Saving the planet can save the economy

Wednesday, August, 31, 2011; 10:58 PM | 5 | | Print

Share


TOPICS: sustainability

The post-graduation future appears to hold more uncertainty than promise for many college students. With the possibility of another recession looming overhead like a dark cloud, difficulty finding and keeping a job seems imminent. Some are looking to higher education for an escape, but for many that also means racking up expensive loans.

Now, more than ever, is the time to make a serious investment in the environment. Our generation has the opportunity, and I would say responsibility, to save our economy by saving our planet. As students and soon-to-be professionals, it falls on us to provide an efficient and effective solution to both of these pressing matters.

Our population has more than exceeded the Earth’s carrying capacity. Statistics show 60 percent of the world’s coastal waters are polluted, and 20 percent of the world’s population suffers from considerable water shortages. Precious natural features, such as the rain forests and wetlands which are necessary for our survival, are being destroyed for timber and human development. Non-renewable resources including oil, coal and gas are being depleted at a devastating rate. The 1970s witnessed the peak of oil, and in the past decade the increasing gas prices attest to the nose dive in oil supplies. As for coal, many argue that the lifespan of existing coal reserves will last less than a century.

Our staggering population and severe dependence on dirty energy sources to fuel lifestyles not only add to the degradation of our planet, but also compromise the economy. Our government spends nearly $1 billion per day on foreign oil. We could be putting that money toward investing in clean energy sources and reducing our debt to foreign nations. Not only is coal one of the greatest pollutants, the mining takes place predominantly in small towns where individuals rely on blue collar jobs for their livelihood.

Ruthless coal mining companies challenge the financial and physical stability of these individuals by polluting their air and water, and subsequently causing serious ailments such as lung cancer and brain tumors. Those spared the aforementioned hardships are often forced off their property because of its resource rich character. If the working class is the backbone of our economy, are we not jeopardizing our future by placing greater value on a dirty energy source than on the health and homes of these individuals?

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

A version of this article appeared in the Sep 1 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 5 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Arnold | # August 31, 2011 @ 11:12 PM — Flag Comment

Where to begin....
1.) Those oil tycoons and big business you decried? They are the biggest proponents of anthropological global warming. Why? Because they sell the carbon credits and make more money per barrel of oil from the manufactured scarcity that results from the fake thread of global warming.
2.) Why don't environmental activist focus their efforts on REAL threats? You know, like biological pollution from GMO crops, fluoride and other poisons being dumped into municipal waters, and the consolidation of our food industry into Auschwitz Farms like Tyson, Purdue, etc.

Reply to this Top


Brig. Gen. Jack D Ripper | # September 1, 2011 @ 12:09 AM — Flag Comment

I couldn't agree more about the fluoride why do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, for crying out loud children's ice cream. Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works. On no account will a Commie ever drink water, and not without good reason. I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Reply to this Top


Deez | # September 1, 2011 @ 7:33 PM — Flag Comment

Yes, as long as "clean energy" keeps receiving tons of money from taxpayers, it will be a good job field. If somehow the public money poured into it runs dry, it may be the next bubble to burst. Hopefully for "green workers" the politicians in Washington keep stealing money from others and pouring it into the green jobs "sector." If there is a turnover in Washington where the people there no longer force money into that field, it could all go away rather quickly. I'd have a secondary career path just in case.

Reply to this Top


John F | # September 2, 2011 @ 7:03 PM — Flag Comment

The clean energy sector would still be doing fine without tax breaks. There is a multi-year backorder on any large scale solar and wind power unit. The reason we give that sector tax breaks is because it still a small part of the energy market and it is a national priority to grow that sector to meet future needs. We did the same thing to the oil industry 100 some-odd years ago (and somehow they still have those tax breaks today). Clean energy is here to stay, it is just a matter of how fast it grows.

Reply to this Top


Bankrupt Green Company | # September 3, 2011 @ 4:26 PM — Flag Comment

Obama/stimulus-backed green company going bankrupt.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/obama-backed-green-company-bankrupt-14426470

Top