Coal center
“It’s a great opening shot but the resolution is too generic, with vague language,” Oppenheimer said. “The plan was comprehensive, but the resolution cut out all the hard parts.”
“Burning carbon fuels cannot be sustained into the infinite future,” Myers said. “We need to merge with technology.”
Tech is currently testing the practice of burning coal with another material. Switchgrass, a renewable source cleaner than coal or other fossil fuels, is currently the most viable option, Cochrane said.
It is also native to the region, which would reduce transportation costs and pollution.
After a period of using both switchgrass and coal, the results will be measured and the situation will be assessed.
Tech also hired Pepco, an energy service company, to do an audit of six buildings on campus. This audit assesses energy use and produces substantial ideas to make Tech more energy efficient.
While advances in technology will open more doors for Tech in the energy sector, Director of Green Engineering Sean McGinnis believes Tech needs to take action now.
“We can’t just wait for new technology, McGinnis said. “We need to act now.”
He believes the focus needs to be on more immediate goals of efficiency and conservation. McGinnis said these options, including simple investments in fluorescent light bulbs and turning off lights, are easy and cheap, McGinnis said.
Changes to the plant itself, however, can only be accomplished in the longer term. They would take approximately 20 years, McGinnis said. Boilers would need to be upgraded and more sustainable materials would be utilized.
“This is the most costly and takes the most time,” McGinnis said. “If we just move to a new technology without focusing on efficiency or conservation, we are still throwing energy away.”
Changing ideas and behaviors when it comes to personal conservation comes with its own fair share of difficulties, however.
“Most people aren’t willing to change their lifestyles drastically,” McGinnis said.
Whether it’s personal responsibility or collective action, leaders agree only a broad, sustained effort can achieve real environmental change at Tech.
Cochrane said that teamwork is the only way for Tech to reach its objective of reducing energy usage and conserving energy that we need.
“All buildings (on campus) are affected by the steam plant,” he said.
Protest calls for end of coal by 2020
With chants of “No coal, Hokies,” scores of students gathered outside the Graduate Life Center at Donaldson Brown to celebrate No Coal Day on Nov 18.
Approximately 60 students attended the rally, organized by the Virginia Tech Beyond Coal campaign.
“Our university tagline is invent the future,” said Bryce Carter, a student and former town council candidate. “I say, let’s invent the right future.”
The rally was one of many held across Virginia on college campuses such as Roanoke College and The College of William and Mary.
Richard Rich, professor of political science, spoke out against the use of coal at Tech, comparing it to apartheids of the mid-to-late 1900s.
Rich said that universities rid themselves of investments with businesses in South Africa, knowing they could make a profit, but also knowing that it was “wrong.”
“With all we know about the bad effects of coal, we need to divest because it’s the right thing to do,” Rich said.
Beyond Coal proposes that the university commission a study to develop a plan to cease coal use in the on-campus steam plant within a year. In the same timeframe, the organization is pushing for creating an inventory of coal sources and ceasing coal purchases from mountaintops.
“Lastly, we ask to stop burning coal in the cogeneration plant by 2020,” said Kara Dodson, coalition facilitator for Beyond Coal.
Dodson announced that its leaders would meet with members of the administration, including Vice President for Administrative Services Sherwood Wilson and Associate Vice President for Facilities Mike Coleman, on Dec. 2.
“This is about saving the soul of the university,” Rich said.
Continue Reading: « Previous12

Leave a comment 17 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
Saving the soul of the university give me a break. How about we save the students at Tech some green by keeping energy prices down. If you want to talk about sustainability we have enough coal to last us over a 1000 years, natural gas is projected at 150 years tops. Tech has already taken enough steps to meet the needs of the EPA and still has improved on the cleanliness of the plant. We've done more than our fair share, coal is an important part of our future energy needs. It's not the evil boogieman you sierra clubbers think it is. Especially in a time when Tech is in a budget crisis we do not need to replace an economical energy source with a less efficient and more expensive one. There is an economic argument here that is being completely ignored by the environmental side and until you guys can adequately address it you're not going to gain support.
Reply to this Top
Anonymous, I agree with you on only one point; we do need to save money on campus and that can be easily reflected by creating a realistic and innovative plan to end our use of coal on campus.
And no one said that coal is the boogeyman. When I speak out against coal, I'm referencing the coal industries that pressure mountain communities into unhealthy and unsustainable jobs while ruining Appalachia. I'm referencing the terrifying ecological, human and economic consequences of rising carbon emissions and worsening climate change.
