Delegates seek to loosen gun restrictions
Thursday, January 17, 2008; 12:00 AM
Many Virginia congressional representatives have increased their efforts to pass legislation in favor of stricter gun control policies since the Virginia Tech campus shootings last April.

Though such bills have had a tough time making it through the largely Republican Congress in the past, many felt that the shootings would bring to light the supposed need for harsher gun-related laws. However, since the General Assembly began its annual session Jan. 9, some bills appear to loosen gun control.

One such bill, presented by Republican Delegate Mark Cole, would prohibit any state entity from restricting the "purchase, possession, transfer, ownership, carrying, storage, or transporting of firearms, ammunition, or components or combinations thereof, unless expressly authorized by statue."

"It would just say that state agencies cannot adopt regulations more strict than state law concerning guns," Cole said of his bill. "This bill does not include colleges; it's just strictly state agencies. I specifically left colleges out of it just because I know, with the Virginia Tech tragedy, that it's a very emotional issue right now."

Although Cole said that he did not present his bill in direct opposition to recent legislation promoting stricter gun control, he said that he did not think the tragedy called for such harsher gun-related laws.

"Virginia Tech was basically a gun-free zone (on April 16)," Cole said. "You can't get more strict gun control than that, and that really didn't protect anybody."

A ban on all guns on Tech's campus has been in place for several decades, although Virginia code does not mention guns in relation to public universities.

One bill that Republican Delegate Bob Marshall hopes will help to impede a similar incident regards colleges' full-time faculty members.

Shortly after the April 16 shootings, a professor at George Mason University told Marshall that the knowledge of instructors' possession of guns might discourage attackers. Marshall's bill would allow faculty members who have a valid Virginia concealed handgun permit to carry their firearms on campus.

"I thought that this could be a way to beef up security and not cost a lot of money," Marshall said, adding that anyone who possesses a concealed handgun permit has gone through a clearance process and demonstrated some proficiency handling a gun.

Republican Delegate C. Todd Gilbert proposed a similar bill in 2005, but it dealt with students who have obtained valid concealed handgun permits. The bill was killed in committee.     

This session, Gilbert has presented a related bill that would restrict colleges' boards of visitors from prohibiting any person's possession of a handgun on state property if he or she possesses a valid concealed handgun permit. His proposition has been referred to the Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety, where both Cole and Marshall's bills also landed.

Some doubt that more guns on campuses would prevent or help stop events like those of April 16. Chad Ramsey, spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, advocated fighting back efforts to get more firearms on campus.

"We think there ought to be efforts made to ensure that the background check database is more complete, so you have all of the mental health and felony records at the state level," Ramsey said. "We think that the gun show loophole ought to be closed to ensure that background checks are conducted on every gun sale."

Among the other six bills proposed since Jan. 9 that oppose stricter gun laws is one which would allow hired security officers to carry guns into private schools and child day care centers, and a bill allowing people who lawfully possess firearms to carry a handgun in his or her car or boat if it is locked in a container or compartment. The General Assembly session is scheduled to last for 60 days, but a longer meeting would not be unusual.

You might be interested in... Related Topics:
Posted by: Andy at Jan 17 Imagine getting in your car and going for a drive. You leave Blacksburg and make your way across the Commonwealth. As you drive each locality has different laws for operating a motor vehicle, but these rules are not reflected on any road signs. Speed limits are not posted, so you have to read and be knowledgable about the laws in different areas before your trip begins so that you don't do something illegal. I think we can agree that this would be very difficult to deal with. Well, that is what gun owners have to deal with. Ambiguous and unconstitutional laws that gun owners have to try to decipher. As I know from experience, law enforcement officers will not interpret the law and it isn't that easy to get in touch with attorney generals in order to have someone explain the varied local laws around the state in order to make sure you aren't breaking the law. Gun owners who possess firearms legally love peace, law and order and these varied laws make it difficult to move about freely. The fact is that there should be no guns passed at the local level of government. Of course as a reminder, criminals do not adhere to federal, state, or local laws so put as many as you want on the books, they will do nothing to stop criminal use of firearms. Lastly, the Constituion of the Unites States gives certain authority to the federal gov, grants certain authorities to the states, and the rest of the authority lies with the PEOPLE. Public universities instituting gun bans? Where do they get their authority? A small group of people (university president, board of visitors, etc) making decisions regarding guns on campus is completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. Since when do we let a few people decide what is legal or not, especially when it comes to the use of public property. Those of us who are a part of this Commonwealth and pay taxes here are the owners of OUR public property and it seems weird to me to allow a few people in local gov or a university to make these decisions that affect all of us. Those people out there who are anti-gun don't really care about this issue, but when different localities begin passing laws requiring citizens to show their papers when crossing a county line or some other ridiculous law you will begin to care. When you get pulled over in Giles county for making a right on red that is perfectly legal in Christiansburg, you may begin to care. At some point you will encounter some ridiculous uncontitutional law that deeply affects you, but there won't be anything you can do because we will have empowered our elected officials to take away countless other rights and they aren't going to care about what you have to say. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Fred at Jan 17 Gun free zone designation sure didn't protect Virginia Tech on April 16th, it only helped ensure Cho that his selected random victims would be primed for easy, defenseless slaughter. He could have been easily stopped if a law abiding CCW permit holder were present, but instead, all students could do was get on the floor and hope not to be shot. Flag Abuse
Add your opinion
Copyright © 2008 Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech Inc. All rights reserved.
about | advertising | archive | contact | print edition | headline emails | join us | subscribe
All stories, photos etc. produced by the Collegiate Times are property of the Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech. No information may be republished without the expressed written consent of the editor of the Collegiate Times.
» Virginia Tech
» VT webmail
» VT People Search
» My VT / Hokie Spa
» VT Blackboard
» gmail