Affirmative action programs designed to help minority students have been the subject of much debate over the years. There has been much litigation brought before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of affirmative action being applied to college admissions.
I find it odd a social policy attempting to promote equal opportunity and counter the effects of historical discrimination can be an issue of such great contention. Yet despite all the attention affirmative action receives, there is something else being taken into consideration when most universities are going through their admission processes.
I am talking about the preferences universities show toward applicants of alumni, more commonly referred to as “legacy children.” To me this is a horrible form of discrimination, as it is a discrete way of countering affirmative action. It ultimately disadvantages minorities and first-generation college-bound students, as it favors white and wealthy Americans.
Affirmative action tries to bring equality into actuality and not just in theory. Legacy preferences, on the other hand, advantage the already advantaged, and are in no way based on the merits of the applicants but only on their lineage. Legacy preferences are not trying to right a wrong of history. Instead it is solely for the purpose of raising money and keeping the donations coming.
This issue doesn’t get the attention and litigation it truly deserves, but hopefully the Supreme Court will one day consider it a form of illegal discrimination.
To show you how serious of an issue this is, it has been determined as many as three-quarters of the universities in this country apply legacy preferences to their admission processes. We even see it employed here at Virginia Tech. Recall how there was even a section on your application where it asked if you have any family members that are alumni. Did you know 26 percent of this year’s freshman class are legacy children?
That means they had a grandparent, parent or sibling go here. I bet there are many of us who even know someone denied admission here, and at the same time someone else accepted over them, who had lower SAT scores and GPA. There is a chance it could be because of legacy preferences. Did you also know a study has shown being the child of an alumnus increases your chance of acceptance by 20 percent?
It is not an easy thing to prove universities are doing this to such an overwhelming extent. When researchers try to study this, many universities are too embarrassed to admit how much being a legacy factors into admissions.
Yeah, universities might flaunt their acceptance rates of only 10 percent, but what they won’t tell you are their acceptance rates for legacy children are around 40 percent. Our nation has never been one to always apply the law equally to all. We can all agree we have come a long way in the last two centuries, but there is still work to be done.
The Fourteenth Amendment says everyone shall receive equal protection under the law. We need to embody this idea; no child should be discriminated against because of who their parents were.
People who criticize affirmative action contend this is exactly what it does. But to only see the world in that light is to not value a principle that addresses the horrible realization of an atrocious history of discrimination. With legacy preferences, there is no justification for the discrimination based on lineage.
Some states have banned affirmative action policies that help minorities. If there is justification for this, then how can states still justify allowing legacy preferences? We all should agree discrimination based on race, gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation are not warranted. So why do we continue to allow 75 percent of universities to discriminate against children whose parents didn’t have the opportunity or resources to attend college?
If you feel yourself or someone you know has been the subject of “legacy preference discrimination,” don’t be afraid to take a stand against this. Give the American Civil Liberties Union a call; I’m sure it would love to turn this into litigation. It would be a good way of getting this settled by our courts and bring this contentious issue to justice.
We must never stop fighting to make the equal protection of our laws a reality for all Americans. This may be only one of many problems in our country, but it is a great place to start.
There are too many policies in this country favoring people in the upper classes of society. This horrible policy discriminating on socioeconomic grounds is one that must be attacked.
A version of this article appeared in the Oct 21 issue of the Collegiate Times.
Leave a comment 22 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
Affirmative action is just as bad. Just because you're black doesn't mean you've had a disadvantaged life. There are plenty of white people (as well as other races) who have had a more disadvantaged life (see: my girlfriend and EVERYONE in her town, both black AND white). The only thing that decides anything is CLASS (all of the aforementioned being poor and living in a poor area). Being black doesn't mean squat if your dad's a lawyer and the white girl next door lives in the slums.
Affirmative action IS racist. "Legacy children" at least makes sense from a university-standpoint, since it usually means at least one parent graduated from the university and (likely) supports it both socially and financially. Letting a minority in simply for the sake of diversity achieves nothing other than altering the ratio of minorities to non-minorities. Which doesn't do anything.
Reply to this Top
When I applied to college I was a legacy to Lehigh and I was competing with a black male who was my age with a lower GPA. I did all the same sports as him and even had a few more extracurriculars. He got into Legigh and I didn't, so don't complain about legacy. The kid that I was competing with also had a father who was a doctor and better off than me.
Reply to this Top
Actually, part of the premise behind affirmative action is that being black does mean you're disadvantaged in life, at least relative to being white. I happen to agree with this assertion.
The progeny of a group so inhumanely targeted for slavery and extermination for hundreds of years should be given an uplifted chance to succeed. In the 1960s, the overwhelming majority of blacks were poor. Decades later not much has changed--blacks are still disproportionately poor. Likewise, whites still hold a significant lead in just about every indicator of communal success. Sure, progress has been realized, but only marginally. Middle class and rich blacks have emerged, but even these groups teeter and tooter.
If America owes its black citizens anything, it is more than a slim chance of success. We owe them much more than a "Sorry" note. We should make it our duty and obligation to do the best we can to engender black succses, even if that means some of us make sacrifices to do it.
Reply to this Top
I agree with you. If it was this generation that caused black people's suffering. It wasn't. It was likely nobody related to me (my having immigrant grandparents makes it unlikely that my ancestors were involved in slavery in the US). So why should I be disadvantaged to make up for what someone I don't know and don't care about did to somebody else hundreds of years ago?
