The Collegiate Times has ceased publication until Jan. 20, 2009.
Letter: Allow college athletes to major in their sport of choice
Wednesday, November 19, 2008; 12:00 AM

College sports have a problem. No, I am not talking about rampant recruiting violations or the farce that is the BCS.

I'm not even talking about how the WAC is not considered a "major" conference, despite the fact that they are clearly better than the Big East, ACC and the Pac-10 minus USC.

The NCAA's biggest problem is the growing joke of the student-athlete.

Don't get me wrong -- the student-athlete is far from dead. Most athletes take school very seriously, major in something that really interests them and eventually "go pro in something other than sports," as the ACC commercial goes.

No, the problem arises when you get players such as Reggie Bush, Matt Leinart or Kevin Durant, who could care less about school and are only there because the rules tell them they have to before they can go make millions.

While this problem is far more pronounced in basketball, where the great players only need to stay academically eligible for one semester to play before going pro, the situation in football is not much better.

Look at the current top 5, according to Rivals.com: Alabama graduates 49 percent of its players, Texas Tech 79 percent, Texas 42 percent, Florida 72 percent and Oklahoma 44 percent (Virginia Tech football is 72 percent).

These low numbers can be partially attributed to the fact that since they send so many players to the pros, many of them do not graduate before leaving.

Personally, I think these numbers should embarrass their universities. If a school's job is to educate its students and you have people such as Knowshon Moreno enrolled, you might as well help them out, as you would any other student.

This is why I propose that schools start offering football and basketball as majors. I know it sounds crazy, but think about it; the professional sports industry is a multi-billion dollar industry, yet athletics are looked at as just an extra-curricular activity at schools. Tim Tebow does well in school (He has a 3.77 GPA, according to UFL.edu), but is he really going to use his degree in Family, Youth and Community Sciences, if he evens stays long enough to earn it?

The answer is no. Tebow went to Florida to become an NFL player, the same way I came to Tech to become a mechanical engineer and you did to become what you want to be.

It's not fair for someone who is gifted mentally to make the most of her talent by going to medical school, but a gifted athlete has to pick a ruse major, as his athletic prowess is not sharp enough.

Here is how this system will be implemented. First, these majors have to be extremely exclusive, only the best of the best should get in (think Harvard Law). This ensures that only those players who are surefire future professional athletes are allowed in, because this major will be pretty useless for anyone who doesn't make it as an athlete.

It will be a 2 year to 3 year program, since this is about how long these players usually stay. The core curriculum will involve in-class advanced strategy, as well as business classes to help them manage their money once they get out, since according to the Toronto Star, roughly 60 percent of NBA players go broke within five years of retiring.

I think this system would ultimately raise the level of play in the NBA and NFL as well as the NCAA because I think players will stick around school for another year or so to finish this degree.

It will make them more intelligent about the game they play, plus their skills will be more refined from more time in college.

Players would also come out of school older and more mature, with a better sense of money management, which will help them in the long run.

And how sweet would a master's in football from Penn State or a B.A. in basketball from UCLA sound?

Matt Gagnon

senior, mechanical engineering You might be interested in...

