Zhu sentenced to life in prison

Monday, April, 19, 2010; 12:15 PM | 25 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: haiyang zhu xin yang crime

Correction: This story has been modified from its original version. — This article has been modified from its original version. Daniel Murray has been corrected to Daniel Murrie. The Collegiate Times regrets this error.

A judge decided Monday that the Mr. Hyde inside former Virginia Tech graduate student Haiyang Zhu was too risky to ever be set free.

At a sentencing hearing Monday in Montgomery County Circuit Court, Judge Robert Turk saw two very different sides of Zhu, the 26-year-old former graduate student who killed graduate student Xin Yang in the café of the Graduate Life Center on Jan. 21, 2009.

Ultimately, Turk said the brutality of the murder — Zhu beheaded Yang a day after she ended his hopes of engaging in a romantic relationship — defied any rational explanation.

“I guess the rage you had to do that to someone — it just scares me,” Turk said.

In a hearing that lasted more than two hours, the court heard testimony from a psychologist who examined Zhu, as well as a friend of Zhu who shed light on the inner workings of the convicted killer who sat in the courtroom and stared straight ahead throughout the proceedings.

The prosecution presented testimony, heard through an interpreter, from the victim’s mother.

After sentencing Zhu to life in prison, the maximum term, Turk called Zhu’s case strange and atypical that reminded him of the story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Stephanie Cox, Zhu’s attorney, presented a new side to the man convicted of first-degree murder in December.

Daniel Murrie, director of psychology at the University of Virginia’s Institute of Law, Psychology and Public Policy, conducted multiple interviews with Zhu, as well as his family and friends, since Zhu was arrested the night of the murder.

While Murrie decided Zhu was competent to stand trial and legally sane, he said mental illness likely played a role in the crime.

Murrie said Zhu’s mother and grandmother had mental illnesses, most likely forms of schizophrenia.

While he said Zhu had likely dealt with depression throughout his life, a series of distressing factors pushed him over the edge after he came to Tech for the fall 2008 semester.

Murrie cited Zhu’s high level of academic achievement in China, then pointed out that his first semester at Tech was not successful in the Ph.D. agricultural economics program.

“He had left for America with high hopes and by the end of his first semester, he was on academic probation,” Murrie said. “Things were looking pretty bleak.”

After the fall 2008 semester, Zhu did not go home for break, but contacted his father wanting to leave school, and mentioned suicidal thoughts.

His family told him to stay in school and seek counseling.

“He was disappointed with his session,” Murrie said. “He may have misunderstood the idea of counseling. He said, ‘The counseling just listened and I went away feeling even worse.’”

However, Zhu was far from alone in his academic troubles. Five of the seven students in Tech’s agricultural economics doctoral program landed on academic probation following the semester.

But Zhu did not confront his academic troubles alone.

The court also heard testimony from Bob Needham, a Tech graduate student in the same program who befriended Zhu during the fall 2008 semester.

Needham knew Zhu as “Ocean,” which Zhu said is the translation of Haiyang.

He described Ocean as a “very courteous” guy who, “never spoke negatively about anything except the pressures of the program.

Needham and Zhu took their problems with the program to university administrators but did not make any headway. They later took a trip to the University of North Carolina-Charlotte to view a different program.

They became close enough that Needham invited Zhu to his December 2008 wedding.

“He got a big smile on his face,” Needham said. “He wanted a written invitation as a keepsake.”

The wedding transformed Zhu.

“He was having a great time,” Needham said. “He was very social, talking to whoever was there.”

At the reception, Zhu caught the garter, which Needham explained meant he would be the next male to marry.

Murrie said Zhu made reference to the wedding during their sessions.

“Maybe in too logical a way, he decided he was going to get married,” Murrie said.

Zhu first communicated with Yang shortly after the wedding on a social network site frequented by Chinese-Americans.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

Leave a comment 25 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Gary | # April 19, 2010 @ 12:33 PM — Flag Comment

How this guy doesn't get the death penalty is beyond me. It was clearly premeditated. Life in prison means the taxpayers have to shell out $40-50K a year to keep him locked up.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 19, 2010 @ 1:47 PM — Flag Comment

Studies show that it costs more to put someone to death than it does to keep them in prison for life.

