Big box continues to provoke questions

Monday, November, 9, 2009; 11:10 PM | 11 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: town council town of blacksburg

The long months of campaigning have finally paid off: In January, three citizens will be sworn in to the Blacksburg Town Council for the first time while a fourth holds on to a second term.

The election results, however, are merely the first sentence in the next chapter of Blacksburg history. What remains to be seen is the impact that the newly reshaped council will have on the town.

As the economy continues to fluctuate, a question left in the minds of many is how the council will assist the town’s economic situation. Popular topics during campaigns were job creation, economic help, and the idea of a “big box” store building near to the First & Main development.

“We’re making great economic progress,” said returning council member Susan Anderson. “Our downtown is really starting to explode.”

Anderson said that recent downtown development along with development at First & Main were “quality developments” that she hoped would succeed.

A question in the minds of many, however, is how the council will handle the idea of a “big box” store moving into the First & Main development area.

Anderson, along with others, said that she couldn’t answer that question yet.

Newly-elected member Krisha Chachra said that she would have to wait until the issue arose to give a comment on her opinion, although in a previous Collegiate Times town council Q&A (CT, Oct. 16), she said that she would support “some type of anchor store” in the area.

“So whether it is a movie theater, a store, or high-end office space, I support having something there,” Chachra said.

In the same article, newly-elected member Cecile Newcomb echoed Anderson’s sentiments, saying that she would need to study the potential application to make an informed decision.

Newly elected member John Bush said in the same article that he would like to re-examine the location for a proposed big box store in the future.

It’s difficult for anyone to look into the future, but it’s worth examining how the recent election and a big box store could potentially affect both the politics and economy of Blacksburg.

Associate political science professor Craig Brians said in an e-mail that he doubted the addition of Chachra, Newcomb and Bush would significantly alter the council’s current collective view on big box stores.

“There were candidates running who probably would make changes, but they didn’t win,” Brians said.

The town council that dealt from 2007-08 with the controversial Ordinance 1450, which gave the council greater authority to regulate large-scale retail development in the town, has experienced bumps in the process of filling spots in the First & Main development.

“Right now, First & Main has about 14 empty storefronts,” Anderson said, adding that the council should work to fill those spaces.

“The more there, the more buzz, the more people shop,” she said.

Adding a big box store to the proposed rugby field adjacent to the First & Main development is more controversial, largely because of its proximity to Margaret Beeks Elementary School as well as what she deems to be an unsuitable system of roads potentially unable to support the traffic that would be associated with a large retail store.

The addition of a big box store to Blacksburg would not significantly alter the economy, said Jeff Alwang, a professor of agriculture and applied economics at Tech. It could, however, serve as an anchor to the First & Main development, he said.

“It probably would also lower property values of the surrounding property,” Alwang said.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

Leave a comment 11 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Anon Y. Mous | # November 9, 2009 @ 11:39 PM — Flag Comment

Is it Ordinance 1540 or 1450? You might want to make sure you have it correct before you publish the article.

Reply to this Top


anon | # November 10, 2009 @ 11:24 AM — Flag Comment

It's 1450, to be sure.

Reply to this Top


Bob | # November 10, 2009 @ 12:27 PM — Flag Comment

To consider the expansion to Tech Bookstore a "big box" development is a bit ridiculous. Love those empty storefronts!

Reply to this Top


Fact Checker | # November 10, 2009 @ 3:41 PM — Flag Comment

By any other name it is called "THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS". In trying to 'save us all' from the corporate evil of a well managed retail center the 'frightened little Rugby Field lovers' sold us the notion that this would end our town as we know it. But my children, have no fear. It is clean, it is nice, and it COULD be fully leased if we hadn't been 'frightened' by the tie-dye mafia!!!

Reply to this Top


Jane | # November 10, 2009 @ 12:26 PM — Flag Comment

To this day, I will never understand why the Big Box Kroger store was allowed to be built by Beeks but the First and Main Big Box was stopped.

Reply to this Top


Fact Checker | # November 10, 2009 @ 3:38 PM — Flag Comment

I'll tell you - a little group with a big hippie, dippy mouth and no understanding of economics, development or civics got on their 'high horse' and jammed a bunch of junk down our throats. In the process, they derailed what could have been a fully leased, fully functioning retail center. As we can see, it isn't the big scary monster from hell that they said it would be. It's actually quite nice, very well managed and IF we had a movie theatre, a Sonic and a WalMart (or other anchor) it would be a huge addition to our town. BUT, these fools really messed it up for all of us. BOO!

Reply to this Top


Fact Checker | # November 10, 2009 @ 3:35 PM — Flag Comment

The Tech Book Store is in no way, shape or form a 'big box' store.
It's footprint is about that of the Wachovia Bank Building or National
Bank Building in Downtown Blacksburg.

The only two commercial structures in the 'box' territory are both of our Kroger Stores (one at University Mall and the other on South Main).

One thing we should get built is the movie theatre at First and Main
and what about meeting with the developers to get something a bit more town friendly on the Wal Mart site, such as a Khol's Department Store.

Everyone forgets that the majority of the 'mess' that has been made in complicating and slowing the proper completion of First and Main lies directly in the hands of these people now back pedaling that they are not opposed to the 'box' in theory. All it took was foot dragging right into the gaping jaws of the recession to change their tunes. Same old, same old.

Reply to this Top


Mmm, big box | # November 10, 2009 @ 8:28 PM — Flag Comment

I'm all for a big box store but I hope its not a Wal-Mart. Not because Wal-mart is evil, but because there's one within 10 mins of Blacksburg. 10 freakin' minutes. It's not that big of a deal to get there.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # November 10, 2009 @ 9:38 PM — Flag Comment

I hope they build a nice green lot and just plant some trees there. and they can leave a tip jar in the new park to raise revenue.

Reply to this Top


m | # November 10, 2009 @ 10:44 PM — Flag Comment

It's been long established that the big box is a wal-mart and the developers want to blame the town for their own bad business decisions. there have been three different attempts to bring a movie theater into first and main but they could never get the financing. the reason why there are empty storefronts at first and main or downtown is the economy. who is shopping? malls are emptying out everywhere.
it's the economy stupid.

Reply to this Top


morefacts | # November 11, 2009 @ 10:59 AM — Flag Comment

Ordinance 1450 deals with size, any commercial structure over 80,000 sq. feet requires a special use permit. The real estate and developer backed interests who fought the ordinance had argued that 1450 would make it impossible for businesses to expand or even attempt to bring in businesses over 80,000 sq feet because the ordinance was prohibitive. When Anderson talks about our other "big boxes" she is speaking in terms of the ordinance, which deals with size, not type and making the point that SUPS were granted without trouble to the two businesses who applied. She is not saying that the Tech bookstore or the expanded Krogers is comparable to a Wal-Mart in type, she is comparing them in terms of the need for a SUP. Interestingly enough, when Ordinance 1509 was proposed, which requires a SUP for commercial sites over 50,000 sq. feet, it was unanimously approved without any controversy at all. No drama, just another SUP and developers have to deal with SUPS all the time whether it be putting in a drive-through or a home trailer. This one just happens to deal with size.

Reply to this Top