Image: 2012-10-10 21:59:56
Share
How many times have you heard this line: “It is your duty as a citizen of America to get out and vote.”
No doubt it has been a lecture you’ve heard from every crotchety old man, or button-wearing campaign promoter that has hassled you these past weeks when you were simply trying to go from point A to point B.
Regardless, in 2008 that phrase evolved — or devolved as it were — into the famous MTV sponsored campaign invented by P. Diddy called “Vote or Die."
Think about that. In one fell swoop, something that was a right and responsibility has been essentially turned into a threat by a Mr. Diddy, who is almost certainly less qualified to weigh in on politics than a run-over chipmunk that has been festering on the side of the road.
So, this year, I have decided to start my own campaign called “Stay in and Sleep.”
I know, I know, my new slogan sounds like a conservative’s sleazy attempt to convince younger citizens — who normally lean to the left — to not vote so the GOP candidate can win.
However, my intentions are actually set in a firm hope that our country might actually elect someone who is right for our population.
Now, I’m not here to say the American people have botched every past election, I’m just saying that even when we have gotten it right, it was probably done on accident.
You see, the result of the distinguished Diddy’s campaign is a bunch of 18-year-olds voting based on “Who looks like he’d represent our country,” or the even better, “He is the candidate of the party my parents raised me to believe is right.”
That kind of groupthink is what leads to a charismatic, but unqualified, candidate to be put in office.
And while that was a blatant stab at President Barrack Obama that wasn’t subtle in the slightest bit, many voters on the right don’t exactly do their due diligence when selecting a candidate either.
For instance, if a person uses the statement, “He looks like someone I’d like to drink a beer with,” as the reason he/she voted for a candidate, the ballot shouldn’t count.
I’d love to have a beer with Charles Barkley, but I’d sooner vote for that grilled cheese sandwich that slightly resembles the Virgin Mary.
For those reasons, my campaign will begin in full swing here in the remaining weeks. My workers will dress in pajamas and set up sofas on streets of cities all over the country and get people to pledge to sleep in come Election Day.
Why? Because if I can convince people to not vote by simply telling them it’d be easier to sleep in, there is absolutely zero chance that they were going to research the candidates’ views on major issues to form an educated opinion on which would look out for their personal interests.
A little cynical, maybe, but as someone that had just turned 18 when the 2008 election occurred, I had a lot of friends who couldn’t have differentiated Obamacare from the children’s game Operation.
My goal is to decrease voter turnout by roughly 83 percent, because according to a study that I have completely made up, only 17 percent of America is truly aware of what the candidates will do if elected.
It is because of this that the Electoral College still exists. Yes, people now have the ability to make an educated decision unlike when the system was created by our founding fathers. But they don’t, and I doubt there will be a day when they all will.
Would I prefer Mitt Romney? Maybe, although that preference is lessened just about every time he speaks these days.
But if my campaign works, and that 17 percent decides Obama, or Virgil Goode or even Barney the Dinosaur and his “I love you; you love me” stance on foreign relations, would be best to run our country, I’d have a hard time saying that we elected the wrong person.
Well, until the next election.
A version of this article appeared in the Oct 11 issue of the Collegiate Times.
Leave a comment 25 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
I like this idea. Though I won't stay in and sleep, I still won't vote. Politics is boring.
Reply to this Top
This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.
Top
Please never write another article again in your life.
Reply to this Top
You're an editor?? Makes sense. Why don't you save your teenage angst for your diary. This is a lazily written piece of slop, that does nothing but criticize.
Congratulations, I see a fox news career in your future.
Reply to this Top
Nick you are an embarrassment to the university and to the CT. NEVER write another article again
Reply to this Top
Not to even address the rest of the article I feel that your comments about Sean Combs (P Diddy) are completely uncalled for. For starters his net worth is roughly $475 million (as to yours I would guess is under $1k) therefore he has had the opportunity to use his success to influence our nations youth in a positive way. He also graduated from Howard University, and therefore currently has more education than you. Thus I cant seem to understand how a successful, educated, influential, entrepreneur has less credibility than a college student writing terrible articles in a campus newspaper?
