Q&A: Veteran advocates for gays in military

Tuesday, April, 27, 2010; 9:34 PM | 9 | | Print

Students walk past 800 American Flags representing the 800 military personel with mission-critical skills discharged under Don't Ask Don't Tell on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 as a part of of the Human Right's Campaign's effort to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell.

Share


TOPICS: military corps of cadets lgbta

Former United States army service member and Christiansburg resident Cindy Mitchell will be in Blacksburg today to speak out against the U.S. military’s sexuality policy of “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Serving for two years, Mitchell rose to the rank of private first class, and left the service under an honorable discharge. Mitchell’s husband still serves as a member of the U.S. Army Reserve.

Mitchell will be one of three featured speakers for the Blacksburg leg of the “Voices of Honor: A Generation Under ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’” tour. The nationwide tour, put on by the Human Rights Campaign in conjunction with Servicemembers United, will look to rally support to end the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

The policy, enacted in 1993, allows for gay soldiers to serve provided they do not engage in “homosexual conduct.” As a part of the policy, individuals joining the armed forces would not be asked about their sexuality.

Mitchell spoke with the Collegiate Times on Tuesday about her time in uniform, gays in the military, and her own upbringing in Georgia.

COLLEGIATE TIMES: Why are you coming out against “Don’t ask, don’t tell?” What makes this an issue you care about?

MITCHELL: When I served, there were many homosexual people that are in the military, that I’m very close friends with, that I worked with everyday.

I didn’t think it was right for somebody to tell you that because of your sexual preference you can’t serve your country.

If they’re willing to sacrifice their time and their life for their country, it shouldn’t matter what their sexual preference is.

CT: About how many homosexuals would you say you worked with? Was this really widespread?

Mitchell: Oh yes, definitely. In basic training, just out of the about 25 females that went through, about eight or nine were homosexual.

When I got to my actual duty station, one of my (Non-Commissioned Officers) was homosexual.

A lot of the military police I was friends with were homosexual, and I never had a problem with them whatsoever.

CT: Was it surprising to see this high of a number?

MITCHELL: Yes and no. When you enlist, they tell you as a recruit you cannot be a homosexual, but they cannot force you to tell. It’s something to keep under the covers.

Basically, they can threaten you with discharge if you come out and say you are homosexual.

CT: Do you feel you were breaking the rules by not reporting your fellow officers?

MITCHELL: No. Not at all. Everybody knew, nobody said anything.

CT: One of the issues that have come up in the discussion about “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is the impact on unit morale. What are some of your thoughts on this aspect of the debate?

MITCHELL: I don’t think it hurts morale at all. As long as they got in there and did their job, they were all a part of the team and got the mission completed. It never affected morale at all. It’s a job. We were paid to do our job, and when we were at work we did our job. That was it.

CT: Was the productivity of any of your homosexual service members an issue?

MITCHELL: Not at all. When they came to work, they were at work. All personal lives, even those of heterosexual people, were left at the door when they came in.

CT: What impact do you see if the government changed its mind on “Don’t ask, don’t tell?” What do you think would happen?

MITCHELL: I think for individuals it would boost morale, because people could be true to themselves, and not try to hide behind a shield. They would feel more comfortable at work.

For the military as a whole, we all fight for one thing, for freedom. Who are we to tell somebody because of their sexual preference that they can’t fight for their country? When there are numerous heterosexual people, it would do nothing but boost the whole morale of not only individuals but also the military as a whole.

A version of this article appeared in the Apr 28 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 9 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Ted- US Army 1st Armored Division Vet | # April 27, 2010 @ 11:28 PM — Flag Comment

Mrs. Mitchell's comments show a studied disregard of military and world history. Her observations are disfunctional and demonstrate a clear lack of moral courage. Her lack of knowledge or familiarity in combat arms further exacerbates the futility of her observations and opinions. I guess you were running short of things to print. Perhaps Mrs. Mitchell's time would be better spent reading and studying military and world history than talking about something that her comments demonstrate- she knows nothing of any substance.

Reply to this Top


jeffiem | # April 28, 2010 @ 10:36 AM — Flag Comment

Thank your for your detailed list of demonstrable facts proving that allowing openly gay members to serve would be bad for anything.

...wait a second ... you didn't say anything! Sorry about that.

Mrs. Mitchell does demonstrate knowledge and familiarity, in that she was there. Have faith in your service members to be respectful professionals. Deal with real issues, not what some may perceive as a potential issue, a perception rooted in bigotry and fear. Our service members deserve to be honest to themselves and others. The fact that every other developed country does this and maintains a functional military should be a sign that DADT can be abolished wth no major adverse effects.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # May 5, 2010 @ 7:04 PM — Flag Comment

Actually that argument you made is rather ad hominem and since morality is not absolute your contention only applies under certain assumptions which may or may not be wrong. Further, one does not require a knowledge of military combat or technique to know that it is like any other group dynamic - only intensified with life and death scenarios. What you neglect is the factor paranoia plays among heterosexuals regarding their homosexual partners. If homophobic heterosexual soldiers were not paranoid there would be no issue concerning group cohesion. Non-homophobic hetero-soldiers do not seem to have a problem; such as my father (air force Lt. Col) and sister (marine).

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # April 28, 2010 @ 11:52 AM — Flag Comment

I also served in the Army for 5 years in a Combat Arms unit (Infantry) and did a year long deployment in Afghanistan and 15 months in Iraq, so I think that qualifies me to say that there were a large number of homosexual males and females in my battalion and we all knew who they were and they never hit on me or made me uncomfortable. What they did do is go on patrols, convoys and other missions with me and watch my back. When bullets are flying and IED's exploding at your vehicle the last thing you care about is who your battle buddy is dating. So to all that think homosexuals can't serve in the military, just remember that once Americans thought that women shouldn't be able to vote and blacks shouldn't be free. Quit being ignorant and realize that sexual preference doesn't define you as a person or a soldier only your actions do.

Reply to this Top


Border patrol | # April 28, 2010 @ 12:32 PM — Flag Comment

I'd rather be a women than a weak man.

Reply to this Top


Border | # April 28, 2010 @ 12:37 PM — Flag Comment

This comment has been buried by moderation (show comment)

Reply to this Top


~MilitarySista~ | # April 28, 2010 @ 10:14 PM — Flag Comment

You would rather be a WOMEN? Don't you mean a WOMAN? Hehe :) But seriously... I agree with Border Patrol. When bullets are flying, it doesn't matter if you're dating a Jan or a Joe, I just want you watching my brother's back! And Jeffiem, have a little respect! She served her country and is actually speaking about the subject at hand! This wasn't supposed to be a history lesson! Alright, I'll get off my soap box now :) Love you brother Isaac! Stay safe!

Reply to this Top


zephyr hats | # January 18, 2013 @ 6:24 PM — Flag Comment

Great blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol
zephyr hats http://www.trade-fromchina.com/Zephyr-snapback-hats-c2036.html

Reply to this Top


sac longchamp pas cher | # April 24, 2013 @ 2:21 AM — Flag Comment

The stars of your pool are definitely the comments plus the pictures will be secondary. Don¡ät contain photos using only congrats as well as praise. sac longchamp pas cher http://www.saclongchampsoldes2013

Reply to this Top