Perhaps the greatest hurdle we will face this century will be how to reconcile our human ambition with our environmental health. At the fulcrum of this conflict rests the energy industry. No one enjoys polluting the air and waterways of our environment, but everyone enjoys light bulbs, air conditioning and automobiles.
Headline grabbing environmental disaster stories almost exclusively involve the energy industry. The parties named responsible in these cases are usually not considered criminals for valid reasons. They can usually plead ignorance or claim an honest mistake as the origin of the environmental disaster.
For example, the General Electric Co. dumped 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyl into the Hudson River throughout the middle of the 20th century. PCBs were widely used as industrial coolants and dielectric fluids in transformers. PCBs have also been shown to cause birth defects and cancer when consumed by humans.
When news of the harmful effects broke in the mid 1970s, PCBs were banned and GE stopped using them in their plant on the Hudson. Although GE legally dumped the chemicals in the river without knowledge of the environmental health consequences, the company has been involved in the effort to help clean up the river. Working with the Environmental Protection Agency, GE has committed to pay for this superfund site, a federal program instituted in 1980 to clean up the most dangerous hazardous waste sites in the U.S., with a price tag estimated at $750 million.
Probably the best-known environmental disaster is the Exxon Valdez oil spill that occurred in 1989. An over-worked and under-trained crew ran the oil tanker into a reef in the middle of the night. This resulted in 11 million gallons of crude oil being spilled along the pristine Alaskan coast. This natural disaster could not have been predicted and was certainly not planned by anyone.
The punitive damages that Exxon has to pay now total in the billions. Since then, great efforts have been taken by Exxon, as well as governmental regulatory bodies, to see that such disasters will not happen again.
Although companies such as GE and Exxon Mobil may not be eager to spend large sums of money on projects that have zero return on investment, we cannot fault them for being evil. As tragic as these disasters are, it can at least be said that the companies involved cared about their environmental impact, acknowledged their responsibility and are involved in the clean up efforts.
Unfortunately, not all companies in the energy industry will take this stance. Dominion Virginia Power, which produces most of the electricity for Virginia, is one of these companies. It hid 1.5 million tons of toxic coal fly ash under some turf near residential areas in Chesapeake, Va., and labeled it a golf course.
Fly ash is left over particles from parts of the coal that don’t burn in the furnace. It contains many heavy metals like lead, mercury and arsenic. These elements have been known to be toxic to humans for decades.
There are regulated and responsible ways of dealing with waste fly ash. It can be used as an ingredient in cement for construction projects, but is more commonly stored underground in lined landfills away from water supplies.
These landfills can be expensive and generally cannot be used for anything because they are full of toxic waste. If coal fly ash is not stored properly, then rainwater can leach heavy metals into the aquifer that is connected to the local water supply.
A version of this article appeared in the Feb 4 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 5 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
If you want less fly ash then start supporting clean coal research. This research has cover a large amount of ground in getting major reductions to fly ash causing contents of coal. The problem is that people on "your" side of the argument want to call it a myth and fund other projects like wind and solar. If you don't help clean coal, then you will be stuck with these kinds of problems until wind and solar can replace coal...which will not be for a good long time (20-30 years most likely)
Reply to this Top
This isn't even about clean coal or producing less fly ash. He simply wants companies to take responsibility and dispose of environmentally-hazardous wastes in a safe manner.
If coal companies in particular feel they can save money on coal ash disposal by investing in clean coal technology then they should by all means go for it.
Reply to this Top
I understand that but fly ash would be less of an environmental problem if people would stop supporting alternate energy (mostly).
The companies aren't responsible to fund research in Clean coal, we are.
Top
Good Article...I know a lot of the people affected by this, but I want to point out that there is nothing unsafe about playing at Battlefield Golf Course. It is a great facility that offers a $15 round during the week, $20 on weekends. It's hard to find golf at a reasonable price these days so Battlefield is a great place to go.
Reply to this Top
not so sure how the valdez oil spill was a natural disaster. the ship ran into some reef so it naturally spilled all the oil? but one more reason to not drink and drive as far as im concerned. but as long as that stuff is being dumped into the chesapeake thats fine, just keep it out of dc. we're used to lead, i dont think we can take another toxin
Reply to this Top