Desperate need should not be exploited by self-interest

Tuesday, February, 2, 2010; 10:12 PM | 12 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: haiti

We’re going to take a break and role-play for just a moment.

I want you to imagine yourself as a small child who is much too small to fend for yourself. An earthquake has just left you homeless. Your family is missing, and although you can’t quite understand the concept, it is assumed that they are dead.

You wander along the street, remembering what your parents told you about the dangers of child trafficking and talking to strangers. You’re starving. Ahead you see a group of smiling people handing out bottles of water and fresh cooked food. A woman who fulfills your psychological need for a mother even offers you a place to live.

What do you do?

Well, I’d assume you’d go for it — and why not? You have needs, and these people will fulfill them. After weeks of hardship, you find yourself clothed and fed for the very first time. What could be better?

For the purpose of our little role play we will call the organization who has given you this new life the “Christian Rescue Crusaders.” They’re all seemingly good natured people who value helping others.

Yet, like all people, these charitable folks are ruled by self-interest. Still, you’re too young to understand the concept of self-interest. These people have to be the greatest people in the world — they’ve given you all you need.

Everything they have done for you so far is truly a wonderful thing.

After a night’s rest in a crowded room with many other children, you’re ready to start your first day of school. This will begin right after morning prayers.

A lovely young woman, Melissa, tells you about a man named Jesus and his evil counterpart. You were raised in another religion (perhaps no religion at all); however, the woman is speaking in such way where her faith in this person called “God” is an objective
truth.

Perhaps it was Satan who took your home and killed your family. You’re told that you can earn a right to see your mother again as long as you follow the teaching of Melissa and this man named Jesus Christ. Failure to do so will result in never seeing your family again.

How would a child react to such a message? I would react using only a single finger. However, it is unlikely that a small child would do the same thing. This is especially true for a small child who has lost everything.

We were role-playing a little. However, the character we’re discussing is quite real. And organizations like the fictional Christian Rescue Crusaders exist in reality, and come by many names.

After the horrible earthquake that struck Haiti, charity groups all over the world jumped to help those in need — I’m very thankful that the human spirit is capable of such compassion. I just wish the compassion came without the recruitment of desperate souls.

I received a phone call last week from a familiar young lady asking me to donate to her church group. She informed me that they were sending people to Haiti on a mission to set up a school and housing for orphaned children.

Like many of you, I am a broke college student. However, I agreed to give a small donation on one condition: keep religion out of it. The young woman on the phone was shocked at my conditional reply. “Why would we not teach them about Truth and Jesus Christ?” she asked me, as if I wished to pull wool over children’s eyes and deny them some grandiose enlightenment. 

I informed her that I didn’t like the idea of religious organizations using the plight of these orphans as a way of recruiting for religion. I admired the idea of setting up housing and schools, but I just wanted an assurance that these kids would be left to think for themselves.

After several attempts to get my point across, I gave up and was forced to end the conversation.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

A version of this article appeared in the Feb 3 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 12 Comments Write a letter to the editor

John F | # February 3, 2010 @ 1:53 AM — Flag Comment

This reminded me of a short documentary you might like on you tube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WQ0i3nCx60

Hell's Angel

Reply to this Top


Jochebed | # February 3, 2010 @ 9:22 AM — Flag Comment

If a "Christian" organization is NOT promoting Christ and preaching the gospel through their works, they should shut down.

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Mark 8:36

If these groups weren't helping at all, you'd cry foul and call them "unloving".

Can't please everyone. May as well please God.

Reply to this Top


Brady | # February 3, 2010 @ 9:42 AM — Flag Comment

Psalm 68:5
A father to the fatherless, a defender of widows, is God in his holy dwelling

Exodus 22:22
Do not take advantage of a widow or an orphan.

See, anyone can quote the bible. Helping those in need is God's message, and someone who goes to Haiti for the sole purpose of helping out isn't going to "lose his own soul". Why do you feel the need to force your beliefs on them too?

Reply to this Top


Jochebed | # February 3, 2010 @ 11:50 AM — Flag Comment

Helping those in need IS God's message...and the greatest way in which one can be helped is by being saved. If all a Christian group does is feed someone...but they don't get born again and die and go to hell, eternally they did that person no good.

I never said that someone going there just to feed someone would lose their soul.

Why do I need to "force" my beliefs? Because I am commanded to do so. If they don't want to hear it, if you don't want to hear it, you're free to walk away. My feelings won't be hurt.

Top


Kara | # February 3, 2010 @ 2:53 PM — Flag Comment

Thank you Chad for an enlightening article for college students to fully consider the effects of donating to a religious organization for aid purposes. Instead, we can donate to secular, professional organizations, such as Oxfam International, that work for the SOLE PURPOSE of helping those in need. The fact that religious organizations impose their beliefs (directly and indirectly) on the helpless is disheartening and evil in itself.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 3, 2010 @ 6:55 PM — Flag Comment

man these religious groups sound a lot like the democrat party. giving sustenance to those in need while soliciting support for their cause. why cant they just do it out of generosity rather than to strengthen their groups?

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 4, 2010 @ 7:52 PM — Flag Comment

you're assuming it's true because Chad said it? that's worse than anything any religious group could do.

and on that note, it is seriously devoid of intelligence to presume that because a group acts for what they believe in (God, here) that it is in self-interest.

Chad, this is your worst article so far. quite off the radar.

Reply to this Top


Matt S. | # February 4, 2010 @ 9:27 PM — Flag Comment

I'm sorry...wouldn't someone acting for what they believe in be the definition of self-interest?

I don't think Chad is opposing ALL self interest, but rather he seems to be opposing directly this idea of using tragedy as a means to boost missionary work.

Top


Anonymous | # February 5, 2010 @ 11:28 AM — Flag Comment

Matt, you clearly don't understand "self-interest" or "using tragedy." Giving time and money to help others and offering people the opportunity to join a religious group is not self-interest. Similarly, to "use" a tragedy the person would have to get some kind of gain.

If you go out and recruit for a student org, is that acting in self-interest?

Top


Matt S. | # February 5, 2010 @ 3:54 PM — Flag Comment

Of course it is! You want members.

I don't think self-interest is a bad thing. I also don't think the writer of this article thinks self-interest is a bad thing.

The issue is simply with THESE groups using tragedy to spread religion.

Reply to this Top


Mark Goldstein | # February 8, 2010 @ 7:51 PM — Flag Comment

A great piece, Chad. Using this tragedy as a means of religious recruitment is an incredibly self-serving thing to do.

Reply to this Top


Jayton Gill | # February 11, 2010 @ 4:50 PM — Flag Comment

This piece reminded me of Richard Dawkins's firm belief -- with which I strongly agree -- that indoctrinating young minds with religious belief is a form of mental child abuse. It is noble to help those in need, but using charity as a soapbox for proselytizing, particularly to children, is repulsive.

Reply to this Top