US holds an obligation to the lower class, history shows

Monday, November, 28, 2011; 10:58 PM | 20 | | Print

Share


As I watched the CNBC Republican Presidential Debate, I was reminded of my fiscally conservative cousins. Recently, one of them pontificated that the United States needs a second Great Depression so citizens can learn the values that made their country great again. According to her, we lost our values of responsibility and living within our means that we learned in the 1930s and exercised in the 1950s.

I agree entirely. In the past 15 years, we lost our political will to take responsibility for our economy through smart regulations on industry. Furthermore, we have spent trillions of dollars on tax breaks for people who didn’t need them and wars that were not paid for. In the meantime, we have ignored the needs of the poor and middle class by gutting vital social programs.

After the Great Depression, Franklin D. Roosevelt passed the Glass-Stegal Act’s banking regulations that made investing safe, profitable and relatively predictable. With thousands of people living in Hoovervilles and the banking industry clearly overleveraged, the American people would settle for nothing less than tight limits on how much money banks could lend relative to the capital they maintained on hand.

Banks were still allowed to take risks and make profits, and lending didn’t stop. Our economy recovered initially, then boomed for 30 years. But opaque and reckless banking practices of the 1920s were made illegal. As a people, we took responsibility for making our economy stable and prosperous through collective action to limit the banking practices that lead to the Depression. More importantly, we brought banking practices to light.

Our grandparents (or great-grandparents) saw the economic devastation of the Great Depression, and they knew reckless banking practices in the 20s were to blame. The American people settled for nothing less than Glass-Stegal and the smart regulations it imposed.

Decades later, Lyndon B. Johnson implemented the Great Society, which included Food Stamps, Social Security and Medicare. As a school teacher in Cotulla, Texas, Johnson saw the horrors of poverty that persisted in rural areas firsthand. He saw students who ate one meal a day — a school lunch — and sometimes nothing when classes were not in session. They weren’t dieting. They were extremely poor.

In Congress, the Senate and the White House, Johnson worked to eradicate poverty. He proposed the largest expansion of anti-poverty programs since Roosevelt’s New Deal. Millions of seniors and poor people got basic healthcare, and the schoolchildren Johnson taught in Cotulla could afford to eat more than one meal per school day.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

A version of this article appeared in the Nov 29 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 20 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Hokie01 | # November 29, 2011 @ 8:06 AM — Flag Comment

Yeah that's right - all economic plight is caused by some evil banker in a glass tower, who drinks cocktails made of ground up $100 bills while he stares down in disdain at the huddled masses. Or maybe....just maybe most poverty is the result of a lifetime of poor decisions (having children you can't afford, abusing alcohol/drugs, piling up credit card debt on the latest gadgets....take your pick, they all lead to a lifetime of misery). I know....the bankers probably tricked them into making those decisions....wow they are evil!

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # December 1, 2011 @ 11:49 AM — Flag Comment

Nice strawman. It's a lot easier to just put words in someone's mouth rather than addressing their actual argument, isn't it?

Reply to this Top


Strawman? | # December 1, 2011 @ 3:22 PM — Flag Comment

Uhhhhh....

"Maybe my cousin is right, we do need a second Great Depression. Maybe we do need people to know what poverty is and to see how much damage an unbridled banking sector can do."

Looks like the argument is that nefarious banking practices are the cause of poverty....consider the argument addressed.

Top


Anonymous | # December 1, 2011 @ 11:49 AM — Flag Comment

Nice strawman. It's a lot easier to just put words in someone's mouth rather than addressing their actual argument, isn't it?

Reply to this Top


Obama is 1% | # November 29, 2011 @ 9:54 AM — Flag Comment

Obama received more money from Goldman Sacks in 2008 than every politician running for every level of office COMBINED. And liberals wonder why banks are raking in the money while we all suffer.

Reply to this Top


Kenny Johnson | # December 9, 2011 @ 8:40 PM — Flag Comment

and your source(s) for your claims is/are?

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # March 20, 2012 @ 5:39 PM — Flag Comment

It wasn't President Obama who gave the Banks $750 Billion of unregulated money hoping they would loan it out, It was President Bush.