Related Topics: athletes, majors, letter
Posted by: Anonymous at 12/02/08 At least if they allowed kids to major in sports, the history majors would have someone to laugh at. Flag Abuse
Posted by: THE at 12/01/08 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/john_rolfe/08/22/sports.majors/index.html HAHA I have support Flag Abuse
Posted by: THE at 11/29/08 Well Texas Mike, I guess that's where we defer. I would take 100 Vick's if it meant winning a national championship before I would take 1 Myron Rolle and not win. To me, winning is everything, if you can look respectable doing it, then that's better, but the W is paramount to everything. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Texas Mike at 11/26/08 The purpose of a university is higher education, not fielding a good sports team. Sports generate revenue and help recruit students, but they are not the focus of a university. The NCAA is all about student athletes, although the dollar signs have clouded that over the years. College sports is not about farm teams for the pros. I would rather see Tech pass on the next Michael or Marcus Vick than to further tarnish the school by offering a fake major to help some cocky ball player go pro. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Hokie Hi at 11/25/08 OK, I'll give you the Mountain West but not the WAC, so glad you cleared that up. But still that only applies to this year because when have they had two teams that have been that good besides that one year Utah had with Urban Meyer? And expect this same system until the BCS realizes what the rest of the country knows...the BCS sucks and isn't what is best for the NCAA, as the seem to claim. Flag Abuse
Posted by: THE at 11/24/08 And to everyone else, I didn't mean anything negative about David Robinson, I was just responding to the previous poster who claimed David was putting his education ahead of basketball by going to the Naval Academy, and I corrected him saying he was in fact putting his country ahead of basketball, which is a very honorable thing to do. I'm not sure how anyone took anything negative out of that comment, but whatever. Bottom line, I don't see how anyone can be all high and mighty and tell a gifted athlete that sports absolutely can not be their top priority. If someone is going to make a career out of their athletic ability, and make a ton of money doing so, why should anyone stand in their way and tell them they need to follow someone else's priority list. (School, and then sports) Like I said, there are people majoring, MAJORING, in dance, art and music! Where are all you guys with your god-given, set in stone, priority list telling those people that dance can't be their main focus while at school? At least in sports (Football, basketball...) there is legitimate potential to make great money. Seriously, what can you do with a degree in dance that you can't do with one in athletics if you don't "make it?" Flag Abuse
Posted by: THE matt gagnon at 11/24/08 First of all, thanks Hokie Hi, I meant the Mountain West (Utah, TCU, BYU..), but accidentally said the WAC, nice catch. All I mean there is that I don't think any conference should get an automatic BCS bid because these "mid-major" conference champs can be just as good in some years. There should at least be a minimum ranking you must have at the end of the year to get that auto bid, because neither the ACC nor Big East champ will be ranked any higher than 16 this year, so to give them automatic bids to games that should be reserved for the top 8 teams is wrong. The BCS games should be the top 8 teams, period. No Notre Dame exemptions, no major conference champ automatic bids, just the top 8. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Hokie Hi at 11/23/08 Please let us all know your argument for how the WAC should be a "major-conference" and is better than the ACC, Big East, and Pac-10. Boise State is the only talented team in that league, so tell me how any of the other teams in the WAC: Fresno State, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana Tech, Nevada, New Mexico State, San Jose State, and Utah State deserve any merit to be even mentioned for a BCS bowl. Yes they're records might look good, but when you play a cupcake schedule like this it's not too difficult to win 10 games a year, yet the second best team in that league this year is Louisiana Tech at a mere 7-4. Yes the ACC, Big East, and Pac-10 are down this year, but you cannot sit here and tell me in a good year the WAC is better. And on a side note, never disrespect one of the classiest guys in NBA history in David Robinson. Patriotism for this country should be commended. Flag Abuse
Posted by: anonymous at 11/23/08 Robert Gallery & Tiki Barber are great examples too. Jake Long also chose to stay at Michigan, as his scouting combine interview reveals in part, because he "really really wanted to get his degree." Flag Abuse
Posted by: The Other-other-other Anonymous at 11/23/08 Funny how an anonymous idiot, as you say, can realize how embarrassed your mother must be for you to have insulted one of the NBA's greatest players ever by critiquing his academic priorities, not to mention his patriotism, in choosing Annapolis, over any other school, and then serving as a navel officer before moving on into a professional basketball career. If anything, David Robinson ranks a cut above any other example, and as it stands, it seems as though you can't even display the maturity to acknowledge the type of commitment that former college athlete put forth not only toward his own academic success, but to serve his country by choice, as well. You should read his biography - I mean, since you're the alleged die-hard sports fan...I hear wikipedia's knucklehead friendly, give it a shot! Flag Abuse
Posted by: THE matt gagnon at 11/23/08 MAN, I get sick of being right all the time Flag Abuse
Posted by: THE matt gagnon at 11/23/08 And why don't you man up and leave your name. Or are you going to keep hiding behind 'Anonymous' so nobody else can see how dumb your "arguments" are. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Matt Gagnon at 11/23/08 HAHAHAHA what an idiot. He put his country ahead of sports, not his schooling. He went to Navy, which required him to serve 2 years after graduation before he could go to the NBA. This had nothing to do with his education, it was his dedication to his country, not school. Nice try though, idiot Flag Abuse
Posted by: Anonymous at 11/23/08 HAHAHAHA, burnnnnn. There's one moron. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Anonymous at 11/21/08 David Robinson. Go back to your hole Gagnon Flag Abuse
