VT Black History Month about more than just skin color

Thursday, February, 4, 2010; 9:48 PM | 27 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: black history month

Negative assertions of race continue to oxygenate the sense of blackness as a single entity at the expense of a complicated diversity among blacks. This should not surprise us. The examples of whites acting together to exclude blacks have come from corporations and institutions invested in groupthink with a small and powerful coterie of whites at the helm. The moment the decision-making becomes democratic among whites is when racism loses out to innovation and talent, as the last election aptly demonstrated.

BHM should continue to showcase the creativity of the various ethnicities within the clumsy, catch-all category of race and it must continue to point the way toward cross-cultural exchanges between the races. The responsible BHM model (see the Africana Studies speaker series) must include raising awareness among college students of the many factors that continue to hold back blacks, even as those same students find themselves locked in a personal struggle to succeed and contribute creatively to the nation in global recession. 

The experiment of nation building is an unending one. BHM can continue to be a useful tool in raising awareness about the work that remains to be done for greater participation by the poor and disenfranchised in the largesse of the country.

I know race counts but it must stop being a negative marker of black being, it must be confined to aesthetics rather than rabid politics. I’ve had phone conversations with all manner of Americans who tell me that they did not realize I was black when I meet them because I did not sound black. How can such a stereotype (no matter how large a grain of truth to it) ever work to anyone’s advantage? This means that whether blacks like it or not they have been constructed in white consciousness in certain persistent unhealthy ways, rooted, no doubt, in a history of slavery. It is not simply a question of skin. Culture counts, but it is just part of the picture. Language denotes race to a certain extent but it includes class and location, education and religion, and, of course, power.

I’m interested in the extent to which blackness is performance in how far it is a mimetic identity and how far a matter of genealogy and being. That sounds heavy but is means that the humanity we hold in common must be foregrounded by all groups if race is to be less of a negative factor in the American psyche. Post-race may have nothing to do with blacks. Post-race may well mean that whites have to surrender the privilege and assumptions that come with white skin and enter a more neutral space of communality with other Americans.

Meanwhile let’s make Black History Month at Virginia Tech one step toward acknowledging one vital part of the American tapestry, devoting as we do most of the rest of the year to heralding the dominant group.

So what’s to celebrate? I think at the college level there is the usual mix of the arts and politics spread across concerts and panel discussions, but this BHM is extraordinary with the tragedy of Haiti. Perhaps it may call for a more international flavor to the month with a special look at our neighbor Haiti in need of a big helping hand.

Continue Reading:  « Previous12

A version of this article appeared in the Feb 5 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 27 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Steven Salaita | # February 4, 2010 @ 11:37 PM — Flag Comment

Fabulous, germane, and lyrical piece, Fred. A wonderful bit of education for the VT community. I will send around to my students, as they surely will find much of value in it.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 18, 2010 @ 3:48 AM — Flag Comment

This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 18, 2010 @ 3:51 AM — Flag Comment

This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)

Top


Anonymous | # February 5, 2010 @ 9:42 AM — Flag Comment

It's Black History month already dang year goes fast. You know what would be great this year is if we had an honest racial discussion. We could have a forum where we got together and talked about where we are coming from with our experiences and where you guys are coming from with yours. Sure you have liberals like John Driessnack that would be against that but say screw them. This year let's get together whites and blacks and put the cards on the table and find out where we have some common ground because if we keep sweeping this under the rug we'll never make progress reconciling.

Reply to this Top


hokie_1997 | # February 8, 2010 @ 8:13 AM — Flag Comment

If black history month is about more than skin color, then why is it called black history month? Why not call it what it really is -- white guilt month?


Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 8, 2010 @ 9:25 AM — Flag Comment

That's why I was saying we need an honest racial dialogue this year. White guilt can be just as bad as racism but if we bring this issue out into the open we can accomplish a lot with a constructive dialogue.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 9, 2010 @ 4:24 PM — Flag Comment

This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)

Top


???? | # February 9, 2010 @ 9:30 PM — Flag Comment

I'm guessing he meant Jesse Jackson?

Top


Anonymous | # February 12, 2010 @ 1:01 PM — Flag Comment

I think we can all agree that jesse james is a douche.

Top


hokie_1997 | # February 9, 2010 @ 7:56 AM — Flag Comment

Nice sentiment Anonymous, but I've found it's impossible to talk rationally about racial issues. How can you have begin to have a logical discussion when a black person can always fall back on "You owe us for slavery and Jim Crow"? Most white people will choose to avoid the issue altogether and just bide their time until February is over.

