America needs new perspective on foreign policy

Tuesday, February, 19, 2013; 10:02 PM | 14 | | Print

Share


Many Americans want to believe the United States is the absolute center of the world. Our country and what it does seems to matter the most, and the actions that take place in this country will, in turn, affect every nation in the entire world.

The United States’ foreign policy has been run, since World War II, on the sometimes-misidentified notion that we are superior to everyone else. I am in no way arguing the United States of America is not an amazing country, because that would be a completely absurd insinuation.

However, in regard to foreign relations, the United States usually misses the mark in one way or another. Our country feels as though it is above the need to think about the consequences of its actions. We have the tendency to use our position as a “world power” to push some sort of action that usually ends up causing a worldwide headache.

In an article released by The Guardian regarding the Israeli attack on Gaza, columnist Glenn Greenwald said, “Israeli aggression is possible only because of direct, affirmative, unstinting U.S. diplomatic, financial and military support for Israel and everything it does.”

To further prove that the United States’ current mindset on foreign policy is not where it should be, Huffington Post writer Conrad Black enumerated a number of issues the United States has sparked internationally without thinking about their implications. Ironically, the article is titled “Like Bad Wine, U.S. Foreign Policy Gets Worse with Time.”

The column said, “The United States ditched its Egyptian ally, Mubarak, — as President Carter had ditched the much more progressive Shah of Iran — ditched the reasonably reliable Saleh of Yemen, — now a failed state —but effectively endorsed brutally rigged elections in Iran, as well as the mockery of Putin's reelection in Russia, while Hillary Clinton described Syrian President Assad as 'a reformer,' and Obama declared that Qaddafi 'must go' but declined to do anything about it until France and Britain took the lead (and revealed their threadbare military capacities).”

In all of these international situations, the United States has played a major role in pushing some sort of agenda. Most of the scenarios cost human lives, including Americans.

It is time to recognize that we have our own problems to deal with. The United States is far from a perfect country, yet we want other countries to look up to us as a sort of “big brother.”

If we want to be the role model for other nations in the world, we need to fix our own problems first. We need to rein in the national debt and tackle the unemployment problems plaguing our economy. Once this happens, we can focus on assisting in international situations that do not directly involve our country.   

All these events directly lead back to the superiority complex the United States has adopted over the years.

Foreign policy is an important function of our nation’s government, but noting the many scenarios we have inserted ourselves into over the past decade, foreign relations has become our biggest weakness.

The world will never be perfect, and we need to remember that we cannot fix every problem that arises. No matter how hard the United States tries to control the multitude of international mayhem, there will always be conflict. There is only one thing the United States has complete control over: how we respond to it.

A version of this article appeared in the Feb 20 issue of the Collegiate Times.

Leave a comment 14 Comments Write a letter to the editor

Savage | # February 19, 2013 @ 10:59 PM — Flag Comment

Thanks for the terrible column Mr. Anti We Are The World...

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 20, 2013 @ 3:02 AM — Flag Comment

Very funny Ryan,

While there still are military units deployed in Europe (yes the Cold War is over) and Asia.

While many will blame the current conflict on the basis of the U.S. footprint in the Middle East (ala Saudi Arabia ---> U.S.S Cole) and fighting two wars Iraq and Afghanistan let's take a step back.

U.S. foreign policy has changed since the days of founding fathers ( Monroe doctrine)
The U.S. once was non-interventionist (Napoleon and the 1920's)

The conflicts we have been the most involved in other than the obvious World War I and World War II (we had to bail Europe out of ) Also, there was the (Bosnian) conflict (NATO).

The Cold War was an indirect conflict Vietnam and Korean Wars
Cuba Nicaragua Grenada and Iran contra.
Not to forget our involvement with the resistance to Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan.

Quite simply the Presidents (Ted Roosevelt to Eisenhower to Ronald Reagan) 20 century (1900's) to present have set U.S. foreign policy.

American shores have not been "invaded" by a nation state since 1812.

The U.S. has not official declared war since World War II
(Korea Vietnam Desert Storm Afghanistan Iraq)

The U.S. fails to step in Africa (Rwanda) or a disaster like Black Hawk down (Somalia) we re-evaluate policy.

The U.S. had little to no expansion during the Age of Imperialism (unlike Europe).
Remember when the world is in chaos and dictator run rampant where will be America?

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 20, 2013 @ 12:54 PM — Flag Comment

I don't fully agree with Ryan; however, I see the point he's making. We used an unbelievable amount of money on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (seeing how Clinton paid off the National Debt near the end of his term) that we could have used to fix some of the many issues in our country.

Whether war is undeclared or declared, war is war. Vietnam and Korea were huge ones. We all know that America wants to keep its position as a world power.

However, if you look back, the 1920s until the Great Depression were some of the best (Roaring 20s).

Regarding your point on the fact that our country has not been attacked since the War of 1812, the obvious reason is because we would obviously have the advantage. Mexico and Canada know that they are weaker than us militarily, and fighting on our terf would not benefit anyone who would have to cross the sea.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 20, 2013 @ 3:51 PM — Flag Comment

Wat.

No.

There was no "Deficit" in the budget. Not to be confused with Debt. There was a budget surplus, and no debt service was performed with the surplus.

Top


Regarding War | # February 20, 2013 @ 5:52 PM — Flag Comment

Formal declarations of war obviously don't mean a thing anymore. Listing the Korean War, Vietnam War, War in Afghanistan, War in Iraq, Persian Gulf War, Bosnian Conflict, and so on, there was no formal declaration by Congress; Congress just eventually agreed to fund it with their hands tied, in some cases. Afghanistan is still currently going on. Honestly, I agree with Ryan regarding inserting ourselves into conflicts we have little to no business being involved in. Such an example was Libya.

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 20, 2013 @ 3:04 AM — Flag Comment

Disclaimer

Author is a freshman and writes for Collegiate Times

Nothing to see here folks

Reply to this Top


Foreign Policy | # February 20, 2013 @ 12:58 PM — Flag Comment

Well, Ryan, the US cant help that the rest of the world cant help themselves...

Reply to this Top


Anonymous | # February 20, 2013 @ 2:32 PM — Flag Comment

So you like the Guardian's opinion eh? THEN WHY DON'T YOU MOVE TO BRITAIN!

Reply to this Top


Supertroll | # February 20, 2013 @ 4:46 PM — Flag Comment

If this guy had his way, we wouldn't have helped Haiti or Japan after their earthquake relief effort. Good to see you care about the world, Ryan Turk.

Reply to this Top


http://bigorbust.net/no-deposit-casinos | # February 21, 2013 @ 11:51 AM — Flag Comment

This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.

Top


where to get cheap jordans online | # February 22, 2013 @ 1:29 PM — Flag Comment

This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.

Top


cheap jordans online with free shipping | # February 22, 2013 @ 6:41 PM — Flag Comment

This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.

Top


7dayenjoy | # March 26, 2013 @ 11:11 PM — Flag Comment

This comment was deleted for violating our comment policy.

Top


Frauen Timberland 6 Inch Boots | # April 13, 2013 @ 3:14 AM — Flag Comment

ohzmcnphbqd <a href="http://www.timberlandschuhede.eu/23-womens-timberland-6-inch-boots/" title="Frauen Timberland 6 Inch Boots">Frauen Timberland 6 Inch Boots</a>

Reply to this Top