 pages. At New College, the majority of classes have only 10 to 19 students, whereas Virginia Tech regularly has classes composed of 100 or more students.

The lack of traditional grades may be a cause for concern for students who are on scholarships that require a student maintain a specific GPA. However, Stuart insisted, "There are a very few scholarships for which students are not eligible." By working closely with scholarship committees, New Hampshire College is able to ensure that very few students are rejected for the absence of a GPA.

According to Tara Young of the Department of Education, as long as a student meets the satisfactory standard of progress that is set by the school they attend -- whether it involves assigning grades or not -- they are still eligible to receive federal financial aid.

Mike Ellerbrock, professor of agricultural and applied economics at Virginia Tech, questions what grades are in fact capable of telling us about students' progress.

"They are an approximate measure at best," Ellerbrock said.

He also noted that for a system like the one in place at New College to work at Tech, would depend on "how much energy a professor is willing to put into exercises of grading and getting to know his or her students."

Richard Oderwald, the associate dean for the college of natural resources, likes the idea behind being able to individually evaluate a student in that manner, but said that it is "difficult just assigning grades (to that many people)."

"Some of the classes are 600 students. It would be difficult to know students well enough to do that; consistency would be a problem from year to year, or class to class," Oderwald said.

Craig Brians, an associate professor of political science at Tech, went a step further than his colleagues.

"I don't see this (evaluations) realistically working out for any class (at Tech)," he said.

Brians also questioned whether the teachers at Tech with larger class sizes would be up to the task of writing an evaluation for every student.

"If you are teaching 150 to 200 students a year, can you really write a three-page description on each student?" Brians said. "If a student wants to know in my class beyond grades, they can come and chat with me any time."

Leave a comment 8 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Ken S. | # February 25, 2009 @ 11:51 PM — Flag Comment

In many of the education courses and programs offered here, we discuss these concepts regularly. What this article didn't emphasize is the value of moving away from grades. Grades are subjective, have a lot of weaknesses in how they are assigned and used, and put a lot of pressure on students to compete/perform that cloud the real goal - learning. In most graduate programs, grades are hardly a focus of any student, but learning and value in the topics ARE focuses; this is desired in undergraduate programs, too. Initiatives at VT, like ePortfolio, are attempting to address the above, and there are also discussions about modular grading systems, where students must exhibit proficiency in particular skill/knowledge areas before they can move forward. All examples of how education is being re-considered regularly!

Reply to this Top


Elliotte | # February 26, 2009 @ 10:54 AM — Flag Comment

"These narratives reports are designed to encompass the entire body of the students' work and "give the outside world an idea of what the work of the student is like," Stuart said." As an alum in the "outside world" who is working, every year I get an annual review and on my annual review I get graded, with letter grades. While some businesses may not use letter grades, many others do as it offers a system that most are familiar with after being in high school/college.

Reply to this Top


Jason T | # February 26, 2009 @ 11:43 AM — Flag Comment

Whether it is ideologically sound or not, this idea is at odds with the ever-increasing national college enrollment numbers. College is becoming more of a diploma mill than an individualized experience. Grades are subjective, but so are qualitative assessments of students' work. We must remember that these lengthy evaluations don't die upon a student's graduation; they endure, as graduate schools, potential employers, etc. filter through page after page of a much less concise method of assessment for every candidate. Grades, plus letters of recommendation, plus a personal portfolio should give enough information to anyone who needs to know you that well.

Reply to this Top


George Bluth | # February 26, 2009 @ 11:47 AM — Flag Comment

Sounds like another one of those gradeless, structureless, new age feel-gooderies.

Reply to this Top


Eric Wood | # February 26, 2009 @ 1:41 PM — Flag Comment

It is already a pain when students try to argue their letter grade with professors, and the grade system is based on concrete numbers. I can't imagine the nightmare of countless students arguing with their professor to get a better narrative assessment.

Reply to this Top


Jochebed | # February 26, 2009 @ 5:33 PM — Flag Comment

George is right - bad grades hurt peoples' self esteem so we better get rid of them. No more D's of F's just kindly worded nothings that mean nothing. What a sissy thing to even contemplate. Let's be sure not to hurt anyone's feelings ever. Boohoo.

Reply to this Top


Jason Wojciechowski | # March 1, 2009 @ 2:15 PM — Flag Comment

First, it's called Hampshire College, not New Hampshire College. A simple google-base fact-check would have found this. Second, I can say from experience that, at least at Hampshire, arguments over evaluations do not happen in significant numbers. It's simply not part of the culture of the school.

Reply to this Top


Jason T | # March 2, 2009 @ 4:11 PM — Flag Comment

Here's what it comes down to: if you want small faculty:student ratios and in-depth, multi-faceted evaluations, go to a small school. I don't think anyone coming into VT is shocked to be herded into freshman lectures with hundreds of others. The positive side to large research universities is that they tend to have the resources necessary to accommodate a significant variety of undergraduate research opportunities. This is what leads you to cultivate marketable skills and interact directly with professors who will ultimately assess you by writing recommendations on your behalf. To me, this is even more valuable than more detailed grade reporting.

Reply to this Top