Column: Upcoming elections in Va. demand attention

Thursday, November, 1, 2007; 12:00 AM | 8 | | Print

Share


While it hasn't been getting much attention on campus, there is a statewide election coming up next Tuesday, Nov. 6. Up for grabs are all 100 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates and all 40 seats in the Virginia Senate. Additionally, all local constitutional officers (e.g. sheriff) are on the ballot.

I will grant that state legislative races don't seem as exciting as the race for governor, congress, or president. However, they are actually more important than many higher-profile races.

Sure it's true that the president and congress have a bearing on laws, but it is our state legislators who set many of our taxes, determine how money will be spent, and enact or repeal laws that directly affect our lives.

Of particular importance this year is the Virginia Senate, control of which is being sought by two different factions. One of these is the Democratic Party, who needs to win only four seats to capture a majority in the Senate. This could have several long-term ramifications, not the least of which is some control of the redistricting process that will take place after the 2010 census.

Also trying to win the Senate is a faction of fiscal conservatives who have long seen the Republican leadership in the Senate as too willing to raise taxes rather than limit spending. This was manifest in 2004 with the passage of former Governor Mark Warner's massive tax increase. The bill could not have gone through without the cooperation of the higher-up Republicans in the Senate.

For myself, I support the fiscally conservative group. I don't care so much about party affiliation as I do about having senators who will respect the individual's right to keep as much as he or she earns (many will disagree with me on this, of course, but the point of this column is not to argue economic philosophy so much as highlight the dynamics of the election.)

That said, there are two Senate races in the western half of Virginia that are of great interest to both democrats and fiscal conservatives. The first is District 24, which is north of Blacksburg and includes Lexington, Staunton, Waynesboro and several of the surrounding counties.

This race is unique for several reasons. For one, it is a three-way race where the incumbent republican, Emmett Hanger, is facing opposition from libertarian Arin Sime and democrat David Cox. While the 24th district is strongly Republican, Senator Hanger has come under fire for not standing up for lower taxes and property rights.

It is noteworthy that Sen. Hanger only narrowly survived an intra-party opposition during the June primary.

Capitalizing on Sen. Hanger's neglect of fiscally conservative principles,

Sime has run on a solid platform of keeping taxes and spending in check, protecting private property from eminent domain abuse and school choice. A Sime victory in the 24th District would be not only a boon to fiscal conservatives, but also to the Libertarian Party, who could claim their first seat in the Virginia Senate.

And it's not outside the realm of possibility. As of Sept. 30 Sime had raised over $35,000 for his campaign, which is quite respectable for a third party, especially considering that Cox, the Democratic candidate, has raised only $11,000.

Hopefully the voters of District 24 will have the courage to elect a true fiscal conservative rather than a Republican in name only.

The second Senate race of great interest to both of the aforementioned factions is much closer to home.

Continue Reading: 12 Next » 

Leave a comment 8 Comments Write a letter to the editor

LK | # November 1, 2007 @ 10:45 AM — Flag Comment

Interesting note here.. Bush and co. may have screwed things up badly in the eyes of the public, but in many recent polls, Americans have a lower approval of the Democratic-controlled Congress than of the Bush administration.

Reply to this Top


Gabe McVey | # November 1, 2007 @ 1:29 PM — Flag Comment

Actually, when you split the parties in opinion polling, the GOP sits around 16% and the DEMS are at about 32%.

Reply to this Top


Gabe McVey | # November 1, 2007 @ 1:29 PM — Flag Comment

Cold comfort either way...the American public has not faith in its own system.

Reply to this Top


LK | # November 1, 2007 @ 2:55 PM — Flag Comment

(a) approval of a political party alone is not what we're talking about, and (b) wrong on general point. compare the first paragraph with the second. Every poll has been like this for a while. http://www.gallup.com/poll/22786/Update-Bush-Congress-Approval.aspx

Reply to this Top


Jonathan McGlumphy | # November 1, 2007 @ 3:10 PM — Flag Comment

Gabe, I have to disagree with you. The only polls that really matter are the ones every November. And going by those the American public has an overwhelming faith in the current system: Over 95% of Congress gets re-elected. Wouldn't it be great if only 16% or 32% went back each time? Or better yet if we started voting for alternatives to the same ole R & D.

Reply to this Top


LK | # November 1, 2007 @ 3:29 PM — Flag Comment

It seems like we just got too balanced and are stuck in a two-party system. If people just voted for the candidate they liked the best (independents and third parties included), without considering whether their favorite "has a chance," maybe those guys would actually end up having a chance. It would also cause more third-parties and independents to want to run.

Reply to this Top


Skip n DC | # November 2, 2007 @ 3:35 AM — Flag Comment

Don't think for second that because there's a low approval rating for the Democratically controlled Congress that it's a signal that they want to return to a Republican led one. This approval rating reflects the fact the the Dems don't have enough votes to override all the parlimentary trick that the (R) have be using to prevent things from moving forward. They (D)s also don't have enough vote to override all of the vetoes the Pres. Bush is issuing to prevent anything from moving forward. The People don't like Bush for what he has done, is doing and what he might do. The People don't like the 'Democratically controlled' Congress because they can't get done what the People want to be done, that is to stop or slowdown the Bush/Republican agenda.

Reply to this Top


LK | # November 2, 2007 @ 10:15 AM — Flag Comment

Which means they both stink. But Congress stinks worse.

Reply to this Top