BHS not beyond repair

Tuesday, September, 14, 2010; 10:56 PM | 8 | | Print

bhs_center

Share


TOPICS: blacksburg high school

The Montgomery County Board of Supervisors closed a chapter of Blacksburg High School’s ongoing saga Monday night when it voted to repair the damaged school.

The board of supervisors voted 5-2 against a plan to build a new BHS, a project that could have potentially cost the county $124.5 million, in favor of repairing the current building at an estimated cost of $14.5 million.

Although the issue has been under discussion by both the board of supervisors and the Montgomery County School Board since the BHS gymnasium collapsed on Feb. 13, Monday night’s vote came unexpectedly.

The vote was not on the agenda for Monday night’s meeting.

Supervisor Mary Biggs, who represents western and northwestern portions of the town of Blacksburg, said supervisor Gary Creed brought up the vote during the section of the agenda designated for member business at the end of Monday’s meeting.

“I’m concerned because the vote was taken without knowing the true total cost,” Biggs said. “We had not explored all the information on building new facilities.”

Biggs cast one of the two “no” votes. The other was cast by board of supervisors chairwoman Annette Perkins.

“I think it’s a fairness issue,” Biggs said. “I think it should be something that was open to the public and media.”

Blacksburg Town Council member and Virginia Tech math professor Susan Anderson said although the town council does not have an official position or role in the question of repairing the building, she felt the vote should have been listed on the board’s agenda.

“Many people who would have wanted to be present didn’t know to come,” Anderson said. “It seems that our residents want to share their views.”

Though the vote came unexpectedly, many supervisors had already expressed wishes to repair BHS instead of constructing a new school.

“The timing was surprising, the outcome was not,” said Wat Hopkins, a school board member and Tech communication professor. “The vote last night was inevitable. It was going to happen.”

Creed, who represents the southeastern portion of Montgomery County, said he made his decision to push the vote after touring the building last week.

“They told us everything that needed to be done,” Creed said. “They told us all of it was fixable and doable.”

Though Hopkins acknowledged Creed’s point of view, he said he was not sure why the vote was made at the end of Monday’s night meeting without being scheduled on the agenda, calling the move “trickery.”

Biggs said she was “looking forward to talking with the engineers again” during a second joint meeting between the school board and the board of supervisors that is scheduled for Sept. 23. She did not know if that meeting would still be held.

Since February, engineers have been inspecting the building for structural deficiencies. Steel beams that support the building’s roof have been tested for quality. In an Aug. 30 joint meeting between the board of supervisors and the school board, school board member Walt Shannon said 54 percent of the steel beams failed the tests.

Members of both boards have been split on what the better solution for the schools would be.

School board chairman Wendell Jones said during the Aug. 30 joint meeting he did not support repairing the current building.

“I will not vote to put anybody back in that facility if the gym is not complete,” Jones said during the meeting. “Someone would really have to convince me that that basement (gym) is safe. I don’t believe it is.”

However, building a new school would have meant a tax increase across the county of 10 to 12 cents per $100 on property taxes.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

A version of this article appeared in the Sep 15 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 8 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Anonymous | # September 15, 2010 @ 7:59 AM — Flag Comment

The roof has already collapsed twice and more than 40% of the structural beams tested did not meet code in 1969, according to the Roanoke Times. In addition, they were soon going to build a new HS anyway. The Montgomery County School Board is making a stupid decision and putting every member of our community who will be in that school later in danger. Shame on all of them.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 15, 2010 @ 8:00 AM — Flag Comment

Sorry, that should have said Mont. Co Board of Supervisors.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 15, 2010 @ 10:13 AM — Flag Comment

If the building is fully investigated and then repaired how will anyone be in danger?

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 15, 2010 @ 9:43 AM — Flag Comment

Is the Board of Supervisors not a public body that is required to give advance notice of agenda items before voting on them? Any time an important matter is handled with sneaky secrecy, it is suspect. Their actions should be investigated.

Reply to this Top


Zachary Barnes | # September 15, 2010 @ 10:31 AM — Flag Comment

Well, even if they fully repair it, the 14million dollar price tag is repairing the school "as its been reviewed"... unfortunately they have only tested about 30% of the columns and 100% are required to be tested so I have a feeling that the price tag is gonna jump soon... Not to mention they're planning on building a new school in 10 years anyways. So, yes, after spending an inordinate amount on repairing a crumbling building it will be safe... but it will be a giant money pit.

Reply to this Top


hokie | # September 16, 2010 @ 9:09 AM — Flag Comment

well, this is how misinformation spreads....
The cost of repairs is more like $3-$5 million other $9-$10 million is for rebuilding a new gym, which is covered by insurance. It is sneaky how the public officials never mention the true cost.

This decision in February of this year could have avoided all the drama and expense of moving three schools (BHS, BMS and old CMS). I urge the reporters to dig deeper into the story of how fight between county and insurance companies cost the county 2-3 million and pain for students.

Reply to this Top


Jenn B | # September 15, 2010 @ 5:56 PM — Flag Comment

LIana, I want to commend you on writing a thorough article. I first read about this from the Roanoke Times, and not once did that reporter mention why BHS needed repairs (and that story was written by two reporters no less). I'm not familiar with the story, so I didn't understand the significance of this vote. After reading your story, I was able to see the big picture. Thanks for writing a well-rounded article. As a CT alum, I'm proud to see that we're still better than the Roanoke Times.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # September 19, 2010 @ 10:57 PM — Flag Comment

There is no guarantee of the insurance money, which now is being figured to be about $3.5 million dollars for the gym rebuild--MUCH less that originally requested. Something else that needs to be done BEFORE anything starts on the rebuilding of BHS is: as recommended in a study done by ATS International in Christiansburg--"additional borings be conducted with air-rotary, coring, or other methods capable of penetrating rock...the borings be advanced to approximately 50 feet in order to penetrate the rock and determine if the underlying low-resistivity features contain void space or raveled soils."

Reply to this Top