A timeline of events involving the missing mental health records.
Gov. Tim Kaine's spokesman said the Virginia Tech governor's review panel would not be reconvened, a request of many families of the April 16 shooting victims following the discovery of gunman Seung-Hui Cho's mental health records.
Over 60 family members signed a petition urging Kaine to revise the state's official report after former Cook Couseling Center director Robert Miller located and returned Cho's files.
"While we appreciate the hard work of the Virginia Tech Review Panel, the report issued by the Panel contains grave errors, misinformation, and glaring omissions," the statement said.
However, Kaine spokesman Gordon Hickey said TriData, a private information systems management company that aided the Governor's Review Panel in the initial investigation, would expand upon the report.
Hickey said Kaine invited families and university personnel to submit new facts and information they think should be added to the report during meetings last fall. He said information related to Cho's records would be included should the documents be released to the public.
Cathy Read, whose daughter Mary Read was killed in Norris Hall, submitted an extensive compilation of proposed corrections to the governor's office, according to e-mails obtained by the Collegiate Times.
After receiving those documents, Kaine offered the opportunity on July 7 for the university and victims' families to submit proposed corrections and additions. Submissions are due Aug. 19, at which time TriData will revise the report.
Additionally, Hickey said Kaine would meet with the families two more times before leaving office.
The settlement signed by all but two of the families provided that Kaine would meet with the families three times, including once in "early 2009" and once more before leaving office. He has already met with the families once, in fall 2008.
He has not yet met with the families in 2009.
Suzanne Grimes, whose son Kevin Sterne was injured in Norris Hall, said families have been motivated to seek a revised version of the panel's report.
"I don't understand why the families, especially families of the deceased, have to spend countless hours trying to figure out what happened," Grimes said.
Grimes also attempted to submit information for the report. She said her revisions were originally handed to Kaine's former legal counsel Larry Roberts at the October 2008 meeting of families and state personnel.
However, those papers were lost, and she sent new information this week.
She said the families felt it was important for an outside source to examine information related to the shootings.
"We need a neutral party, unlike officials from Virginia Tech," Grimes said.
The governor's panel, which consisted of officials who volunteered to investigate the circumstances surrounding the shootings, convened in April 2007 and published its report in August of 2007.
Grimes said the panel did not have adequate information at the time.
"We've discovered a lot of new information that the panel wasn't given," Grimes said. "That raises more questions."
No family members were interviewed during the initial investigation.
Kaine does not plan to reconvene the panel.
University spokesman Larry Hincker released a statement Tuesday afternoon, stating that a decision on the panel should be made only after viewing the files.
"The decision to involve the Massengill Panel in future deliberations belongs to Governor Kaine. At this point, the only new information is the discovery of the counseling center records. We believe that their contents should drive a decision. It is for that reason that we strongly urge the Cho estate to approve release of the files," Hincker said.
University personnel did not interact directly with the panel investigation. All requests for statements or interviews were handled through specially appointed liaison Lenwood McCoy. Confusion arose in June 2007 over the whereabouts of Cho's mental health records, as all university information was filtered through McCoy.
McCoy, formerly university controller, returned to the university from retirement, and now serves as associate vice president for special initiatives.
In a May 16, 2007, e-mail, Steger instructed all university employees to contact McCoy to "clear and coordinate all responses to requests for information relative to the events of April 16, including those that originate from individuals or groups other than the Panel."
The e-mail said in the event of receiving requests for information, university employees should "not respond directly; rather, forward the request to Mr. McCoy."
While university spokesman Mark Owczarski said last week that Miller was interviewed in the university's internal investigation, the Governor's Review Panel did not interview him during its investigation.
The panel requested Cho's records in June 2007, but did not receive any detailed mental health reports.
Leave a comment 5 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
To the families who signed Kaine's bribe to prevent you from suing Va Tech; you have been duped. Since when does Kaine have to pay anyone for appearences. He's the ELECTED rep of the people of Virginia and it is his DUTY to meet the electorate of Va. Kaine doesn't give a hoot about you and your losses. He only cares to protect Va Tech from you.
Reply to this Top
The families should just create their own panel and issue their own official report.
Reply to this Top
Sadly there will never be a good resolution for this and nobody will ever truly have the answers that they want. The families have done a lot of investigating and research and found out a lot of bad and incorrect information that was given by the University in this regard. We will now never truly know exactly what was held in Cho's file even if it is released to the public. Since it was at someones residence for years, there is no way to fully know if the information contained is everything that was in the file. Families not only now have to deal with this Doctor having the file for this long, but now they will never truly know what was in it. They will always have questions and doubts and not get straight answers. They will be left with a feeling that the University was far more interested in a cover-up than in looking after the students and victims. Even if the Doctor honestly did "find" the records, which is not likely, you can't take back the feelings that come with this. The doctor should have never had the records and in doing so, he has done far more damage honestly than could be done if the records were immediately discovered in Cook that day several years ago.
Reply to this Top
Kaine will be out of office soon, and I am guessing McDonnell won't mind re-convening the panel one iota.
Reply to this Top
Your diagram concerning Dr. Miller's leaving the CCC in Sept of 2006 is wrong. He was fired from the CCC in Feb of 2006
Reply to this Top