Distracted driving needs reprimand

Friday, November, 5, 2010; 9:51 AM | 10 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: transportation technology

Say hello to the new wave of distracted driving, the latest member of a dangerous family of road hazards: driving while texting.

Sounds as serious as a DUI. This branch of distracted driving is dominating the news.

DWT is considered at least a secondary offense in most states; it is a primary offense in some. A primary offense is a violation that warrants being pulled over. Secondary offenses get tacked onto primary offenses but are not reasons for police to stop violators.

Authorities are cracking down on DWT, and decision-makers are writing legislation imposing harsher sanctions. In some cases, the terms “DWT” and “distracted driving” are used interchangeably.

We’ve all seen out-of-control DWT drivers. However, that doesn’t mean it is the only and most dangerous form. People have radios or iPods hooked up, along with a GPS above the dash, vanity mirrors in the sun visors, TVs in the back, pet passengers, cigarettes, maps, newspapers, and food and drink.

Some haphazard drivers try to shave, apply makeup in the car or eat a plate of food with a knife and fork.

Distracted driving includes a whole spectrum of behaviors. Don’t let the issue du jour make you forget there are still many other distractions in the car.

Our own Virginia Tech Transportation Institute reports 80 percent of all crashes and 65 percent of near-crashes result from driver inattention within three seconds of the crash.

Three seconds!

We’ve all done it: torn our eyes away from the road to skip a song on an iPod, change the radio station or fish for that elusive pack of cigarettes or gum. It’s harmless, right? What could happen?

Do the math: You’re going 35 mph and you glance away for those crucial three seconds. You’ve just traveled 159 feet — more than half a football field — without even watching the road. And that’s at only 35 mph. Think about the wreckage a distracted driver could cause going 50 mph or more. 

Think about the manslaughter charges, the insurance claims, the guilt, just from fishing for a lost item under the seat for three seconds.

Distracted driving caused 5,500 deaths and half a million injuries in 2009, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. There are still more than 200 million drivers out there, many of whom may be dedicating their hands and attention to other pursuits in the car and not the most important task in front of them.

A University of Utah study discovered distracted driving resulted in a driver as bad as, or even worse than, a drunk driver. We don’t want to drive drunk, do we? Why should we
be any less forgiving of distracted drivers?

The Highway Loss Data Institute conducted a study comparing collision insurance claims before and after DWT legislation and found there were more accidents after the
fact. 

The problem has become more acute because people not only refuse to obey the law but have become even more distracted by their attempts to evade it. These laws also narrowly focus on texting, excluding from focus all other equally distracting activities.

Texting is not the only distraction in the car.

Keep the cell phone tucked away, your iPod on a playlist, your GPS pre-routed with the voice guidance on and your eyes on the road. Consider what the police will say when they pull you over: “Keep your hands where I can see them — on
the wheel.”

Do it now before a police officer commands you or before you’re distracted driving turns your life and the lives of others into a twisted wreck.

A version of this article appeared in the Nov 5 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 10 Comments Write a letter to the editor

M. | # November 6, 2010 @ 5:38 PM — Flag Comment

The statistics are that texting OR talking on the phone while driving is actually deadlier that DUI/DWI. Ask an actuary.

The difference is almost all cell phones nowadays have a GPS chip in them. That means the fact that whether you are moving and at what rate are accessible by police (without a warrant, too!). Simple solution: lock up anybody found to be phoning and driving if they cause an accident. Mail them a ticket or pull 'em over if the phone's speed is above a certain rate. Passengers can deal with it.

Reply to this Top


Alum | # November 7, 2010 @ 10:22 AM — Flag Comment

These laws are getting ridiculous. Another tax against the people, another excuse to get pulled over by the cops. I still text and drive and read emails and drive it's a big part of my job when I'm away from the office. I realize the consequences but that's my decision to make. I know it's not safe but neither is driving the speed limit in the left lane, pissing people off and creating accidents.


Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # November 7, 2010 @ 12:23 PM — Flag Comment

That's just stupid. Driving while texting and reading emails is just as bad as driving while drunk. You're not paying full attention to your surroundings. It may be your choice, but your choice can affect the lives of others.

Top


M. | # November 7, 2010 @ 1:00 PM — Flag Comment

It's also peoples decision to drive drunk. You still have to face the consequences of negligent actions. Who do you work for, a defense law firm? Self-employed "slip-and-faller"? I challenge you to put "texting and driving" on your resume as a previous job requirement.

Cruising in the left lane is also illegal in many states. It should be in VA, too.

Top


Anonymous | # November 7, 2010 @ 10:32 PM — Flag Comment

Whine Whine Whine there are lots of distractions while driving. How many of you bleeding hearts put makeup on while driving. There is nothing wrong with using a phone while driving or drinking a bit before had either. If you can walk to your car from the bar you can drive home and you'll be fine. The court system automatically assumes it's the drinker's fault so we won't be able to tell when it actually was their fault. I've seen sober people cough Asians and Canadians cough drive worse than drunks. With DUIs it's really just a few bad apples I and many people I know drive under the influence and you'd never be able to tell. It's about personal responsibility the state doesn't need to interfere.

Top


Sarcasmo | # November 9, 2010 @ 4:39 PM — Flag Comment

I agree. I should be allowed to fly a plane full of C4 around the ADIZ while high on LSD. The government doesn't need to interfere. It's my own personal responsibility. I'm sure none of the other millions of bad apples in the world would like to try this. It's my personal responsibility. No one else's rights are involved.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # November 10, 2010 @ 3:25 AM — Flag Comment

If you got a pilot's license godspeed you know what you can handle better than me, the gov't or some arbitrary number.

Top


Sarcasmo | # November 10, 2010 @ 5:19 PM — Flag Comment

A license?! FASCIST!

Top


Anon | # November 7, 2010 @ 4:07 PM — Flag Comment

Driving while texting is like driving drunk. the other day I was behind someone on a 1 lane rd. here in blacksburg and this guy was weaving everywhere, his left tire crossed the middle lines once in the other ln. then went to the opposite side on the shoulder. When I passed, to no surprise he had a phone in his hand.

If/when I text in the car, it's when I'm at a red light or stopped/parked. Is who ever your talking to SO important that it can't wait until a red light?

Also people cruising in the left lanes even going 5 under the speed limit is so prevalent here in VA especially on US 460. What's funny is that every time I pass on the right do they get the clue and they move over to the right lane.

Reply to this Top


Koi Scrubs | # May 2, 2011 @ 1:59 AM — Flag Comment

Can average news readers or viewers ever tell whether a photograph has been altered? Are there tell-tale signs to look for? <a href="http://www.pskiller.com/">Photoshopped Image Killer</a> has developed a host of tools to accurately identify images that have been altered, especially by Photoshop, the most commonly used image editors at this time.

Reply to this Top