UVa commencement planning sparks conflict

Thursday, April, 30, 2009; 10:23 PM | 9 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: commencement speaker uva

Vu believed that a more open forum is appropriate for an event in which the students are invested. She suggested the creation of an online area to post speaker ideas, or that the students on the committee would be more publicized so that the student body could give them input. She noted that in regards to such suggestions, Gilliam "didn't take them very well."  

Eventually, the university responded and changed the process for next year. All students were able to apply this spring for the five additional positions on the 2010 commencement committee, although the Student Council president still picks from the applicants.

At Virginia Tech, the decision for the commencement speaker comes directly from the president's office.

Christina Todd, the Tech Class of 2009 Woman At Large, is the sole student representative on the commencement committee.

She attended the monthly committee meetings with representatives from all colleges and the graduate school, but in terms of the speaker for graduation, she said the planning was "all kind of headed out of the president's office," and that the decision to bring Gen.Lance Smith - Tech alumnus of the Pamplin College of Business - was not a responsibility of the committee.

The Class of 2009 student representatives will choose the student speakers among themselves. Two representatives speak at the fall commencement and two speak at the spring commencement. Todd spoke in the fall.

The process that the president's office chooses the speaker each year is "not as formal as you might think," said Mark Owczarski, university spokesman. "There's a lot of different ideas and candidates."

Todd said she wasn't aware of any sort of process similar to UVa's.

The commencement committee planned the logistics of commencement in terms of security and venues. Todd said that there weren't many issues that the committee had to vote on, but primarily figured out where each college would have its graduation.

Todd explained that the committee wanted to create more transparency about commencement and that every final decision was posted on the Web site as it developed.

Todd said she did not feel like the students were underrepresented on a panel that contained only one student member.

"If they have questions about student representation, I never felt like I couldn't say anything," Todd said.

However, she agreed that an increased student representation would be useful.

"Obviously the more input we could have the better," Todd said. "I don't know how the process would work to suggest that. I believe that if more students wanted to have more of a voice I'm sure that they would hear that."

Tech commencement is Friday, May 15.

Continue Reading:  « Previous12

Leave a comment 9 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Anonymous | # May 1, 2009 @ 1:50 AM — Flag Comment

An editor wrote this peace of crap, sigh, here's a tip not every sentence needs to be it's own line. There's a crazy technique advanced writers are trying out, what we do is group sentences together based on a common theme and call these groupings "paragraphs." I know what your thinking Sara it's a radical idea, but it gets even crazier. Some people have even taken these "paragraphs" and grouped them together with an introduction and conclusion and use a common thesis mentioned in the introduction to link the "paragraphs" together. They call this far out creation a paper, I know its crazy.

Reply to this Top


Tom Minogue | # May 1, 2009 @ 2:27 AM — Flag Comment

The heavy hand of political correctness strikes again.

Reply to this Top


Mike | # May 1, 2009 @ 10:49 AM — Flag Comment

"Anonymous," while your sarcasm probably enhances your superiority complex, you might try researching newspaper reporting before you judge. In most professional publications, it is common to separate each individual thought into its own paragraph, called a "graph" for short in a news article. Those individual thoughts are often only one sentence because straight-forward articles serve to be concise and informative. Just so you know, your quick-to-judge thoughts really add nothing to the intellectual conversation regarding the topic of this article.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # May 1, 2009 @ 11:17 AM — Flag Comment

Mike you must not know the burden of being smarter than most people. I see what you are saying but if you look up at the article most of those sentences should not have been separated into their own paragraph. Her writing is lazy and childish. Here's a few lines put together without any text being changed. "Todd explained that the committee wanted to create more transparency about commencement and that every final decision was posted on the Web site as it developed. Todd said she did not feel like the students were underrepresented on a panel that contained only one student member. "If they have questions about student representation, I never felt like I couldn't say anything," Todd said. However, she agreed that an increased student representation would be useful."Obviously the more input we could have the better," Todd said. "I don't know how the process would work to suggest that. I believe that if more students wanted to have more of a voice I'm sure that they would hear that." Do you understand my grievance now Mike those sentences should not have been separated they are a paragraph but miss edgy editor wrote this article like a twitter post.

Reply to this Top


ugh CT | # May 1, 2009 @ 3:08 PM — Flag Comment

its Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, and it should not be surrounded by quotation marks. do you guys actually edit these things?

Reply to this Top


hokienomics | # May 4, 2009 @ 9:18 AM — Flag Comment

Go get em Quynh! You should never have to listen to someone whose opinions you don't like! It doesn't matter if they're accomplished federal judges, you're obviously smarter and better than all of them! This is why everyone hates UVA.

Reply to this Top


@Anonymous | # May 5, 2009 @ 1:21 AM — Flag Comment

Enlighten us to the ways of news reporting 101 and write for the CT. The world will be a million times better for it. Please don't deprive us from your overwhelming talent. What a tool...

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # May 5, 2009 @ 7:28 AM — Flag Comment

She padded that article by making each sentence its own paragraph. If you arrange them correctly its a laughably short news story. You object but someone has to call her out for lazy writing and from the sound of things I bet you work for the CT. The only people I've witnessed defend this rag are the staff.

Reply to this Top


Londoner/NewYorker | # May 7, 2009 @ 8:16 PM — Flag Comment

@ anonymous below, well, you're actually AT CT's website if that's any news for ya... What do you expect?

Reply to this Top