Share
For female cadets like Stephanie Romero, the future has changed.
On Jan. 23, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women in combat arms roles within the military, opening opportunities in artillery, armor and infantry.
For some female cadets in the Corps, this has significantly changed their outlook and their prospects within the military.
"For myself, I'll actually be going combat arms, so my outlook is that now I have more opportunities within my branch to do stuff," said Cadet First Lt. Stephanie Romero, a senior in international studies and a platoon leader within the Corps.
Romero joined the Corps by chance after selecting the option during her application to Tech and came to enjoy it in during her freshman year. She eventually went into Army ROTC and took the Field Artillery path, a role greatly affected by this new policy change.
"Before, females were only able to do rockets," Romero said. "Now I won't have to worry about not being promoted as quickly as a male just because I haven't had those opportunities within my branch."
Many Cadets now have new opportunities open to them in a military career. However, the issue of women's role in the military has never been an easy one to solve, recently or historically, and few see it as clear-cut.
A New Opportunity
These changes to policy have limited effects on the Corps itself, which has traditionally been very inclusive of females.
"Within the Corps, there's no big change because the Corps has always gone out of its way to make sure females are given leadership opportunities,” Romero said. “Sometimes they try so hard to do so that they'll give females positions that females don't deserve. They really go out of their way to make sure females have those chances.”
While the Corps has already taken action to bring women into the ranks equally, Romero still views the policy change for the entire military as a progressive step in social rights.
"I don't think there are many females who want to go the route of combat arms, but the fact that they can now give hope that there's more equal opportunity and it's really progressive for women," Romero said.
The view is also shared by Cadet Captain Catherine Lijewski, a senior in communication, and the Commander for the ROTC Battalion at Virginia Tech. She is specializing in Military Intelligence with the Army.
Lijewski joined the Corps at Tech because it presented the best combination of going into service while still maintaining a normal college experience.
“I came down here, checked out the Corps, loved what I saw from it, and decided to sign up and join," Lijewski remembered.
Lijewski, who is less affected by the change because Military Intelligence has yet to allow women the opportunity to apply for officer positions, also pointed out that while the changes are new, they will not be quite as drastic as when women were initially allowed to enroll at all.
“Most everything else in the military is integrated already, so it's not like it's going to be something new; it's not like they've never seen a woman before," she said.
A version of this article appeared in the Feb 5 issue of the Collegiate Times.
Leave a comment 9 Comments Write a letter to the editor
All letters to the editor must include a name, e-mail, daytime phone number and affiliation to Virginia Tech. Affiliation includes: year and major for students; position and department for faculty and staff; current city for alumni and parents.
It’s great for equality but people always seem not to look down the line. There is Selective Service that males between 18 and 25 years of age must register for. The draft isn’t around now and of course those part of military conscription aren't trained or combat ready.
So no combat exemption for women that since the 1990's by the Supreme Court that is no longer in place for your daughters 17-18 years of age?
A woman “choice” of what she does with her body or rather her reproductive system has never been anyone's business but especially a man.
Selective service is mandatory for males or they wouldn't get financial aid such as the Pell Grant.
Yes there are biological & physiological/emotional differences between male and female. Not stating the obvious.
Women are afforded certain opportunities such as maternal leave from work. A mother is more likely to win custody of the kids. Equality is double edge sword.
You can be all for equality and everything but when the young teenage girls is told that hey you have to sign up for Selective Service when you turn 18 then where will be the outcry from feminists and liberals about "choice" ?
Internal steps in the U.S. military for women i.e pregnancy prevention, separate living quarters etc. things still will be fundamentally different.
I'm not a sexist, I'm not a misogynist, I am a realist.
usnews . nbcnews .com/_news/2013/01/29/16745990-push-for-all-younger-women-to-register-with-selective-service-gaining-steam
www . time . com/time/covers/0,16641,19920120,00.html
nation .time . com/2013/01/25/women-in-combat-vive-a-difference/
Reply to this Top
So the powers that be in Washington D.C. has once again made changes to the miltary. Oh I'm sure POTUS wouldn't heisiate to send his children to combat or rather has no problem sending yours.
A certain commander-in-chief is in the process of cutting defense spnding and whinding down two wars. This individual of the executve branch may say on the surface this is about equality like DADT. It's simply a ploy for the farther reduction of the U.S. military.
Reply to this Top
Do not use the example of the Israeli military.
Reply to this Top
This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.
Top
acquire ralph lauren,Adhering to a number of most recently released visits listed here, even so, is now more and more chic. ralph lauren online shop http://www.ralphlaurenshop-de.com/
Reply to this Top
Its such as you read my thoughts! You seem to understand so much approximately this, such as you wrote the e-book in it or something. I think that you can do with a few percent to power the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is magnificent blog. An excellent read. I will certainly be back. Nola http://ukrlife.net/kak-oplachivat-pokupki-v-internet-instruktsiya-po-primeneniyu/
Reply to this Top
Thanks for any other fantastic post. Iveson http://www.replicashandbags.org/alexander-mcqueen-peeptoe-ankle-boots-with-wing/
Reply to this Top
Hey, buddy, I have not figured out how to subscribe Gertine http://www.stuffbiz.net/2012/04/28/ak-sweetener/
Reply to this Top
dzxazdtdgr <a href="http://www.timberlandschuhede.eu/26-womens-timberland-sandalen-stiefel/" title="Frauen Timberland Sandalen Stiefel">Frauen Timberland Sandalen Stiefel</a>
Reply to this Top