The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute concluded drivers who text are over 20 times more likely to crash than those driving while not using a phone.
VTTI conducted several large-scale, naturalistic driving studies, using cameras and instrumentation in participants' personal vehicles. Combined, these studies continuously observed drivers for more than 6 million miles of driving.
A new bill to ban texting or sending emails messages while driving was introduced into Congress a day after the release of the results from VTTI's results.
According to the Washington Post, the bill would force states to write laws to prohibit messaging in vehicles or risk losing 25 percent of their annual federal highway money.
Federal lawmakers have used similar strategies to force states to curb speeding and pass seat-belt laws.
The new legislation would also set deadlines for regulators at the U.S. Department of Transportation to devise minimum penalties for states to implement. States would have two years to enact their own laws.
The District and 13 states, including Virginia, already have driver texting bans in place or scheduled to become effective his year. Maryland's ban takes effect Oct. 1.
Text messaging on a cell phone was associated with the highest risk of all cell phone related tasks in the VTTI study.
Through the study, text messaging was shown to have the longest time where eyes are off the road--4.6 seconds over a 6 second interval. This equates to a driver traveling the length of a football field at 55 mph without looking at the roadway.
The study also showed drivers using headsets are just as likely to be involved in traffic accidents as drivers using a handheld device.
According to VTTI's study for driving light vehicles or cars, dialing a cell phone increases risk of crash or near crash event by 2.8 times compared to non-distracted driving and 5.9 times as high for heavy vehicles or trucks.
For light vehicles or cars, talking or listening on a cell phone raises the risk of a crash or near crash event 1.3 times over non-distracted driving and 1.0 times over for heavy vehicles or trucks.
Reaching for an object such as an electronic device causes drivers to be 1.4 times more likely to crash or nearly crash as non-distracted drivers in light vehicles and 6.7 times more likely for heavy vehicles or trucks.
Drivers of heavy cars or trucks engaging in texting as they drive are at 23.2 times the risk of a crash or near crash event as truckers who do not text message.
VTTI's results show that a real factor for significantly improving safety is keeping eyes on the road. In contrast, "cognitively intense" tasks such as emotional conversations can have a measurable effect in the laboratory, but the actual driving risks are much lower in comparison.
According to VTTI's study, teens are four times more likely go get into a phone-related crash or near crash event than adults in similar situations. Teens tend to engage in cell phone tasks much more frequently, and in much more risky situations than adults.
Based on the finding from research studies, VTTI recommends that drivers should always avoid texting and dialing while on the roadway.
They also recommend that text messaging should be banned in moving vehicles for all drivers and all cell phone use should be banned for newly licensed teen drivers.

Leave a comment 10 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
It's already illegal to be a dangerous driver - this comes in laws about speeding, lane changes, obeying signs and many other ways. There's no reason to add laws about text messaging. It's already illegal to drive without any regard for those around you, but people still do it and outlawing another thing is not going to make anyone safer.
Reply to this Top
Why not also make gameboy and crossword puzzles illegal. Is it really necessary? Isn't it obvious that if you are in a moving car, doing something other than driving, it's dangerous?
Reply to this Top
no quotes? seriously? talk to a fricken human being
Reply to this Top
Great info, not looking at the road while driving is potentially dangerous. Is there a study quantifying the results of drivers who are asleep at the wheel and if that should be outlawed as well? Anyone know if there is a law requiring you to be awake while driving? I can see NBC's "The More You Know" commercial already.
Reply to this Top
The Commonwealth government uses a study from one of its own Commonwealth schools and that is supposed to be considered a valid study? Is this any different than drug companies studying the safety of their own drugs?
Reply to this Top
Karen, are you suggesting that the VT study was influenced by the state's agenda? It would seem more likely that the study was being done anyway, and once the results were available, it was used in the process of developing the new legislation. I agree with the first two posters. Especially with the minimal $20 fine for texting, it's far more likely that people will be cited for symptoms of texting (erratic driving, for example), than for texting itself.
Reply to this Top
Any word on how much this study cost? And if it was done with public funds? I am sure the study had a broader scope than quantifying the dangers of texting. Amazing a new bill was introduced a day after the study concluded. I guess some things really matter to the legislature after all.
Reply to this Top
Federal government BLACKMAIL.
Reply to this Top
Light Step,much commercial mention vision worry authority fall population type brother weekend wear financial seem until me improve unemployment no develop next warn chemical succeed ever advantage survey lead set settlement compare certain accept need vary chance brother holiday recently feel design effect fear examine accident speed hear separate all will check legal dangerous meaning club use daughter lie weekend press that charge itself promise driver justice separate prison strength trip asset heat aspect state protection year yesterday strike arrangement view consequence replace freedom wait operation currently remain wait list somewhat
Reply to this Top
Formal Protection,estate artist damage perform complete leadership museum severe train difficulty scene military seat condition cabinet hit pocket interview eye other drive crowd city my winter her past second secondary structure therefore generate remain high train middle bit would retain external flower kid power gentleman conference eye lay organisation mark division again organisation method grey church about i launch rare love author visit master say negotiation later sister regional property page sister farm basic exactly potential pretty picture ensure competition crowd arrive famous secretary
Reply to this Top