News networks should be responsible with broadcasts

Monday, November, 16, 2009; 11:16 PM | 12 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: media television

For those who watched last week’s episode of South Park, you will remember a stinging commentary on Glenn Beck and Fox News. However, sadly enough, this is the state of most television news organizations today, left and right.

Rather than giving the American people the facts that they need to make an informed decision, today’s television news networks sensationalize and exaggerate every story, big or small. Whenever I happen to turn on CNN, Fox News or CNBC, I usually find that they are covering scandalous and exciting stories of little relevance, about obscure topics and useless events.

While they could be properly informing the American people about the current state of the health care bill in the Senate, or nuclear relations with Iran, we instead learn of numerous sex scandals around the country and how much John F. Kennedy’s autograph went for at an auction. Neither of these stories is relevant to anyone but the people directly affected. Also, some of these stories are private personal issues that I am sure those negatively affected do not want making national headlines.

One of the biggest problems in televised news today is the problem of ratings. At some point, the major news networks decided that they were going to become dependent on ratings because they were not making enough money, and they therefore became more like television shows rather than news broadcasts. These networks now only cover those stories that will get them the highest ratings and have the most shock value. However, the most important stories and those that matter most to all Americans are not covered properly — they are not covered enough, but more importantly they are not covered in the depth that is needed for people to completely understand the issue or event.

There are some programs such as “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” that do give Americans the facts, but these are publicly-funded by organizations like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. They do not depend on ratings, so they can therefore present the facts as objectively as possible. “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” spends one hour each week on the most important national and international news stories. While it covers fewer topics, it covers them more comprehensively than any television news network could even dream of. As an added bonus, the top story of the week is often an international story of great importance, a story that would not earn the high ratings that other networks are looking for. This concentration on ratings is one of the largest contributors to the pathetically misinformed American population today.

But there is another significant and alarming problem with television news networks today, and that is political and ideological bias in the news. The worst offender, as most would agree, is Fox News, which claims to be objective and unbiased while having a ridiculous right-wing slant that plagues every program on the network. It claims in its primetime broadcast to be balanced and fair-minded, but it is clearly and ludicrously slanted to the right. Even the supposed “experts,” such as Bill Bennett, that are on its programs are conservative and are historically involved with former Republican governments or organizations.

While CNN and MSNBC do have a left-wing bias, they do what they can to keep it out of their prime time broadcasts, and the other programs with a clear bias do not claim to be neutral, as all of Fox News’ programs seem to. Wolf Blitzer’s primetime broadcast on CNN does its best to keep from having a liberal slant and additionally does not consistently claim to have no bias. He gives the news, and while it is mostly underdeveloped and superficial, it is usually not prejudiced.

Americans today often wonder why there is so little being done politically, and people are so utterly misinformed about America’s most important issues — I say it’s caused by our television news networks. We need the straight facts presented in the most objective manner possible to become properly informed about national and international issues. Ratings need to be eliminated as a concern when presenting the news, or many news networks are destined to become no more than propaganda outlets.

Leave a comment 12 Comments Write a letter to the editor

JohnG | # November 17, 2009 @ 12:05 AM — Flag Comment

I say our television news networks are caused by it's viewers. South Park, as always, is highly relevant to this. In "Something Wall-Mart This Way Comes", the South Park children are told if they want to destroy Wal-Mart, they must destroy it's heart. It's heart turns out to be a mirror. Just like Walmart, news networks must compete for your business. If you don't want that, maybe Pravda would be more to your liking.

Reply to this Top


JohnG | # November 17, 2009 @ 12:07 AM — Flag Comment

Also, every channel, every news show, every news person has a bias. Some more readily admit it then others. See "The Double Standard About Journalists' Bias" http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2009/11/04/the_double_standard_about_journalists_bias

Reply to this Top


John F | # November 17, 2009 @ 12:18 AM — Flag Comment

I would not say CNN has a liberal bias. They try to give just the news, no opinion. However, the 'news' they give sometimes seems like a tabloid. MSNBC does tend to have a liberal slant, but their liberal commentators (Olbermann, Maddow) openly acknowledge this. It should also be noted that MSNBC gives 3 hours everyday to Joe Scarborough, a former Republican congressman, so there is some attempt at balance on the network. Faux News is the worst. Ever since Alan Colmes left, no liberals have significant air time on that network. Then they go to efforts to claim no bias; "Fair and Balanced", "No Spin Zone", etc. I prefer C-SPAN - no commercials!

Reply to this Top


John Q | # November 17, 2009 @ 7:33 AM — Flag Comment

South Park, really??

Reply to this Top


Ouuwahh? | # November 17, 2009 @ 11:48 AM — Flag Comment

The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer spends one hour each week on the most important national and international news stories."

Uh...NewsHour is on every weekday on PBS. Sheesh, your lack of fact-checking is making Kwame Holman wince.

Reply to this Top


NewsHour? | # November 17, 2009 @ 2:54 PM — Flag Comment

"While it covers fewer topics, it covers them more comprehensively than any television news network could even dream of."


The libs really working overtime at Collegiate times trying to brain wash all those young naive skulls on campus.

Most all the guest are from a liberal, leftist, socialist, viewpoint. They all voted for Obama for goodness sake. One even wrote a book and profited from her Obama Love.

Please people don't drink the Koolaid this liberal rag is trying force down your throat.

NewsHour??????????????Un-freakin-Believeable.

Try reading and listening to news from around the world and get the BIG picture.

Reply to this Top


Knock knock | # November 17, 2009 @ 3:01 PM — Flag Comment

Ever been here Gabi?

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/

Guess what there are over 6 billion people outside the US borders that don't give a crap about 150 +/- million of you liberal loonies yours or my rights or your liberal mantra.....


Please wake up and expand your mind and horizons.............

Reply to this Top


Knock knock knock | # November 17, 2009 @ 3:05 PM — Flag Comment

Did NewHour report the story in this light? or even come close?

http://www.gloria-center.org/Gloria/2009/11/why-i-murdered.html

Reply to this Top


Newshour with Gwen Ifil | # November 17, 2009 @ 3:27 PM — Flag Comment

The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama,


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26978194/

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # November 17, 2009 @ 5:41 PM — Flag Comment

news channels are giving people what they want. if they dont they will get lower ratings since people dont watch. its the people that watch the news that suck Gabi, dont blame channels. perhaps a network with a slogan "We're responsible so you don't have to be" is what Gabi needs.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # November 17, 2009 @ 9:06 PM — Flag Comment

wow an article saying fox news is bad mmmkay. instead of hating on them, you could try putting out a better news product. or you could complain that the media reports on irrelevant topics in an article that proves your own point in a less than relevant article

Reply to this Top


Kendra | # November 18, 2009 @ 7:02 AM — Flag Comment

For those of you think CNN isn't bias ~ have you been sleeping? They are reporting more on the 3 dead Iraq's then on all of the good that US soldiers do/also never report on the torture of US soldiers. Why don't we hear from CNN about how these men keep re-listing? NO ONE forces them to do so, they re-enlist because they WANT to. I love it that the "liberal: people out there are so scared of Sarah Palin ...at least w/her you know what you're getting. Obama can't even speak w/out someone telling him what to say, yet alone the stupid way he carries himself says enough about him.

Reply to this Top