As for the pro-death penalty folks in here, if it's wrong for people to kill each other (and I think we agree it is) then it is also wrong for the state to kill people. Revenge != justice.

Reply to this Top


Jana | # April 19, 2010 @ 2:57 PM — Flag Comment

In reference to my comment below, I didn't mean to come across as a pro death penalty person, though I can see how my comments look that way. I'm actually pretty conflicted on the issue. I was just noting that it seems like if the state is going to allow the death penalty for some offenses, this should be one. However, I certainly don't think I'd be opposed to seeing the death penalty abolished altogether for the reasons you state Anonymous.

Top


Fred | # April 19, 2010 @ 4:44 PM — Flag Comment

Wrong my friend, the anti death penalty crowd likes to claim that the death penalty is far more expensive, but they lowball estimate the cost of incarceration, especially as it pertains to high security incarceration early and prison geriatric care later. Their model also assumes that the inmate will not make use of the legal system to appeal.

The death penalty has a higher initial cost due to the added precautions and legal undertakings during trial, but it balances out favorably in the long run versus life imprisonment, especially in Virginia where an inmate is executed within about five to six years of conviction.

Also the power of the state to execute convicted murderers is not an extraordinary power of the state. After all, imprisonment is not kidnapping, taxation is not theft.

Top


Anonymous | # April 19, 2010 @ 5:47 PM — Flag Comment

How is it more expensive to kill someone than to keep them alive for 40 years??
If the death penalty was frequently enforced, criminals would be far less likely to commit crimes that warrant the death penalty... fact or fiction?

Top


Andy | # April 20, 2010 @ 8:33 AM — Flag Comment

Well as far as I am concerned, in cases like this where there were many witnesses and it can easily be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the guilty party committed the murder, then he should go straight to the chair with no appeals. That would drastically reduce the costs of administering the death penalty. It seems like the high costs generally associated with the death penalty come from the endless appeals granted to the criminal.

Top


anonymous | # April 21, 2010 @ 4:34 PM — Flag Comment

an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind

Top


Andy | # April 22, 2010 @ 8:17 AM — Flag Comment

No it doesn't. I have never shot anyone, never stabbed anyone, never beat anyone up. Have you?

Top


Brad | # May 4, 2010 @ 4:46 PM — Flag Comment

The death penalty is on the table to act as a deterrent to would-be murderers. 99% of people usually value their own life, even if they do not value the lives of others. The idea of sitting in prison for 40 years with free room/board and meals courtesy of the working class doesn't sound too bad to some of the real nut jobs out there. I personally wouldn't want to be the guy that flips the kill switch on someone, but if a state sponsored execution can deter x amount of murders from occurring in the first place AND save the tax payer millions of dollars what's not to love?

Top


Fred | # April 19, 2010 @ 4:38 PM — Flag Comment

It was a charge of first degree murder, which is punishable by a maximum of life imprisonment without parole rather than capital murder, which can be punished by death.

This case didn't have the aggravating factors (such as robbery, rape or abduction of the victim, two or more victims or a law enforcement officer killed in line of duty, to name a few) specified under Virginia law for capital murder. In contrast, William Morva murdered a sheriffs deputy, murdered while escaping custody and murdered two people in a three year period, thus he was eligible for the death sentence on four counts.

Cho would have been eligible under the 2x killings factor, but wisely he chose to execute himself. I can't imagine what a headache of a trial that would have been.

Reply to this Top


OK | # April 19, 2010 @ 7:04 PM — Flag Comment

I know!
We should force him to live with Sarah Palin for 40 years - that would REALLY kill him.
That screechy voice, spinning nut-job eyes, non-stop jibberish she spews, the ability
to manipulate any living thing to within a fraction of logic or rational judgement. It's the
BEST insane asylum in the nation! Maybe he'd even try again.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 19, 2010 @ 7:26 PM — Flag Comment

It costs the tax pagers more for him to be on death row

Reply to this Top


anonymous. | # April 21, 2010 @ 2:33 AM — Flag Comment

I agree with the 'straight to the chair' mentality, but I'm hoping he'll suffer more left to rot in prison for the rest of his days.