And if you don't believe in global warming, there are still more reasons to end our addiction to cheap, but destructive, coal. Coal seams are natural water filters; so when we knock over mountain top for that coal we're not only losing a natural protectant for our waterways, we're stopping and polluting the headwater of the Appalachia region. There are direct health issues related to mining practices, burning coal, CCS, etc.
Environmentalists pay taxes and want cheap energy too. We're all in this together whether you realize it or not.
Reply to this Top
Well Kara I'm not saying no to change for the sake of not changing. I'm saying no because I don't make to pay more for energy or have anyone else pay more. You are right that there are externalities to the use of coal but you are also correct in assuming I'm unconvinced by the evidence for climate change. I'm not saying the coal plant should never be replaced I'm saying we should wait until the technology improves and we are in a better budget situation. That way we can do this with as little a cost as possible to the student body. We're in bad straits right now gov't funding is being slashed and our football team isn't making a BCS bowl this year. Tech is out alot of money tuition is going to go up enough as is lets wait a few years on this one.
Top
Your right that this is an issue of economics. But it seems as if you are simply turning a blind eye to the complete economy of coal. We've been charging the true costs to future generations by failing to account for the complete costs of the destruction rendered by Mountain Top Removal, failing to use CO2 sequestration and improper disposal of heavy medal laden fly ash.
Reply to this Top
Well, you better get working on fixing that. Ecconomically of course... You should Jane plants as your roof for the CO2 and for the fly ash, just stick it back where we got it, there should be enough mines... We are even putting less material back. Wow, that was hard... NOT
Reply to this Top
Jane=have... Stupid corrections the phone does
Top
There are actually only two coal boilers and three natural gas or fuil oil boilers, they are not all coal.
Reply to this Top
Fuel* for fuil
Reply to this Top
Not going to jump in the debate about the soul of anything...just going to point out that as one of the leading universities in new technology, bio technology, engineering, etc...VA Tech should have not even one second of jumping into the 22nd Century as PROOF of our collective intelligence. There should be a brilliant maze of Photovolic Cells placed atop every single building on this campus
- we are talking millions of square feet of surface area no one ever sees...that alone will remove a certain percentage from the Coal Power Grid...next, we should be leaping ahead in finding the cleanest way to process and use coal IF that even exists. I don't think that ultimately it does...but one can also assume that like them or not...our coal industry is operating at status quo rather than bettering their practices. They can figure out a way to make it "harmless" and I'll be at the front of the line supporting them. Otherwise...
Reply to this Top
(My typing got the best of me, must amend this sentence)...VA Tech should have not even one second of HESITATION ABOUT jumping into the 22nd Century as PROOF of our collective intelligence.
Reply to this Top
Jumping on a bandwagon is not economically sound... prices drop once the bugs have been worked out and the public thinks it is economically sound and a wise investment. If you are one of the first people to buy into an idea, you end up with a inferior product for a larger price. We should wait it out until it becomes economical.
Reply to this Top
This is just asinine. Coal will be a major driver of the of the energy supply of the US for decades to come. The physical plant has installed more emissions controls than what is currently required. Sure they could do more. So could everyone. But there is a cost to everything. Would every student be will to pay an extra $1,000 each year so that the University only uses renewable? Probably not!
Reply to this Top
Great job Hokies!!! As a former Thomas resident I remember coal dust filled screens and bad smells. Not the future I want for the campus or our world. End coal use on campus!!!
Reply to this Top
The coal dust is now being filtered out at the plant. So your worries are actually addressed.
Reply to this Top
Virginia Tech needs live up to its slogan and "invent the future." Coal fueled the Industrial Revolution. But now we're moving at the exponential pace of the technological revolution. Time for a new, sustainable fuel source. Fossil fuels are for dinosaurs.
Reply to this Top
VRFZ technology is not new, it is very clean, effiecient, LEED, and already in use on VT campus as well as many others around the nation. I am in awe that a Director of Green Technology would not be more informed on the benefits of VRF. The answer to your dilema is already on campus. Google Mitsubishi City Multi or reply to e-mail address for more information.
visit www.mrslim.com and click on citymulti.
Reply to this Top
There are so many images on the Web. How can you know whether an image is original or has been edited by Photoshop? Check it out using <a href="http://www.pskiller.com/">Photoshopped Image Killer</a>. Specify your image's URL and the site will do analysis for you automatically.
Reply to this Top