Blame shouldn't land on Thomas alone

Wednesday, September, 26, 2012; 9:51 PM | 3 | | Print

Logan Thomas (3) runs the ball until tackled at the one yard line.

Share


After the first quarter of Saturday’s game against Bowling Green, the score was tied 0-0 and it was beginning to look like another dismal performance from the offense.

At this point I can bet that either you or someone around you was talking about benching quarterback Logan Thomas and putting in backup Mark Leal.

Let me try to put this in perspective for you: Thomas gives the Hokies a better chance to win than Leal. Period. The coaches know what they are doing — that is why they get paid. Just in case that statement is not enough to persuade you to stop berating the starting quarterback when he makes a mistake, let me try to break it down for you.

First and foremost, if you follow Tech football at all, then you are sure to already know this: Thomas does not have the supporting cast he had last year. Four new offensive linemen, one receiver he has thrown to before and the starting running backs are seeing their first major playing time on the field. He simply does not have the experience around him to take off some of the load.

This brings me to my next point for the initial struggle for Thomas, which is Tech's lack of a running game. Now I am a little reluctant to say this after the Bowling Green game where the Hokies had 246 total rushing yards. If you watched the game you could probably tell that after Tech began running the ball effectively, the passing game was much better.

When the defense does not have to respect the run, they only have to focus on the air attack. The defensive backs will get on the line and jam receivers every play making it hard to run the correct route. The defense will also only have to send the four down lineman to rush the quarterback. Linebackers are then free to drop into coverage since they do not have to clog up running holes.

In theory, this should give a quarterback more time to pass the ball, but once again the Hokies have an offensive line that is still trying to break in four new starters. The line really has not given Logan more than a second or two to pass the ball. This past weekend Logan was either scrambling outside the collapsing pocket, or getting hit as he threw the ball on most of the passing plays.

Now I am not trying to put the blame on everyone else on the offense — some of the problem is Thomas’ fault. As most have already pointed out, he has been throwing the ball off his back foot too much, causing many of his throws to sail past receivers. 

Thomas has had a tough start to this season, but if you compare his first four games this year to last year, he is performing better against more challenging opponents. He has thrown more touchdowns, more passing yards and the same number of interceptions.

All I am saying is, before you go out and attack Thomas for not living up to your standards as a quarterback, remember this is a completely different team from last year. I implore you to stop criticizing the offense for not being high-scoring and flashy. Tech is a ground-and-pound school that will see much better results from its quarterback throughout the year, so long as it can make defenses respect the run. 

A version of this article appeared in the Sep 27 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 3 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Adam | # September 27, 2012 @ 10:21 AM — Flag Comment

No one is criticizing the offense for not being flashy. Crossing routes, quick-developing run plays, and opportunistic playcalling are not flashy. We are criticizing the offense for being ineffecient, uncoordinated, and confused. We criticize the lack of fundamentals, the inconsistent schemes, and the absence of adjustments and progress. We don't require a high-scoring offense, but we certainly shouldn't have a low-scoring offense.

Reply to this Top


microsoft office 2010 download | # September 28, 2012 @ 12:27 AM — Flag Comment

If you own a business, you can get a little HP PC and use it just for accounting and the costs won't be that bad even if you are <a href="http://www.thisisoffice.com/microsoft-office-2010-key-c-43.html">activate office 2010</a> a Mac shop.Early in your setting up stage you will need to register for tax, once you've decided what type of entity you will be i.The client in most cases is transparent to the end users, enforcing policies in the background.For evidence of the power of tribes, look no further than Gap's disastrous attempt to launch a new logo in October 2010.Podcasts Reinforce Learning - According to e - Marketer, an Internet research group based in New York, the number of Podcast users grew to 11.Malware writers keep updating rootkits and their malicious attacking methods, as anti malware tools become able to detect them.
<a href="http://www.thisisoffice.com/" title="microsoft office 2010 download">microsoft office 2010 download</a>

Reply to this Top


windows 7 upgrade key | # September 28, 2012 @ 2:43 AM — Flag Comment

HIMSS Exhibition provides an opportunity for vendors and users to meet and interact.Registry cleaners are used to scan through this part of your system and repair the various problems that are inside it.To make and communicate dynamic presentation with your audience, Power - Point 2010 provide you <a href="http://www.myoffice2010.com/microsoft-office-2010-key-c-43.html">office 2010</a> various easiest process that you never seen before into the any other version of Microsoft Power - Point.But time after time, your condition just doesn't improve.When taxes do go up, your traditional IRA will take a tax hit, and it could be significant.
<a href="http://www.myoffice2010.com/win-7-anytime-upgrade-c-40.html" title="windows 7 upgrade key">windows 7 upgrade key</a>

Reply to this Top