Reply to this Top


Jana | # April 19, 2010 @ 12:54 PM — Flag Comment

Gary, It's crazy how Virginia law works. The highest penalty for first degree murder is life in prison. Prosecutors can only charge someone with capital murder, which allows the death penalty, if there is another offense along with the murder (i.e. robbery, rape, murder for hire). Someone can also be charged with capital murder if he/she kills a police officer, a judge, a witness who has been subpoenaed or a pregnant woman. It's all outlined here: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000 coh 18.2-31 702958 I agree with you though that murder in general should always bring the death penalty into the picture, especially when the act is this violent.

Reply to this Top


Adding | # April 19, 2010 @ 1:01 PM — Flag Comment

Also, when a party takes a plea deal, the death penalty is generally off of the table as a result of the state not having to spend money on the trial. I agree that he deserves the death penalty but things in the law don't always work out for the most justice.

Reply to this Top


Fred | # April 19, 2010 @ 4:53 PM — Flag Comment

The death penalty was never on the table due to the absence of aggravating factors listed earlier in the replies here. It was simply a question of whether he wanted to go thru a trial or not.

Top


Anonymous | # April 22, 2010 @ 9:21 AM — Flag Comment

Fred I understand that it was never on the table, that is why I said ALSO. As in even if it had been on the table. I understand the law in Virginia as I am currently a law student. I was simply trying to say that even if this was a case where the law allowed for capital punishment, it would not have occurred.

Top


Fred | # April 22, 2010 @ 3:20 PM — Flag Comment

Having followed developments with the death penalty in VA, I can say that this crime, as graphic as the wounds were to the victim, likely would not have been pursued for a death sentence if an aggravating factor had been present. Unlike Morva, Zhu didn't demonstrate a willingness to kill victims on the spur of the moment. Nor did he invoke a "you should fear me because I am willing to kill again" attitude.

Someone like Morva or Ben Lilly (who carjacked and murdered Tech student Alexander Defillipis in 1995 from Hethwood) committed crimes that deserved (and received) the death penalty. Zhu getting life imprisonment is a reasonable sentence. If Zhu found adjusting to Virginia Tech hard, he's going to discover Sussex II is not a picnic. But then again, maybe it beats living in rural China.

Top


Anonymous | # April 19, 2010 @ 4:10 PM — Flag Comment

This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 19, 2010 @ 6:32 PM — Flag Comment

Very poorly written article...

Reply to this Top


Reality Check | # April 19, 2010 @ 7:00 PM — Flag Comment

And the convicted is smiling blankly, because he's seeing
little dancing neon children's toys...not the reality of his future.
Sad in every way imaginable.

Reply to this Top


Ghost Rider | # April 20, 2010 @ 1:57 PM — Flag Comment

Don't care what his family history was, what kind of pressure was on him or how sad (*sniff, sniff) he was. There is NO excuse for this under any circumstances. This was not a heat of the moment, crime-of-passion mistake. This was a very public, very brutal, ritual murder that terrorized a community that was already hurting - not to mention robbing an innocent girl of her life. He got what he deserves - to rot in a cell for the rest of his life and to rot in hell thereafter.

Reply to this Top


Mrs. Scott | # May 1, 2010 @ 3:02 AM — Flag Comment

I agree on your comment, rotting is what he needs so he can understand what he did was wrong.........

Reply to this Top


Mrs. Scott | # May 1, 2010 @ 2:59 AM — Flag Comment

First off, in the bible it states thou shall not kill, and second two wrongs do not make a right!!!!

Killing Zhu is not going to make him pay for anything because he would be dead, and that is what he wants, now making him sit there and think about what he did will make him pay. I know its wrong to kill someone and I am deeply sadden by what happen because NO ONE deserves to die, but thats not up to us as Americans to handle that is up to God, he has to face God in the end and so do we, so why does it matter how much money were all paying, were not going to be here that long.......tomorrow is not promised to none of us!!!! I lost my father and he was killed by a drunk driver, now when I was younger I hated that man who killed my father because he changed my whole life, but I cant hate him because of his stupidity, I have to let God handle him in the end!!!!

R.I.P Xin Yang YOUR WILL BE FOREVER MISSED!!!!

Reply to this Top


Needham | # March 9, 2011 @ 5:49 PM — Flag Comment

Romans 3:19-26
God bless!

Reply to this Top