Reply to this Top


hokie_1997 | # February 9, 2010 @ 8:07 AM — Flag Comment

This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)

Reply to this Top


hokie_white_guy | # February 9, 2010 @ 6:16 PM — Flag Comment

It's because of folks like Al Sharpton and Jesse James that Americans can't discuss race issues objectively.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 9, 2010 @ 8:18 PM — Flag Comment

You are right about Al Sharpton he's a race baiting blowhard. Jesse James is a douche but I've never heard him speak on racial issues. If you let Al Sharpton keep you from speaking about racial issues then he's won. He doesn't want the races to reconcile because he makes his living on racism. We must speak on racial matters because of people like him and John Driessnack.

Reply to this Top


Black History Month - Lesson #1 | # February 16, 2010 @ 5:29 AM — Flag Comment

Jesse James: 19th century American outlaw or
motorcycle builder with TV show.

Jesse Jackson: American civil rights blowhard.

Reply to this Top


Major Variola (ret) | # February 12, 2010 @ 2:21 PM — Flag Comment

Read _The Bell Curve_

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 12, 2010 @ 2:46 PM — Flag Comment

That is a shill you all would be better served reading "I Hate Your Guts" by Jim Norton. The racial insights it contains are particularly insightful given that it is black history month. It's on sale now check it out at your local book retailer.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 14, 2010 @ 4:28 PM — Flag Comment

I find it hard to speak of equality among races as long as Black History Month exists. If black history is soo important and crucial, why not make bigger strides to get it emphasized year round and doing away with it all together.

It was created in a time in which it was needed and racism was far more prevalent than it is today.

Doing away with BHM would be a closer step towards equality.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 15, 2010 @ 10:59 PM — Flag Comment

I'm not going to deny that Black History Month isn't favoritism towards one race but it wouldn't be necessary if it was equally represented. The classrooms by and large teach white history with very little attention given to the contributions of minorities in history. Yeah they discuss slavery ad nausium but they don't show the positive contributions minorities have made to America. You can't tell me that if George Washington Carver was white he wouldn't get more attention than he does now.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 16, 2010 @ 3:13 PM — Flag Comment

Maybe that is a flaw of the education system and things need to change.

Black History Month was created during a time of incredible prejudice and racism. It was made in order to ensure that the history of a minority group was preserved and passed along in a society that did not care to focus on it at all.

As long as Black History Month exists, there will not be a lot of incentive for more integration of the material into a normal curriculum. It's easy to not incorporate the material when you are essentially giving recognition to a group for a single month.

It almost seems like the original idea createds to be a month to celebrate the accomplishments of a race has turned into a way to ignore them for 11 months out of the year.

Why should we spend a month celebrating all the accomplishments of a race? It promotes that separation. When we are studying about specific time periods, we need to learn about important contributions made by important figures, regardless of the color of their skin.

Top


Anonymous | # February 16, 2010 @ 5:12 PM — Flag Comment

A well written article. I think the diversity of the Black community should be better focused on; it would give light to the richness of a large and significant part of America.

Reply to this Top


J. Driessnack | # February 16, 2010 @ 5:14 PM — Flag Comment

I agree. Very well articulated. Too often is the Black community made to appear monolithic. I think a focus on the diversity would enlighten people to the significance of difference within a culture.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 16, 2010 @ 8:46 PM — Flag Comment

Please it's obvious that you are racist against minorities John Driessnack. Don't deny the truth when you look at you writings it becomes apparent that you hate minorities one needs only look at your racism article for proof.

Top


J. Driessnack | # February 17, 2010 @ 12:21 PM — Flag Comment

You are so frightened of me because I recognize a truth that you cannot stand to be true.

I pity you...and I know exactly what kind of a man you are.

Top


Anonymous | # February 17, 2010 @ 1:09 PM — Flag Comment

No you are jealous of me because I can be honest with minorities. You on the other arrogantly assume that you have to be the white savior of the simple Negroes that can't defend themselves against the big bad white man. You take a paternalistic tone with these groups because you think that they are inferior. You are scared to death that a black will see you for what you are an arrogant racist liberal.

Reply to this Top


Lee Hawkins | # February 18, 2010 @ 11:44 AM — Flag Comment

HAHA, i KNEW this would turn into an argument. Everyone is always so self-centered when it comes to discussions on race... step 1: get your heads out of your own ass!

Reply to this Top


J. Driessnack | # February 18, 2010 @ 1:04 PM — Flag Comment

I'm trying.

But I don't think people get self-centered when they discuss race. I think they become self-centered whenever privilege/oppression is the topic.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 18, 2010 @ 2:13 PM — Flag Comment

You are making progress dealing with your own inner demons. That's great news John, hopefully you can find peace with how you feel.

Top