Oh, and guess what, we exploited the hell out of the Chinese building our railroads. And now they own us lol.
My question to you is do we owe black people monetary reparations? You say they're disadvantaged and it's a fault of white America. So should every white person in America be forced to pay reparations to every black person?
Top
We already do pay all the black people in America our reparations, it is called welfare.
Top
I agree with you.
I am really tired of listening to white middle class people complain about how hard it is for them to not be accepted to college over a black person, as though such a thing was impossible.
These people, with their anecdotal evidence, act as though their personal experience is proof that white people are slighted by affirmative action. My God...what don't you people realize about the fact that discrimination and its effects do not disappear in 1, 2, or even 3 generations?
Top
J.D., look at the paper on UVA's acceptance standards between black and white students. Other colleges do the same as well (W&M and another university were also in the paper, I think).
And I agree that discrimination and its effects don't disappear immediately. However, I disagree with you that more racism is the best way to combat it. If nothing else, I would feel terrible if I knew the only reason a college accepted me was because of my skin color, and not my credentials. Talk about feeling like none of your achievements matter...
Top
Pay, you are what is wrong with humanity. Grow up. Seriously, that was completely unwarranted and wrong. And, of course you won't put your actual name on the collegiate times when making a comment like that.....
Top
Great job Mr. Carroll, personal attacks are very grown up. I see you take my comment as something racist, when it is more of a classist comment. The majority of people who demand reparations are not the rich black people, it is the poor who want the money more than anything else. I have had a few black friends who would joke about me owing them it whenever they forgot their lunch money, some were strait from Africa and theoretically never had their relatives here to demand reparations. They only asked for it when they wanted money and that is what the people who demand it today want. Black or otherwise, the people who need the money are getting it through welfare/ our reparations. The black people who are calling for reparations are generally in the group that would be on welfare and I am sure if the white people in that group could call for reparations, they would too. But thank you Mr. Carroll for assuming I am raciest and therefore "what is wrong with humanity", I can probably guarantee that I have more close black and Hispanic friends than you will ever have.
Top
There you go again. Go back and read the first comment. If the point is to try to help underprivileged people, and a disproportionate number of them happen to be black, that's fine, but to say "well, lots of black people are poor, so we'll make affirmative action to give all black people a better chance" is about the most degrading thing you can say to any black person who does not fit that stereotype. I did not own slaves. I do not discriminate against black people. I feel no moral obligation to pay reparations to black people. I do feel charitable though and regularly donate to organizations that seek to help all poor people, because that's the group who needs help.
Top
just walk away, there's nothing that can be accomplished here, just walk away, the author's opinion in no way will affect you, just walk away,
Reply to this Top
just walk away, there's nothing that can be accomplished here, just walk away, the author's opinion in no way will affect you, just walk away,
Reply to this Top
just walk away, there's nothing that can be accomplished here, just walk away, the author's opinion in no way will affect you, just walk away,
Reply to this Top
Affirmative action can be likened to putting out fire with a flamethrower...
Reply to this Top
Affirmative action, once useful, has outlived it's usefulness. It has become a type of reverse discrimination and is holding our country back.
Reply to this Top
welfare? Seriously? So every black person in America is on Welfare?
Reply to this Top
All the ones that "need" it, yes.
Top
I fail to see how a policy that intentional singles out students based solely on their race is combating racism. A truly colorblind society wouldn't care what the race of the applicant was. Let's judge people by the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin.
Reply to this Top
It is quite possible that the universities that are factoring in "Legacy" are doing it for another reason. Children of parents who have graduated from their university are more likely to succeed. They want to admit students who will successfully complete the program.
Reply to this Top
You couldn't be more off base. Ever read a college application? Because most of them include sections asking you if you are a "minority" or "first generation college student" that you say are the ones being discriminated AGAINST. Enormous amounts of unqualified minorities are accepted to institutions across the country.
It's not racism, it's reality. Sure, some rich white kids are getting into mommy and daddies Alma Maters, but guess what? It's because mommy and daddy take it to the bank erry weekend because they are successful in life. God forbid a school accept their children (who probably aren't dumb, just might not be as qualified) because their parents donate money. Here's another reality check for you... the money that mommy and daddy donate are going STRAIGHT TO scholarships for your underprivileged students that you seem to think are being victims of witch hunts. When in fact these kids are given MORE than enough opportunities to succeed.
The real question here is, what school shot you down?
Reply to this Top
Fantastic stuff, these are the article types that pave the way for budding bloggers. A great starter kit for times of writers block too.Nice resource Kim!
http://www.afreshkicks.com/
Reply to this Top
Le SD est insérée dans la carte de stockage interne pour fournir. le portugais Opération facile de l’interface Fenêtre d’aide intelligente à temps Dernière ?Mooshell 2. un des wagons Peu qui permet aux utilisateurs de Flash pour mettre à niveau la base du firmware, Carte r4i-SDHC 3DS Ladapteur r4i pour?Nintendo DSi / DSi est la dernière technique de flash mémoire pour Nintendo DSi , DSTTi a numéro de série unique du matériel VID . <a href="http://www.r43ds.info/" title="r4 3ds">r4 3ds</a>
Reply to this Top