Print Comment Email Affirmative Action banned from some schools
Kerry O'Conner, CT News Reporter
Thursday, November 1; 12:00 AM
On Nov. 7, 2006, the state of Michigan voted to enact Proposal 2, which essentially banned affirmative action from the selection process in Michigan public universities. Because of a similar proposal enacted in California in 1996, both the University of Michigan and the University of California at Los Angeles were forced to brainstorm alternative initiatives to maintain diversity.

Ward Connerly, the chair of the California campaign and a primary supporter of the Michigan campaign, said that it is good for the universities to face the truth about the stereotypes affirmative action perpetuates when used as a tool for diversity.

"They want diversity, and what they mean by that is that they want a certain percentage, or what they call 'critical mass,' of black and Latino students," Connerly said. "We all know there is an academic gap between these students, and if you take away affirmative action, you take away the ability of universities to discriminate, and they want to be able to discriminate."

Linda Green, the director of communication of the division of student affairs at Michigan University, does not want to accept this assumption because she is afraid it will prevent minority students from applying.

"That's the real story here at Michigan, is that we feel very strongly about maintaining a diverse campus," Green said. "The reason diversity is important is students have to want to come to a campus that is welcoming to all people."

While Connerly agrees diversity is important in universities, he believes affirmative action sometimes does more bad than it does good. He said it presumes black and Latino students cannot compete with Asian and white students, which perpetuates a damaging stereotype.

"I don't think any of us want to be viewed as if we are less capable than someone else," Connerly said. "Senator Barrack Obama said 'conjugating your verbs properly is not acting white.' That comment speaks to a certain social problem we have to address if we want to cure the academic gap between most black and Latino kids, and Asian and white kids."

Although the proposal did not take effect until late December 2006, after much of Michigan's rolling admission had already been decided, the university is now taking steps to ensure it sustains diversity in student body, faculty and staff.

This Friday, Michigan will be hosting a half-day summit for students called Climate Matter, which will focus on campus diversity. In addition to the summit, the university has been sending representatives to primarily minority schools in Michigan cities to teach middle school and high school students that they are capable of attending the university as long as they work hard to reach the requirements.

While Proposal 2 prevents public grants to students based on race, it does not affect private organizations. The Alumni Association of the University of Michigan, a private organization, announced it would offer scholarships to students considering their race and gender.

Currently, Virginia Tech has an affirmative action policy in its admission process that it calls an equal opportunity policy.

"Diversity is absolutely important," said Amy Wider, public relations coordinator for Virginia Tech admissions. "As part of an educational institution it is important to have diversity of viewpoints, of location, and of all types of categories because the more that is available, the more opportunities we have to learn."

Connerly is currently pushing initiatives in Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. Virginia is not one of the 23 states that allow citizens to put initiatives on ballots, which allows citizen-proposed statewide mandates such as Michigan's Proposal 2.

Add your opinion
Posted by: Jason T at 11/04/07 The point is that affirmative action gives preferential treatment. It is another problem entirely if preferential treatment is given to any other groups, like the legacies mentioned below, but you don't solve one discriminatory act by trying to balance it with another. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Jason T at 11/04/07 The Obama quote is the most poignant part of this article. There are white people and minorities that have no business being in a university. The fact is that if admissions standards are tied to race rather than academic aptitude, we are effectively saying racial diversity can only be achieved through intellectual diversity (a nice way of saying "letting dumb minority kids in with the smart white kids"), which is hopefully not what is truly necessary to create ethnic diversity. Schools should admit the most scholastically qualified applicants at any given time, regardless of ethnicity. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Kathryn at 11/04/07 one's race isn't what puts them ahead in life. haha. that's hilarious. one of the hardest things for us white people to accept is that it isn't just 'our hard work' that gets us ahead. it's that our work is recognized and rewarded throughout our entire lives, making it easy for us to point to our individual patterns of achievement. Many people without white privilege have more to fight against to even get to the level where achievements are recognized and talents are nurtured in the first place. That doesn't mean white people don't work hard, it just means we are privileged to be part of the system in power where 'individual' achievement gets noticed at all. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Lee Hawkins at 11/02/07 yeah, cuz we ALL know that the legacy system here at VT is no form of Affirmative action at ALL!!! Flag Abuse
Posted by: Chris at 11/01/07 It's def. University of Michigan, not Michigan University. Haha, you'll find us Michigan kids correcting people on stuff like this all the time. And feel fortunate that there's no affirmative action in VA. Flag Abuse
Posted by: at 11/01/07 and if you know anything about the history of affirmative action, its basis was created for aiding creating equality for caucasian women Flag Abuse
Posted by: at 11/01/07 work less in high school???? If you are not qualified, affirmative action does NOT help you, it only helps those people of color that are qualified, let's get that straight right away Flag Abuse
Posted by: ct1220 at 11/01/07 Something that bugs me a lot is how readily people equate "race" with "diversity." How different would the life styles be between a wealthy middle class black person and a wealthy middle class white person who live in the same neighborhood, the same school and receive the same education, believe in the religion, celebrate the same holidays, and essentially possess much of the same values? Of course the answer is "affirmative action also takes into account national origin." Again, equating national origin with diversity is also a mistake. That makes the bold assumption that ALL people raised in a certain location share the same perspectives, values, and etc. Perspectives and values are something that the individual develops throughout her/his life based on how she/he interacts/reacts with what is around them and what is accessible to them. Hence, these perspectives are best seen through personal statements and essays, NOT racial status or national origin. So I think diversity is no excuse for wanting affirmative action, or racism. I think the ability to think reflectively on one's life is a luxury. Only those who are free from having to worry about the next day's meal and being able to pay next month's rent can afford to spend time reflecting on their existence, their values, their world views, and etc. Therefore a policy used to level the playing field for people of different socio-economic statuses would be more justified. How justified would be another good question. It's a very interesting topic to discuss. Everyone seeks upward social mobility, and higher education is a great way to catalyze that process. The question is how can we possibly aspire to have everyone moving up the social ladder? Who will be digging our ditches and doing the manual labor in our industries if everyone wants to be a doctor or lawyer? Who deserves to have these aspirations? Does any particular group deserve it more than another group? We should be tackling questions such as these instead of instituting policies that put too much value into superficial terms such as "diversity." Flag Abuse
Posted by: carpdie at 11/01/07 thank goodness, affirmative action is a totally RIDICULOUS policy. admissions officers are ignorant, if they are going to let students into a university while using race as a factor...there is NO SENSE in that. man if only i was born with a different skin color, hell i could work less in high school and still attend any affirmative action college. the world will really advance that way guys, seriously, clever. sure there are tons of smart and deserving minorities out there, but how dare someone take skin color, something no human can control (except michael jackson of course) and weigh that in the options. one's race isn't what puts them ahead in life. i could go on and on giving specific examples, etc. but there's no reason to. you're either against it or for it. Flag Abuse
about | advertising | archive | contact | headline emails | join us | subscribe
© 1998-2008 Collegiate Times. All stories, photos etc. produced by the Collegiate Times are property of the Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech. No information may be republished without the expressed written consent of the editor of the Collegiate Times.
» Compare Prices
» Smith Mountain Lake Condos
» Student Loan Consolidation
» Virginia Tech Hokies
» Basic Computer Terminology
» Cricket News
» College NFL MLB Neon Signs
» Student Credit Cards
» Diamond Necklace Pendant
» Student Loan Consolidation
» Software Downloads
» Career Schools