Related
- Health care needs mandate
- Don't go silent when politicans go astray
- Voters need to be both responsible and educated
TOPICS: war in afghanistan, barack obama
Over the course of the past two months Gen. Stanley McChrystal and President Barack Obama have been engaged in a very public stalemate concerning the strategy of the war in Afghanistan. On Aug. 31, McChrystal issued his report to the White House in which he asked for 40,000 additional troops on top of the 68,000 American forces and 100,000 NATO forces already there. As of late September, Obama only had two meetings concerning the recommendation. On the other hand, Obama is also considering the proposal of a strategy that includes more drone attacks and increased Special Forces operations. Reminiscent of the “light footprint” strategy advocated by
Donald Rumsfeld, this is a strategy that McChrystal flatly rejects and one that Vice President Joe Biden supports.
When asked about this strategy in London on Oct. 1, McChrystal plainly said “no” and that “waiting does not prolong a favorable outcome. This effort will not remain winnable indefinitely, and nor will public support,” alluding to the fact that the “light footprint” strategy will take longer to win the war
So this leads to the question of why it is taking Obama so long to make his decision. It is not as if McChrystal woke up one morning and decided he needed 40,000 more troops for the hell of it. His recommendation is based on a very calculated strategy planned by commanders on the ground in Afghanistan and the likes of National Security Advisor Gen. James Jones.
The amount of depth the military goes into to make decisions and plan strategies is astounding, and those in Washington need to take that into perspective. It is not a political game to military commanders; it is their duty and their job to make important and calculated decisions in the best interest of the United States. Unlike politicians, generals do not campaign for their jobs — they work for them.
So does Obama believe that by pushing his decision back the problem in Afghanistan will magically disappear? What is he waiting for? Some in the media have argued he is literally still campaigning and was waiting for certain state gubernatorial elections to end. This may be a little far-fetched, but the possibility should not be ignored completely.
The biggest problem here, however, is Obama’s pledge to win the war in Afghanistan. All throughout his campaign and thus far into his presidency all we have heard is how he will win the war in Afghanistan. If so, wouldn’t that include listening to his military commanders on the ground instead of some random military theory that drone strikes and increased special forces operations will win this war?
While I do not doubt the courage of the brave men in the special forces of the United States, putting tens of thousands of more boots on the ground makes a significant difference on what the other side can and cannot do. It is McChrystal’s job to know what the U.S. needs to win this war. His sole focus is the war on Afghanistan, not on health care, not on abortion, not on oil, not on gun rights, not on gun control, not on crime rates, not on Smart cars — do you see my point?
Obama needs to wake up and make a decision. His honeymoon period is over. He needs to stop making his rounds on late night TV shows and having petty shouting matches with Fox News. He has too many issues he needs to focus on instead of constantly campaigning to bolster his image. It is time for him to stand up and become the president that we elected, not sit around and wait for someone to make the decision for him.


Leave a comment 6 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
By submitting your comment, you agree that it will not:
Comments that violate these guidelines will be moderated by the public editor and will then be buried in the comments section.
How about some insight into Obama's decision making process: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfOFhrMdMd8&feature=related
Reply to this Top
We're going to be waiting a long time then. Military strategy isn't something that can be learned in a short period of time. Consider this:
McChrystal is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point. Afterwards, he completed the Special Forces Officer Course at Special Forces School at Ft Bragg, and also attended the Infantry Officer Advanced Course at Ft Benning.
He's got a Bachelor's of Science from the United States Military Academy, a Master of Arts degree in National Security and Strategic Studies from the United States Naval War College, and a Master of Science degree in International Relations from Salve Regina University.
By the time Obama would learn even a MINUTE amount of what General McChrystal knows about strategy, his term would already be over. Obama delegates authority so that he doesn't HAVE to learn all those things, but what's the point of delegating that authority if he makes no use of the knowledge and solutions presented to him?
Reply to this Top
While agree his academic credentials are impressive, more important is General McChrystal's experience. He has more than 33 years in uniform, over which time he has served at every level of command and staff. Most relevent to the current situation is his time in Iraq. Having spent more than five years on the ground there both when it was at its lowest and highest points. He commanded the black task forces that captured Saddam Hussein and killed Abu Mus'ab al-Zarqawi. He was there during the surge and knows first hand the importance of conducting such operations within the framework of security so the populace feels safe enough to support the efforts. In short, General McChrystal knows counterinsurgency both academically and practically.
The biggest proponent of the small footprint strategy is Joe Biden. His military experience is limited to securing five draft deferrments during Vietnam. Oh, wait, I almost forgot. His son is the Attorney General of the Delaware National Guard. Maybe Beau regales his father of his combat exploits, issuing Rules of Engagement rulings.
Top
Maybe I'm wrong but delaying is what Obama is waiting for. And he's not waiting for Karzai and a "stable" Afghani gov't either. What he's doing is delaying until public opinion of the war becomes so negative, he can swoop in and pull out with the excuse "its what the people wanted". It's a slick strategy but perhaps an effective one. See, right now it's a tough choice. The Obama Administration doesn't want to make a tough choice for fear of the consequences. He's already looking to 2012. If he makes a choice that doesn't quite work out now, it'll bite him later. Once public opinion of the war gets negative, he make a decision will little flack. It's typical politics. It's not what's best for the troops or the country, it's what's best for the Administration.
Reply to this Top
maybe he is secretly establishing a larger coalition of partners in the war against mass casualty inducers? hopefully the 40,000 can come from somewhere else. it doesn't necessarily have to be from the US.
Reply to this Top
President Obama is reluctant to accept McChrystal's strategy because history shows that troop count doesn't win wars in Afghanistan.
Reply to this Top