Reply to this Top


Texas Mike | # November 29, 2011 @ 2:35 PM — Flag Comment

Josh, you need to get your history lessons from a more balanced source. Reagan and Bush 1 both made "deals" with a Democrat-led Congress to lower spending. The Dems proceeded to increase spending. Obama can't even get his own party to get behind his lousy jobs act. It's a canard to throw around in stump speeches, and nothing more. No one voted for the only budget he's ever put forward, because it spent us into oblivion. The Dem congress has flaunted US law by not producing a federal budget for the past several years. They didn't want to go on record with their bloated spending plan before the 2010 elections, so they punted. "Continuing Resolutions" were put forward, and anyone who opposed them were branded as obstructionist.

I drive by the "poor" subsidized housing complexes every day. The "poor" drive cars, have cell phones, kids have bikes, and most of them are overweight. Take a look at pictures of the poor during the Great Depression. Starving, clothes in tatters, living in shanty towns. Today's poor don't have it easy, but most seem to have enough left over after food, clothing, and shelter to pay for an iPhone.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # November 29, 2011 @ 2:52 PM — Flag Comment

I'm glad you said this because I was going to say it. The difference between today and the great depressions is technology which greatly enhances mobility geographically (to where new jobs might be) and the ability to look for, acquire, and participate in commerce. The other main difference is that when the great depression hit people actually believed in savings (not just government funded savings, they actually saved their own salaries - not just rich people, even poor people). now, people just don't save. Those great depression programs were intended to be supplementary to not in lieu of savings (the way it is viewed now).

Reply to this Top


Stop drinking the Koolaid | # November 29, 2011 @ 3:32 PM — Flag Comment

Josh, stop peddling propaganda for Obama and the Democrats. Both parties suck and unless you and everyone else figures it out, this country is screwed.

"In the 1990s, the Republican-controlled Congress repealed Glass-Stegal."

Robert Rubin and Larry Summners from the Democrat Clinton administration pushed for the repeal of Glass-Stegal. Clinton signed the bill that "the Republican-controlled Congress" handed him.

WAKE UP JOSH. Obama is bombing the crap out of people in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen; never closed GITMO; and just last month assassinated three American citizens, included a 16-year-old kid. Stop peddling the wares of this tyrannical child-killer and wake up. Seeing how gullible you and the left are makes me sick.

Reply to this Top


Kenny Johnson | # December 9, 2011 @ 8:43 PM — Flag Comment

WHAT? Obama killed 3 citizens? Really?

Reply to this Top


discount north face | # November 5, 2012 @ 3:52 PM — Flag Comment

I'm curious to find out what blog platform you happen to be utilizing? I'm having some small security problems with my latest site and I would like to find something more safe. Do you have any recommendations?
discount north face http://northfaceclothingcheap2.blogbaker.com/

Reply to this Top


best place to buy dresses | # February 15, 2013 @ 4:40 AM — Flag Comment

Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more from this post. I'm very glad to see such excellent info being shared freely out there. best place to buy dresses http://www.squidoo.com/uk-dresses#module161811092

Reply to this Top


arbooz | # February 26, 2013 @ 5:04 AM — Flag Comment

I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike. arbooz http://arbooz.com/sport-i-otdih-21-c

Reply to this Top


Groomes | # March 25, 2013 @ 6:04 AM — Flag Comment

I can??t really help but appreciate your weblog site, your site is adorable and nice Groomes http://www.21.by/biz-info/4762.html

Reply to this Top


Kirk | # March 26, 2013 @ 12:44 PM — Flag Comment

Say “thanks” you for your parents that they gave you the planet Kirk http://socialnetworkla.com/socialnetworkla/clothing-net-the-number-one-online-store-for-chinese-clothing-and.html

Reply to this Top


Celine Online | # March 29, 2013 @ 11:10 AM — Flag Comment

Hi, i think that i saw you visited my weblog so i came to eturn the favor?I'm trying to find things to improve my website!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!! Celine Online http://celineonline.v5s7.com

Reply to this Top


Eljo | # April 2, 2013 @ 5:23 AM — Flag Comment

It’s truly a great and helpful piece of info. Eljo http://worldtranslation.org/news/222-amd-move-its-forces-to-the-mobile-market.html

Reply to this Top


Frauen Timberland Sandalen Stiefel | # April 13, 2013 @ 3:04 AM — Flag Comment

qqwivnwt <a href="http://www.timberlandschuhede.eu/26-womens-timberland-sandalen-stiefel/" title="Frauen Timberland Sandalen Stiefel">Frauen Timberland Sandalen Stiefel</a>

Reply to this Top


cheap jordans | # April 14, 2013 @ 8:48 PM — Flag Comment

I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in your new posts.

Reply to this Top