Reply to this Top
Was this article serious?
Reply to this Top
Just had to chime in here, to give some balance against the Anonymous jerks who obviously didn't read or understand your article. This is a good satire piece. I think your point is clear: "Don't vote if you don't know the issues." Indirectly, "Knowing the issues is just as important as getting out to vote!" Keep writing, you're doing a good job.
Reply to this Top
I got that it was supposed to be satire.....writing something one calls satire is not an excuse to abandon facts and generally make yourself sound like an ass.
Reply to this Top
It's not satire if you tell the audience you're writing satire.
Reply to this Top
There is no reason to insult the person who wrote this simply because you don't agree with him. He is not an embarrassment to the University, and I say that as an alum of VT for both undergrad and grad school. He is entitled to his opinion, as you are to yours. You still have the right to go out and vote for Obama if you choose. It was a funny article, and makes a good point about how little many young voters know about the election.
Reply to this Top
Hey Anon:
I received my B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from VT and I find this article embarrassing to the university.
Reply to this Top
Hey if your political views are that you do not like the political system in this country, not voting is the strongest thing you can do (on election day) to show that. Voting isn't always the answer.
Reply to this Top
Voting is one of the fundamental rights of being a US Citizen. We have soldier's out there giving their life so you can have this right and other rights. For those of you that do not vote, please do not b**** about our political system, keep your mouth shut or leave.
Reply to this Top
This article is more in line with the constitution than your comments. The reason we have the ellectoral college is because you can't possibly know the candidate. Just like P. Diddy is in a different league than all of us. You may know a lot about him, but you'll never personally know him or work with him. Same goes for those running for president. So what we have is a large population of uneducated (I'm not talking about all the fancy degrees you like to throw around) people, some with little to know experience on how the world works other than what your school books tell you, voting for a person they see as "cool", or voting to make history. And you wonder why our country is in the state it's in.
So yes, the author makes a great point. If you don't have a clue about what the people plan to do when they take office, don't bother voting, no matter what age you are. Unless of course you don't care about having a free country to live in when you're older (or for your kids to live in).
Reply to this Top
You shouldn't be calling people uneducated, "little to know experience". I think you meant "no experience".
Reply to this Top
This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.
Top
"My goal is to decrease voter turnout by roughly 83 percent, because according to a study that I have completely made up, only 17 percent of America is truly aware of what the candidates will do if elected."
You realize that this sentence only makes sense if the current turnout rate is 100%, which I can assure you is not the case. It seems that you have a poor understanding of statistics. Maybe you should refrain from voting as well?
Reply to this Top
Voltaire is satire; disguised commentary, accurate assessment of current state of affairs, witty, etc.
To me this article skirted the the edge of satire, my only issue was the distinct republican slant to it. To the writer, either be more discreet with your personal leanings or be more neutral.
Peace.
Reply to this Top
Yes, uninformed people vote, that's a thing.
But this article is idiotic.
I plan to exercise my civic duty and vote.
And besides, you could apply to vote absentee - then you could stay in and sleep on election day with your vote already sent.
Reply to this Top
Yes, uninformed people vote, that's a thing.
But this article is idiotic.
I plan to exercise my civic duty and vote.
And besides, you could apply to vote absentee - then you could stay in and sleep on election day with your vote already sent.
Reply to this Top
Shouldn't this be an opinion piece?
Reply to this Top
This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.
Top
vvhmetiop <a href="http://www.timberlandschuhede.eu/23-womens-timberland-6-inch-boots/" title="Frauen Timberland 6 Inch Boots">Frauen Timberland 6 Inch Boots</a>
Reply to this Top
mfperw <a href="http://cpreec.org/biog/christianlouboutinshoesuk.html" title="christian louboutin shoes uk">christian louboutin shoes uk</a>
Reply to this Top