Print Comment Email Editorial: JuicyCampus.com is not productive or necessary
CT Editorial Board
Wednesday, February 20; 12:00 AM
Publicity has risen for JuicyCampus.com, a gossip Web site centered on campus life.

Similar to "Gossip Girl," the book series and television show, students can anonymously post any sort of "juicy" information on their classmates.

There are no content restrictions; students are free to discuss the sexual encounters, romantic lives, friend issues or weight gains of anyone on campus.

Because Matt Ivester, the creator of the site, is a Duke University graduate, the Web site was originally open to only Duke-related gossip.

Now, the number of colleges involved in the site has increased to include about 50 schools. Thousands of hateful threads have been posted, ranging from lists of sluttiest girls on campus to homophobic and anti-Semitic rants.

In a positive turn for a generation generally considered to have a high interest in the gossip and downfalls of celebrities and peers, students are showing their disgust at the Web site in masses. Ivester has received complaints and calls from organizations of the schools included in JuicyCampus.com, requesting that the site be shut down.

It's a relief to hear that, despite the originally high use of the site, students are starting to realize that such gossip sites are both unproductive and unnecessary. Such a site will only succeed in perpetuating intolerance and malice.

There is no reason that Ivester and his Web site should sponsor a forum where forms of intolerance are welcome.

Some innocent topics are fair game for online discussion. However, a Web site that allows for discussion boards devoted to ruining reputations and insulting entire demographics is completely uncalled for.

Plenty of people have seen the danger in posting seemingly unattractive pieces of themselves on Facebook or MySpace.

Many students make sure to keep their Facebook or MySpace pages free from drug, alcohol or sexual references in order to keep a clean reputation for potential employers who are using the networks.

Unfortunately, because of JuicyCampus.com, the effort you make to maintain a clean reputation could go down the drain because of one classmate who decides to post your weekend escapades using your full name. These posts can damage careers and amount to little more than anonymous libel.

Ivester has done one thing correctly with the site, however. While he won't give the IP addresses of posters to anyone who complains of content that is too cruel, in the event of a post containing threats of campus violence, such as a school shooting, Ivester will provide any information to authorities that could assist in tracking down the poster. In the wake up the North Illinois shootings, at least Ivester can identify the importance of taking such content seriously.

JuicyCampus.com depends on advertising to keep the Web site up, and the advertising only continues if the traffic on the Web site continues.

Do your part to prevent this site from including Virginia Tech in its gossip by refusing to visit the site. Don't feed into the frenzy from this site or any other copycats that may arise.

The editorial board is composed of Amie Steele, Joe Kendall, Saira Haider, Laurel Colella and Sara Mitchell.

Add your opinion
Posted by: Jason T at Feb 22 Maybe it was the rare lunar eclipse alignment that tugged the neurons in my brain in a different direction. Perhaps it can also be held responsible for your near topple out of your seat. Cheers. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Anonymous Coward at Feb 20 Jason T, are you moderately agreeing with the CT's editorial board here? I almost fell out of my chair. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Jason T at Feb 20 Personally, I think it will be interesting to see if/when the first claim of libel arises and the webmaster is forced to turn over their records to help identify some coward who took things too far. I have no idea if that is even possible, but I would revel in seeing such a garbage website go down in flames. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Lee Hawkins at Feb 20 I do agree with you on this issue BUT i HAVE to question the precedent that this could set if complaints were allowed to determine whether free speech prospers or not. Muslims are complaining about wikipedia putting up images or muhammed but the posting of the images is free speech so they cant do anything about it. The two circumstances are similar. Muslims believe (from what they've said in comments about wikipedia) that allowing images of their prophet is humiliating. So you have a group of people humiliated about whats being posted on an American website. And you have the exact same situation with JuicyCampus.com. I personally wouldnt want to end up on their, so i feel for everyone but what if any group in the country could tell you what you could and couldnt say in an open forum, wouldnt you feel censored? What does strike me though is slander though. Slander shouldnt be allowed. You cant claim slander against an anonymous poster though. Most people on that site are probably cowards because they wouldnt say those things if their own names were attached to it. They also know theyd most likely get sued or injured by the people they were 'outing'. Flag Abuse
about | advertising | archive | contact | headline emails | join us | subscribe
© 1998-2008 Collegiate Times. All stories, photos etc. produced by the Collegiate Times are property of the Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech. No information may be republished without the expressed written consent of the editor of the Collegiate Times.
» Compare Prices
» Smith Mountain Lake Condos
» Student Loan Consolidation
» Virginia Tech Hokies
» Basic Computer Terminology
» Cricket News
» College NFL MLB Neon Signs
» Student Credit Cards
» Diamond Necklace Pendant
» Student Loan Consolidation
» Software Downloads
» Career Schools