One of the first civic doctrines American schoolchildren are taught is the principle of majority rule.
Indeed, this idea, heavily championed by President Andrew Jackson, is essential in democratic and republic societies such as our own - whether it is in a state's gubernatorial election (a quick reminder here of the upcoming election here in Virginia) or simply just a class picking on which day to have a test, the side with the most votes always carries the day. That's all well and good; America's favorite doctrine solves another dispute. What majority rule fails to consider is another doctrine - though less well known - inherent to free societies: that of minority rights.
Minority rights are those rights, which, to borrow from Jefferson, are inalienable, no matter how exceeding the majority is. To again borrow from the Declaration of Independence, life and liberty, for example, can never be stripped from the side that is left lacking in votes. The reason I can say this idea is inherent to American society is because it is embedded in the document that gave birth to American government - the Constitution. This is clear just from the First Amendment. As former Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said, "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other, it is the principle of free thought - not free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate."
As I write this, the day is Friday, September 11. Therefore, as you read these words, I hope you can allow yourself to find the appropriate mindset. Think back to when you were but 11, 12 or 13 years old and you first heard the news of the towers' fall. Drift forward a little ways to the months and years after, the support everyone gave to the city of New York. But, do you also remember the deep fear that ran through the country? Do you remember our mistrust, our hatred? It is only natural for Americans to have felt that way; it was without question the most horrendous and despicable act of war to happen in the U.S. since the bombing of Pearl Harbor. But while everyone is susceptible to imprudence when mourning, the suffering was compounded in the aftermath of the attacks. Middle Easterners came under scrutiny in airport baggage checks, despite the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection. Many Americans, in a way all-too close to the Red Scare, started seeing dissenters as anti-American. Much like President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Japanese-American Internment Camps in the 1940s, American citizens were being stripped of their rights, justified by the mantra of majority rule.
If history's teachings are not sufficient, consider a world where one faction was so strong that it could fully suppress its opposition. Without minority rights, intellectual, political and organizational opponents could be silenced by the powerful majority. Even in more balanced Washington, the oppressive gaze could instead be directed upon other facets of our lives. New legislation straining small businesses and satiating corporate greed could fall upon the nation. It is not hard to see the ominous consequences of a republic devoid of minority rights.
In 2009, we have been free of major tragedies, and while we are blessed for this, we cannot forget the lessons we had to learn the hard way at the beginning of the decade. There are heated debates raging, with health care being at the top of the list. Whether you align yourself with the Tea-Party conservatives, or if you think they're merely out to ruin the president, keep Holmes' lesson in mind. Because in the end, we're all Americans, and beyond this nation, we're all humans, and, to borrow from Jefferson one last time, we are all endowed with inalienable rights in accordance to the Law of Nature and of Nature's God.
Leave a comment 8 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
Excellent comparison! An Arab-American getting beat up and called derogatory names after 9/11 is exactly like a millionaire facing a 3% tax increase. It is time we stood up for the rights of millionaires. I for one will refuse to receive any medical attention just so some Wall St. fat cat can see his stock ticker go up one quarter of a point. Who else will join me??
Reply to this Top
I will join you if you cast your sarcasm aside. Wall Street fat cats should be punished if they defraud investors or clients, but they should not be held accountable for providing my medical care.
Reply to this Top
"Majority rule." Barf. We are a republic, not a democracy.
Reply to this Top
so...what rights are being taken away? I don't get it. Or was the point just to remember that a minority has rights too? and scott said it was an act of war, that was like a Kevin Nealon Mr Subliminal line
Reply to this Top
"consider a world where one faction was so strong that it could fully suppress its opposition." Umm, you mean like Saudi Arabia? You know, the place where the 9/11 highjackers came from? It may be ugly, but the fact is that profiling is an extremely effective law enforcement tool. Perhaps if the Muslim community were more universal in their condemnation of terrorist attacks on the United States I might feel worse about it.
Reply to this Top
I'm just about fed up with this 'minority rights' crap. how long do they have to be given preference for things before it becomes discrimination? I thought the goal of NAACP and minority groups like that were to make it an level playing field. Seriously guys - if you want preferential treatment... just ask for it. But I'm tired of hearing about how terrible minorities are treated, when the tables are clearly shifted in their favor.
Reply to this Top
did you even read the article??? it is not about affirmative action, it's about voting minorities and human rights.
Reply to this Top
Photographic evidence was once considered to be proof positive of an event. However, the advent of digital image editing programs has made it harder to trust what you see in a picture. Photoshop, the leading image editor on the market, is often used to make sneaky edits or even outright fake images that can be difficult to detect. However, there are some online forensics tools that may help you on this, like: <a href="http://www.pskiller.com/">Photoshopped Image Killer</a>.
Reply to this Top