Historic house
Correction: This story has been modified from its original version. — Correction: This article has been modified from its original version. The building and property at 103 S. Main St. had a total assessed value of $419,300 last year.
The house that used to be home to Beverly Taylor’s business sits dormant on Main Street, as its historic home label delays its sale and renovation.
Commonly known as the Bennett-Pugh House or the Taylor’s building, 103 S. Main St. has been unoccupied since 2007. After Taylor’s husband and business partner passed away that year, their self-business, Taylor’s Frames & Things, was forced to close.
Taylor had tried unsuccessfully since 2005 to sell the building and the property on which it sits, which was assessed at $419,300 last year.
The house needs significant work to be brought up to code for use as a commercial or residential location, Blacksburg building official Cathy Cook said.
“There are structural issues,” Cook said, “but it can be fixed with a bit of money.”
In January of 2009, Taylor went before the town Historic Design Review board to request a demolition permit for the house as a condition of selling the property.
The board, however, was reluctant to grant the permit immediately.
John Bush, recently elected Blacksburg Town Council member, was one of the founding members of the Historic Design Review board in 1999 and has served on it continually since its creation.
Bush said that while the main function of the board is advisory only — meaning that most home owners do not have to adhere to board suggestions — the one area in which the board does have mandate control is demolition of what are known as “contributing structures,” those buildings that were 50 or more years old when the board was created in 1999.
When the board was created, a survey was conducted of all historic homes and buildings in the Blacksburg area in order to establish historic districts. Those homes that were 50 plus years old were classified as contributing; those less than 50 years old are known as non-contributing structures.
The contributing structures have been registered not only with the town, but also with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Bush said.
“We have buildings from every time period,” Bush said. “It’s a great, lively mix of buildings.”
The board wishes to help owners preserve and maintain their historic homes and properties. Bush said if homeowners wish to do small renovations, or change the interior of their houses, the board does not care. When homeowners want to perform major construction to the exterior of the building or build an addition, however, the board works with the owner in an advisory review process of the construction plans.
Bush said the only thing the board has “teeth,” or regulatory power, on is the demolition of buildings classified as contributing structures.
“If you own a contributing structure, we feel you really shouldn’t do that (demolish the building),” Bush said. “We prefer that you consider selling that to someone who can use it, not tear it down.”
So when Taylor brought her request for a demolition permit before the board last January, it did not grant it immediately. Instead, it asked her to leave the house on the market for a one-year grace period, in case a buyer could be found.
“The problem,” Bush said, “was that she bought it for more than it was worth, so they couldn’t sell it easily.”
Although Taylor had the house and surrounding property on the market since 2005, the board requires a one-year grace period from the time that the owner requests a demolition permit. Since she didn’t ask until January 2009, the house remained for sale.
Taylor appealed the board’s mandate of leaving the house on the open market for a year to the town council, but the council supported the original decision.
The year has expired, and Taylor can now move forward.
Taylor declined to comment on the specifics of the sale, or on the potential buyers Bush referenced. She also declined to comment on the status of her demolition permit.

Leave a comment 4 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
It would be cool if - as they did with the Alexander Black House - picked up the Taylor's and moved it to a site next to either the Black house creating a historic "compound" (and do a combined fund-raising effort _ seek grants from Historic Preservation Groups)...or it could be moved to the historic 'campus' that's been envisioned adjacent to the Odd Fellow's Hall in "new Town" off Prices Fork Road. That way the house is preserved and the site is cleared for new development to take place.
Reply to this Top
The problem with this idea is that houses lose funding from historical preservation organizations and are taken off of the National Register of HIstoric Places once moved. The reason that the Black House has laid decrepit for five plus years is exactly that-- after moving from its original place within the sixteen blocks, it is no longer a historical place, just a historical object that is out of place. Millions were lost in funding due to this calculation, and I'd hate to see it happen to yet another historic structure.
Reply to this Top
This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)
Reply to this Top
We're an intensively visual society, and yet we're not very good at visually scrutinizing. But if you know what to look for, there are many ways to tell image integrity. <a href="http://www.pskiller.com/">Photoshopped Image Killer</a> is a good example.
Reply to this Top