Posted by: Matt Gagnon at 11/21/08 Exactly. His motivation to come back was football, not his education. Outside of Myron Rolle, I want you to find me ONE D1 football/basketball player who is a lock future pro, who has in any way displayed that his education is truly of higher priority than his sport. Just one. Find me one legit player who has put his school work ahead of his sport and MAYBE I'll see your point. Until then, we will all have to assume that sports are these guys number 1 priority, as it should be, since that is how they are going to get paid when they leave school. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Hokie Hokie at 11/21/08 "But to say Leinart stayed another year to finish his degree is bogus. He could have taken one class over the summer if that was really his only reason for staying. He stayed because he wanted to win another national championship and Heisman so he could potentially go down as the greatest QB in college history." And your point is...? Even if this was the case, that comment completely contradicts everything you wrote about in the column above. You state most athletes don't care about education and only stay 2-3 years, yet Leinart stayed 5 years and now somehow that's bogus because he passed up the money that year for one more shot at a national title. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Gobble Gobble at 11/20/08 Great article. I think this is a very interesting idea. The world would be a better place if there were more open minded thinkers like you. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Matt Gagnon at 11/20/08 ok my bad I picked a bad example. But to say Leinart stayed another year to finish his degree is bogus. He could have taken one class over the summer if that was really his only reason for staying. He stayed because he wanted to win another national championship and Heisman so he could potentially go down as the greatest QB in college history. And Tebow is a smart guy, do you really think he would be majoring in Community Service if he weren't going to the NFL? No, he would get a real major that he could actually get a job with.... don't believe the hype. And you are right. I am the most badass dude at Tech. Thanks Flag Abuse
Posted by: Hokie 07 at 11/20/08 You have to be one of the most arrogant, egotistical, jacka$$es @ Tech. It seems that you have been great @ getting your point across about FB... 3 years and you still haven't gotten him fired! I think everyone below already proved YOU WRONG. Matt Leinart did get a degree and you clearly know NOTHING about Tim Tebow. If he does leave early, he will most certainly get his degree later. He also uses his major as others pointed out. So how about you get a clue? Flag Abuse
Posted by: Matt Gagnon - the writer at 11/20/08 ...And Kevin Durant claims he is going to take 2 classes a summer until he graduates. Umm, how long do you give that? Do you really see him still doing that 10-15 years from now, which is about how long it will take him to graduate at this pace? Or do you think he'll realize he needs to spend his summers honing his real craft, basketball, to make sure his current checks keep coming, because I can promise you that major in sociology he seems so eager to get doesn't pay like an NBA all-star. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Matt Gagnon - the writer at 11/20/08 And please, by all means join my group "Fire Frank Beamer" and try to argue against me. I've been arguing this point for almost 3 years with every kind of Tech fan and have yet to hear one compelling argument for him. But let's leave that to that group and leave this message board to how right I am about this degree program Flag Abuse
Posted by: Matt Gagnon - the writer at 11/20/08 First of all, whoever said this degree would "cheapen that of those at the same college" needs to get a life. You can major in dance at Stanford but nobody thinks any less of that school because of it. I see this major fitting into the same category as degrees in music, acting, or art. Really no academic merit, but still something you can to do professionally. The only difference is there is huge money to be had in sports. I wrote this article as a diehard sports fan. I’m sick of watching players who just don’t understand how to play their games. They may have all the talent in the world, but are clueless about any real strategy. This is why so many players are forced into retirement as soon as their skills begin to diminish because they aren’t smart enough to compensate for the fact that they are no longer at their physical peak. Things like Brian Westbrook taking a knee last year, rather than score an easy TD, which allowed the Eagles to run out the clock, rather than give the ball back to the Cowboys and risk a freak comeback, should be commonplace, not strange occurances. A few years ago, Tracy McGrady was told by then coach Stan Van Gundy to break the other team’s zone, he famously responded, “I don’t know how.” Flag Abuse
Posted by: Get Real at 11/19/08 You don't know what you're talking about. You mention Kevin Durant as some person who could care less about school. Then why has he been at UT-Austin for the past two summers even though he is now a multi millionaire with endorsements from Nike and other companies, on top of his big NBA contract? Some athletes like Durant like to learn. Let me guess, you think because he left school early he doesn't care about school? How about his earning potential is basically inverse to any other student. He probably won't be in the NBA when he's 40, so he might as well earn money now. He can ALWAYS go back to school. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Respond to Eh at 11/19/08 Leinart stayed an extra semester because you only get to be a heisman trophy winning QB and reap the benefits of SoCal girls once in a lifetime. The guy was a celebrity who played the field better than he ever did / will on the gridiron. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Anonymous at 11/19/08 Look at all the non D-I Schools. Its difficult to call the student athlete dead when the majority of colleges still put academics before sports. Most of those schools still perform very well in the low-visibility sports (cross country, soccer to a point, track & field, etc.) Flag Abuse
Posted by: FB at 11/19/08 Sweet Facebook, brah. Creater of the "Fire Frank Beamer" group?? You're just full of terrible ideas. Flag Abuse
Posted by: HokieAlum at 11/19/08 The letter writer alleges that student-athletes are a joke but proposes to cheapen their educations- and the educations of those attending the same university- by allowing them to major in... A SPORT?? A physical activity is not an academic endeavor. The closest legitimate major would be a Sports Management degree, which VT unfortunately does not offer. A "Football" or "Basketball" degree would require classes in statistics, law, business, psychology, communications, biology, and engineering to cover at least some of the important aspects of a sport. Tim Tebow won't use his major in Community Sciences? Are we talking about the same Tim Tebow who is famous for his missonary work in the Philippines? He hasn't even graduated and is already clearly benefitting from his education. The entire point of college is to get an education, and it is up to the individual athletes to make the most of their time as a student. Lowering expectations - and standards - for student-athletes would undermine the essence of the larger college experience for everyone. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Eh at 11/18/08 Matt Leinart stayed an extra semester and took one class just so he could continue playing college football, after he won the Heisman Trophy. Flag Abuse
Posted by: Yeah... at 11/18/08 The go pro in something other than sports thing is from an NCAA commercial. Ironically you make that mistake after saying student-athletes are a joke. What you really meant to say was the opinions editor that actually approved this crap for print is a joke. Flag Abuse
Add your opinion
Copyright © 2008 Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech Inc. All rights reserved.
about | advertising | archive | contact | print edition | headline emails | join us | subscribe
All stories, photos etc. produced by the Collegiate Times are property of the Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech. No information may be republished without the expressed written consent of the editor of the Collegiate Times.
» Virginia Tech
» VT webmail
» VT People Search
» My VT / Hokie Spa
» VT Blackboard
» gmail